GDT: Montreal Canadiens @ Boston Bruins | 730PM March 3, 2013 | RDS, NBCSN, TSN-HABS

Status
Not open for further replies.

Coldplay

Courage
Aug 21, 2008
13,744
1
Montréal
I'm really surprised at the decision to start Budaj, but on the other hand - it's not like Price has given us any reason to believe he should be in for back to backs recently. Budaj played well his last time out.

Still, surprised.
 

Muminek

Registered User
Jan 20, 2012
1,511
0
Perhaps Therrien has decided he will bench Price after he has a bad game? He must have no confidence in him right now. I hope the Habs will play a disciplined game in front of Budaj, we won`t win without a D against the Bruins.
 

Coldplay

Courage
Aug 21, 2008
13,744
1
Montréal
Way to destroy the confidence of your #1 goalie. :shakehead

Seriously? If this "destroys" his confidence then he's not a #1 goalie.

Instead of coming in here and making bold proclamations, maybe save them for your board.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Sports1131

Registered User
Oct 24, 2004
2,174
5
First decision from Therrien this year that I really disagree with. How do you not start your #1 guy against your biggest rival in a battle for first place?

I really hope I'm wrong, and this team has pleasantly surprised me on more than one occasion so far, but my expectations for tonight's game are incredibly low.
 

overlords

#DefundCBC
Aug 16, 2008
33,139
13,061
The City
In before price goes back to playing like price and people credit therrien with 'rebuilding him as a player' or 'making him a better person'.
 

Alicat

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 26, 2005
89,662
102,249
Norman, OK
It's a back to back game.. You guys didn't play Rask yesterday did you?
No but it is completely different than this situation.

Rask got shelled for 7 goals in Buffalo and 2 nights later he started in Toronto and got a shut out in a 1-0 game.

Price should start tonight even though he let in 7 last night. He doesn't have to win but a close game would keep his confidence level high. By not starting him after last night sends the wrong message to him imo.
 

Coldplay

Courage
Aug 21, 2008
13,744
1
Montréal
No but it is completely different than this situation.

Rask got shelled for 7 goals in Buffalo and 2 nights later he started in Toronto and got a shut out in a 1-0 game.

Price should start tonight even though he let in 7 last night. He doesn't have to win but a close game would keep his confidence level high. By not starting him after last night sends the wrong message to him imo.

This is not 2 nights later.

Your entire argument is moot.
 

Mynameismark*

Guest
No but it is completely different than this situation.

Rask got shelled for 7 goals in Buffalo and 2 nights later he started in Toronto and got a shut out in a 1-0 game.

Price should start tonight even though he let in 7 last night. He doesn't have to win but a close game would keep his confidence level high. By not starting him after last night sends the wrong message to him imo.

Price is fine. He's cool, calm and collected. The chosen goalie for Sochi...nothing can deter him.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Big Ryan

Registered User
Mar 27, 2011
148
83
Ottawa
No but it is completely different than this situation.

Rask got shelled for 7 goals in Buffalo and 2 nights later he started in Toronto and got a shut out in a 1-0 game.

Price should start tonight even though he let in 7 last night. He doesn't have to win but a close game would keep his confidence level high. By not starting him after last night sends the wrong message to him imo.

But it wasn't a back to back. If it wasn't a back to back, Price would be getting the start.
 

Leo Getz

Registered User
Sep 4, 2007
1,712
0
No but it is completely different than this situation.

Rask got shelled for 7 goals in Buffalo and 2 nights later he started in Toronto and got a shut out in a 1-0 game.

Price should start tonight even though he let in 7 last night. He doesn't have to win but a close game would keep his confidence level high. By not starting him after last night sends the wrong message to him imo.

I understand that the Bruins are relatively new to this whole "back-to-back" thing. If this game was played tomorrow, Price is more than likely our goalie. It doesn't really have to do with his play yesterday, moreso the fact that we are playing two games in two nights.
 

BeardBros

Everything hurt more
Jun 10, 2009
724
0
314
Fatigue might be the only problem after last night. We can contain Boston much better than we did against Pittsburgh's last night. Pens created gaping holes in the ice to shoot from; Bruins have better depth but don't have that level of individual talent.

Really is shame we're missing Bourque.

Price will be ready and pumped.

I'm sure you've seen from reading our board that most everyone will let you have ours.
 

Leon Lucius Black

Registered User
Nov 5, 2007
16,025
6,212
Budaj has shutout Boston in half the games he has started against them! (2 starts and his shutout was about 6 years ago) :laugh:
 

Habtchum*

Guest
Budaj played very well in his last two outings.

His presence might boost his teamates' defensive awareness, too.
 

Era of Sanity

Certified Poster
Nov 12, 2010
4,321
9
I am not surprised your Habs are better this season, though I didn't think they would be doing this well. Last year was an abberation, I am not sure how they finished so bad but everything went wrong I guess and Markov has been a big difference maker it seems.

Should be a good game, hopefully the good guys come out on top . .
 

Alicat

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 26, 2005
89,662
102,249
Norman, OK
No, it isn't, because the circumstances aren't.

Had Rask gotten shelled and you guys played Toronto on the back-to-back night, good chance Khudobin would have played.
Agree to disagree but at least it allows for meaningful conversation. Will be interesting to see him play as I am not that familiar with him.

What are his strengths/weaknesses?
 

TopTittie

Registered User
Jul 26, 2006
6,651
0
The point is still the same.

It's not. Your argument is that Price's confidence will be destroyed because he's not playing after a bad game. My argument is that MT is not sitting him down to send a message, but to give him some much needed rest. It has nothing to do with his performance last game. 90+% of the time the backup and starter will split back to back games, except if the 1st goalie has a shutout or something. If the game was tomorrow then you could compare it to the Rask situation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Ad

Ad