Player Discussion Mitch Marner

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Oddly placed sarcasm. I didn't say Matthews shows up. Winning the Cup might be a stretch because even the best team can fizzle out in the playoffs for several reasons. But if you don't think we'd have had more playoff success with that swap then just say so, or don't. Strange to try to trivialize an opinion that wasn't even argumentative with hyperbole.
If this place is funny it's because you can't put out an opinion without someone thinking the best way to disagree is by trying to make the other person look silly instead of just discussing.
No we wouldn't win a cup with just that swap. Your thesis assumes Matthews does show up, my response is one player swapped doesn't make a difference when most of your core still wilts in key moments. TB didn't wilt, they had many people come forward, goalies, defenders, forwards. Kuch isn't the only variable. To me your opinion is simplistic, is that better than silly?
 
Many have said Marner > Kutch, Marner best RWer in the league in the past.

As for the -2, it was one year. Look at the rest of his career. 4x100 points seasons. Not pacing for 100 point seasons. Let's not bring up hardware.

View attachment 845862
Sounds like a real strawman you built there. You must think Bergeron sucked as a forward
 
Whenever certain posters blow smoke up asse# and people notice and call them on it, they just act like they never said it and move on.

I asked @Zybalto numerous questions regarding the stats he cited and he ran and hid.
Any stat that contains "x" or "ex" or "expected" is automatically bogus and any argument based on those "stats" is to be discarded.
 
Any stat that contains "x" or "ex" or "expected" is automatically bogus and any argument based on those "stats" is to be discarded.
Rule for the Marner fans is that any and all stats that shine a negative light on Marner is bogus and should be discarded. However, if one week any of those stats are favorable for Marner then they will post them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 57 Years No Cup
Any stat that contains "x" or "ex" or "expected" is automatically bogus and any argument based on those "stats" is to be discarded.
Any counting that goes beyond fingers should be discarded for some who have their socks on.
Those with their socks off who cite numbers like 21 or 22 are just spouting imaginary bullshit.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ACC1224
Hopefully they practice today and we get an update on his progress and if he'll play Saturday.
 
No we wouldn't win a cup with just that swap. Your thesis assumes Matthews does show up, my response is one player swapped doesn't make a difference when most of your core still wilts in key moments. TB didn't wilt, they had many people come forward, goalies, defenders, forwards. Kuch isn't the only variable. To me your opinion is simplistic, is that better than silly?
Much better since I was meaning to make a simplistic view. I'm not really comparing Toronto and Tampa. Obviously there are more impactful players on Tampa, their organization has been better in many aspects for the whole core four Era.
I think kucherov has an intensity and he's so quick to put the puck into dangerous areas accurately off the half wall. Seems like he has great chemistry with his linemates (knows where they are) but I think he's just playing that fast.
This is probably systemic and a coach should fix this (ours hasn't) but our players, Marner and Nylander especially love holding the puck and staring down their passes just a little bit longer giving goalies more chance to set (I think).
 
Much better since I was meaning to make a simplistic view. I'm not really comparing Toronto and Tampa. Obviously there are more impactful players on Tampa, their organization has been better in many aspects for the whole core four Era.
I think kucherov has an intensity and he's so quick to put the puck into dangerous areas accurately off the half wall. Seems like he has great chemistry with his linemates (knows where they are) but I think he's just playing that fast.
This is probably systemic and a coach should fix this (ours hasn't) but our players, Marner and Nylander especially love holding the puck and staring down their passes just a little bit longer giving goalies more chance to set (I think).
That goal by Point last night was a great play by Kucherov, we've also seen Marner make the same play many times.
They are all elite players, their strengths and weaknesses differ.
 
Kooch has a love hate relationship with the die hards down south. Some nights he’s lights out, and some nights his lights are out.

That’s what I’ve been told.
 
That goal by Point last night was a great play by Kucherov, we've also seen Marner make the same play many times.
They are all elite players, their strengths and weaknesses differ.
True but I think Kucherov is better at it and I think it's better for playoff hockey because it keeps the pressure from getting to you when there is less space. I think Kucherov does it more, and better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ACC1224
Rule for the Marner fans is that any and all stats that shine a negative light on Marner is bogus and should be discarded. However, if one week any of those stats are favorable for Marner then they will post them.
No. Properly presented stats have value in these discussions. But, you can't measure hockey with stats like baseball and this is where the fake stats are much more of a problem.

