Zybalto
Registered User
- Dec 28, 2012
- 9,848
- 9,330
xG value is the statistical chance of the unblocked shot to become a goal. xG is literally the most direct way to measure shot quality that exists, given the current Play-By-Play data. This PBP data is made by NHL available to the public, but it has its inaccuracies, inconsistencies and omissions.
2024 even strength:
Marner xG% with Matthews: 53.97
Marner xG℅ without Matthews: 42.5%
Matthew's xG% without Marner: 53.85
Good thing Matthews has Marner to increase his xG% by 0.12%!
Marner without Matthews looking pretty rough by comparison.
Putting aside the fact Marner plays less offensive zone minutes away from Matthews, you are absolutely correct that Marner is less effective away from Matthews.....but Matthews is also far less dangerous without Marner on his wing, especially in the playoffs. (Ill expand in a sec).
Theres still a lot of hockey to play though and a lot of Marner's data with Matthews was before some failed experiments without Knies on the wing.
Matthews/Marner Knies: (Ill use xG% label as you seem to like it and I will include the actual goal differential as well as the end results matter too.)
xG%: 57.33
Goal differential: 69.67%
If you really want to see the value of Marner though, I'll leave you (and others) with this:
We all want to see Matthews tearing it up in the playoffs as this guy seems like a once in a lifetime player to have on the team. Here are his splits over the last 3 years in the playoffs:
Matthews with Marner 5v5:
TOI: 330:36
xG%: 63.87
Goal differential: 64.71
Matthews without Marner 5v5:
TOI: 106:28
xG%: 52.21
Goal differential: 0.00
Thats right.......Auston Matthews has been on the ice for literally 0 goals scored in over 100 5v5 minutes away from Marner the last 3 years while tearing it up when he plays with him.
Let that sink in for a while before you try to cherry pick some other data set.