Small, soft, non physical highly skilled player that avoids contact and plays on the perimeter, and prefers to pass rather than shoot.
Great for regular season play and points padding if that's your thing, but that is a bad recipe for success for playoff style hockey, when the games become low scoring, tight checking and far more physically imposing and played at higher pace and intensity with increased pressure for success.
That is what separates Marner from his peers like Aho, Point, Kucherov, Kane, Pastrnak etc who seem to thrive during the regular season, but then take their games to whole new levels come playoff time, because their style of play despite their smaller stature, isn't a hindrance to themselves nor their team.
That's my opinion anyways, and I have the stats to back it up, but most of you already now this without further proof and analytics to convince otherwise.
That position of mine hasn't changed mind you as it goes back to draft day in fact and was a concern even before Leafs made him their top 5 pick. Not a player you desire as part of your core if winning Stanley Cups is the big picture objective. Factor in his his contract and top 5 league high AAV, and he suddenly becomes a liability and no longer an asset, because it not only impacts him through his play but the team around him due to his high cap consumption in comparison to his actual expected contribution at that remuneration.
Only Marner can prove his doubters wrong and start producing goals and assists to put himself among the NHL playoff scoring leaders like good players tend to do, and we're seeing from his comparable peer group that drive their teams success. That makes game #7 a good time to start making that case for himself.
So what do you say Mitch? You want to be part of the solution or part of the problem. Put in a Dougie Gilmour Leafs game tape from 1993 or 1994 and sees how its done, and then do that.