All it takes to understand Marner is to watch him and or watch the team without him. Anyone who watches Marner and doesn't realize very quickly that he is a superstar simply does not understand the game. Period. All players deserve some criticism some times. But if you are one the haters who believes that Marner shouldn't be re-signed then you clearly do not understand the game and it will be proven to you when the professionals who are responsible for re-signing him do, REGARDLESS how how he performs in the coming playoffs.

So for the haters who are waiting to see him "get better in the playoffs" before you give your approval, it's too late. If you had your way he wouldn't be on the team anymore so you have chosen a very strange hill to die on. Man, it must suck cheering against the second best Leaf in the modern era.
 
Last edited:
Much better since I was meaning to make a simplistic view. I'm not really comparing Toronto and Tampa. Obviously there are more impactful players on Tampa, their organization has been better in many aspects for the whole core four Era.
I think kucherov has an intensity and he's so quick to put the puck into dangerous areas accurately off the half wall. Seems like he has great chemistry with his linemates (knows where they are) but I think he's just playing that fast.
This is probably systemic and a coach should fix this (ours hasn't) but our players, Marner and Nylander especially love holding the puck and staring down their passes just a little bit longer giving goalies more chance to set (I think).
Kuch is an incredible player.
 
Man, it must suck cheering against the second best Leaf in the modern era.
And they literally do, when he does something positive I just know it hurts a little bit. What pathetic corner have you painted yourself into that you feel this way? It really isn't about a player at that point, it's more about personal defects. That's why I begrudgingly just put a select few on ignore now, and my experience here is slightly better. I don't hang with bottom feeders in real life, not sure why social media demands otherwise. It isn't intellectual debate either, that's just cover for misfits.

Looking forward to his return and how Keefe finds a good mix. For now I think he and Matthews would be better separated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ACC1224 and 666
And they literally do, when he does something positive I just know it hurts a little bit. What pathetic corner have you painted yourself into that you feel this way? It really isn't about a player at that point, it's more about personal defects. That's why I begrudgingly just put a select few on ignore now, and my experience here is slightly better. I don't hang with bottom feeders in real life, not sure why social media demands otherwise. It isn't intellectual debate either, that's just cover for misfits.
It must truly be horrible for them. The cognitive dissonance that they must feel when Marner is doing his magic must eat them up. We definitely see it reflected on here as they seem pretty miserable. Unfortunately, we've almost certainly got at least 10 more years of this ahead of us.
 
Never said anybody sucked. Kutch also better than Bergeron. Does not mean Bergeron sucked.
Yet you are pumping a viewpoint of vast differences based on a set of metrics that are far more exacerbated with Bergeron. You just can't clock up the range. I would argue that Bergeron has had a career that Marner has yet to achieve but an argument based on what you pulled would make it hands down Marner.
 
Agreed.
If I were to rank them I'd have it,
Vasy or Campbell/Samsonov
Keefe or Cooper
Hedman or Rielly
Kucherov or Marner
Kucherov v. Marner is the least impactful of those swaps. Smallest gap in player smallest positional importance for a playoff run unless they are really on fire. I think any single swap of the four and we have multiple years with better playoff success than we have had.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gary Nylund
Kucherov v. Marner is the least impactful of those swaps. Smallest gap in player smallest positional importance for a playoff run unless they are really on fire. I think any single swap of the four and we have multiple years with better playoff success than we have had.
Leafs do not win a cup with Kutch instead of Marner. More interesting question is, does Tampa win with Marner instead of Kutch?
 
Given how Woll has looked after his high ankle sprain, and how bad Rielly and others have looked when coming back from the same injury, my expectations of Mitch are going to be fairly low tbh. It's just a tough injury to come back from and it takes months to be 100% again, often times it's worse than a bone break. I think it would actually be best for him to play on a lower line away from Matthews against weaker competition to ease back in.
 
Tkachuk had a great playoffs last year, but otherwise one is > PPG and is < PPG career.
Situationally, players have different impacts depending on team mates. I would bet most teams would think they would win a cup with McDavid but they would be wrong.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad