OT: MLB Thread 2024

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Yeah this is the dumbest idea ever.

This isn’t America’s Got Talent. The extra innings runner on 2nd rule is dumb enough, don’t need this shit too.

"I got the idea from Michael Scott's Golden Ticket scheme on The Office."

"Uh, Michael Scott got that idea from Willy Wonka."

"I look up to Michael Scott as an executive."
 

YES! Soon enough my childhood dream will come true...
Baseballsim1000SNES_boxart.jpg
 
"Golden At-bat"

I'm still dumbfounded he marketed it as such. A stupid idea with a stupider name.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ben Grimm
I fondly remember the days when a good number of pitchers could actually hit.
Define your definition of a good number because woof, overall they were always bad except, of course, for a few outliers.
Screenshot_4-12-2024_225452_www.reddit.com.jpeg



For me, I'd rather pitchers spend their time concentrating on what they do best and what got them to MLB rather than a skill, where if they stopped pitching young, they wouldn't have even been looked at in their draft as a viable position player to make it to MLB.
 
... For me, I'd rather pitchers spend their time concentrating on what they do best and what got them to MLB rather than a skill, where if they stopped pitching young, they wouldn't have even been looked at in their draft as a viable position player to make it to MLB.
The lack of knowledge is shocking. Many MLB pitchers were some of the best athletes and hitters on their pre-MLB teams.
 
The DH and pitcher's hitting are totally unrelated. There is much more to baseball (and sports) appreciation and knowledge than stats and it's not reflected in this thread. I agree to disagree. Have a great day!
 
  • Like
Reactions: sbjnyc
Define your definition of a good number because woof, overall they were always bad except, of course, for a few outliers.
View attachment 940188


For me, I'd rather pitchers spend their time concentrating on what they do best and what got them to MLB rather than a skill, where if they stopped pitching young, they wouldn't have even been looked at in their draft as a viable position player to make it to MLB.

It’s very funny to see that pitcher’s hitting peaked sometime during the Teddy Roosevelt administration lol
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Machinehead
In 1988 and 89, Ron Darling as a pitcher came close to matching Rey Ordonez's nominal season batting output.
 
the only good thing to ever come out of pitchers hitting was Colon's home run. That's it. Next question.
"Some pitchers hit good back in the day!"

Mike Hampton had a 67 OPS+ and struck out five times more than he walked. That's a pitcher hitting good.
 
Degrom and Gooden also were good hitters
DeGrom had a 35 OPS+ and Gooden had a 32 OPS+.

You would never stick in the majors hitting like that as a position player, unless maybe you were a bomb ass defensive catcher, but then, even Jeff Mathis had a 48 OPS+.

The guys everyone brings up as good-hitting pitchers simply don't hit at an MLB level, so it kind of proves the point.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad