keonsbitterness
Registered User
Wins in game one or two are meaningful but they have lost their bite after eight years of playoff losses. Few remember when the QB throws a TD pass in the 1st quarter compared to the play he makes to win a playoff game in the 4th quarter. Michael Jordan didn't get called the goat for making 15-footers when the score was 50-48.I understand the logic, I don't think it is as simple as posting that graphic and saying "See, he sucks".
That same graphic says Tavares and Nylander are on the same level.
I want to know the degree of difficulty for each game from games 1-7.
For example, using this logic, Nylander is a major problem during games 1-4 and sucks during the "easy" games, where Marner is over PPG and playing amazingly.
How much of an issue is it that Nylander sucks for over 50% of the games?
The graphic does nothing for me and it seems like a lazy way to try to discredit any of Marner's points just because he helped win games earlier in the series, they still count as a win.
I didn't say Marner sucks. and I'd have no problem getting rid of Nylander or whoever else if it improved the team. But the Leafs are listening to offers for Marner because he is the only guy who can realistically go right now. JT's time will be a year from now. The others we're likely stuck with until the Matthews deal runs out.
Having said that, I still think odds are Marner will be re-signed.