Serious flaw is an overstatement, at least IMO. Nylander's "flaw" is that he's not strong defensively, though he is better this season. Marner's just a well rounded player with no real flaws, my only complaint about him is that he seems to fade away after 86 games. Not sure what to call that, is it a flaw? Is it just one of those things? Shambles of the brain? Will it keep happening or will it never happen again? I don't know what to make of it because I've never seen anything like it but for those first 86 games every season, he's money in the bank. And hey, maybe he kills it this spring, and every spring going forward, one can hope right?
I'm in neither "camp" and I think they're close to equal value. As of today I would take Nylander because he doesn't fade away after 86 games, he just keeps on trucking and seems like he doesn't know the meaning of the word pressure. But it's not out of the question that Marner outplays him this spring in which case I'll say yup, I should have taken Marner.
It seems like it's hard to have a serious discussion about Marner any more because he has a few fans that are so sensitive and so rabid that all you have to do is interrupt their circle jerk by mentioning the word playoffs, and you get labelled a hater. And one of those people who labelled me a hater a long time ago even called me "insane" for saying I'd take Nylander over Marner in a close decision as of right now. It's unfortunate but I guess that's the way internet forums work, a small number of loudmouths make things difficult for everyone else.
This is a ridiculous lie and is exactly the kind of bullshit that has taken the place of intelligent conversation. You keep repeating this kind of nonsense, funny how you can never show examples of anyone doing this sort if thing, you just yell at these clouds that exist only in your imagination.