Miscellaneous NHL Discussion XCIX: We're Gonna Party Like It's 99

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.

Who or what represented 99 best?

  • Nena

    Votes: 12 40.0%
  • Wayne Gretzky

    Votes: 7 23.3%
  • Bottles of Beer on the Wall

    Votes: 9 30.0%
  • Something else

    Votes: 2 6.7%

  • Total voters
    30
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
We know if the Flyers tanked, and had the worst record, they'd have ended up with the 3rd pick in the draft and still would have drafted Michkov.

Bedard is going to be very good, but shining in a prospects game (which plays to his strengths b/c lack of defensive structure) really doesn't tell me anything - he's supposed to dominate games like that.
And?
 
Whitney claimed in another recent interview on another podcast that the NHLPA was calling him & Biz telling them they’re lying & they shouldn’t be putting this out there. :laugh:

IMG_0216.jpeg


This is probably relevant since the narrative now is that the NHLPA has done some great job here unearthing this investigation.
 
I mean they had a direct line to Hayes last year and they said as much that's he's a douche, but I guess they didn't have the dirt like they did with Babcock.


Even when the flags are bright red, this league still finds a way to cycle through the same 40 coaches at a given time.
Red flags just look like flags when you're wearing rose coloured glasses.
 
Gonna be very interesting seeing how other Lumbus players react to Jenner and Gaudreau after all of this, where I'm sure they feel like both players silenced their issues and problems.

I have no f***ing clue how Jarmo still has a job.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GapToothedWonder
Gonna be very interesting seeing how other Lumbus players react to Jenner and Gaudreau after all of this, where I'm sure they feel like both players silenced their issues and problems.

I have no f***ing clue how Jarmo still has a job.
I suspect that there will be a league wide reaction to these events at management level. Babcock aside, TPTB in the sport are not going to take this embarrassment lightly. What’s at stake here is who has control of the actions of the franchise- the players or management?I
It could end up with players having black marks on their reputations. Bissonnette will get iced by some franchises and be lucky to get to make ads for cheap vodka. Like we’ve seen with the Flyers, the OBC does not relinquish power easily. As long as they’re the ones that are signing the checks, they have control.
 
Babcock still creepy AF eh?

I’m in a leadership role at work and I don’t give a f*** what my subordinates have on their phones. It’s not my business & it has nothing to do with work. Why would anyone want access to that?

Jarmo and Davidson should be getting their feet held to the fire by ownership over this debacle. I 100% wouldn’t sign off on a hire like this. Ownership has a hand in this too. Even a half-assed vetting process should’ve nipped this dude’s candidacy in the bud.
 
Babcock still creepy AF eh?

I’m in a leadership role at work and I don’t give a f*** what my subordinates have on their phones. It’s not my business & it has nothing to do with work. Why would anyone want access to that?

Jarmo and Davidson should be getting their feet held to the fire by ownership over this debacle. I 100% wouldn’t sign off on a hire like this. Ownership has a hand in this too. Even a half-assed vetting process should’ve nipped this dude’s candidacy in the bud.
Babcock is weird. Torts is just demanding, there is a difference.

But notice Torts never had these issues in CBJ, Jarmo is the one that tanked that franchise, and got bailed out by the Blackhawks in the Sean Jones trade. Torts is the only HC who actually was able to make CBJ a winning team.
 
Babcock is weird. Torts is just demanding, there is a difference.

But notice Torts never had these issues in CBJ, Jarmo is the one that tanked that franchise, and got bailed out by the Blackhawks in the Sean Jones trade. Torts is the only HC who actually was able to make CBJ a winning team.
You’re in the locker room? You interact with the man?

The issues were brought to light because young players were upset about it. The vets on the team defended the guy. You have NO idea what Torts does or does not do. All we know is that Torts has said himself he has a disconnect with today’s youth. Torts’ tenure in Columbus is irrelevant here.
 
You’re in the locker room? You interact with the man?
You think this sort of stuff stays hidden?

Players problem with Torts have been either PT or disliking being pushed to play harder. Some players just don't like to be pushed, others thrive under that sort of cajoling.

He's demanding, as are some other HCs, but he's a decent human being, just a pain to play for b/c he won't accept complacency.
 
And then he made them a loser. Or most coaches just exist.

Or my personal choice — most coaches just exist but some also have the threat of torpedoing your relationship with any person at any point in time.

You think this sort of stuff stays hidden?

I gotta say. I don’t understand how you can come to any other conclusion than this weird, manipulative stuff is interwoven into the hockey pseudo culture. Forget Babcock or Tortorella as individuals. This wasn’t just allowed to fester the core of hockey, it was cultivated. Insulating it was part of the identity of the community.
 
Last edited:
And then he made them a loser. Or most coaches just exist.

Or my personal choice — most coaches just exist but some also have the threat of torpedoing your relationship with any person at any point in time.



I gotta say. I don’t understand how you can come to any other conclusion than this weird, manipulative stuff is interwoven into the hockey pseudo culture. Forget Babcock or Tortorella as individuals. This wasn’t just allowed to fester the core of hockey, it was cultivated. Insulating it was part of the identity of the community.
What Babcock did was a bit over the line.

More common is the "macho man" attitudes that led to concussions being downplayed in all sport until the medical evidence was overwhelming, and the mysognist and racist attitudes that pervaded male sports beginning in Junior High, combined with a sense of entitlement as talented players face a different standard of behavior b/c coaches at lower levels depend on their play for their jobs.

The difference the past couple decades is a combination of money and media attention, when sports were less lucrative and sportswriters more embedded, things were swept under the rug - but now no league wants to alienate the TV audience and kill the golden goose. And there are so many outlets for stories that nothing can be buried anymore if a player wants to get it out there, whether under his name or anonymously.
 
What Babcock did was a bit over the line.

More common is the "macho man" attitudes that led to concussions being downplayed in all sport until the medical evidence was overwhelming, and the mysognist and racist attitudes that pervaded male sports beginning in Junior High, combined with a sense of entitlement as talented players face a different standard of behavior b/c coaches at lower levels depend on their play for their jobs.

The difference the past couple decades is a combination of money and media attention, when sports were less lucrative and sportswriters more embedded, things were swept under the rug - but now no league wants to alienate the TV audience and kill the golden goose. And there are so many outlets for stories that nothing can be buried anymore if a player wants to get it out there, whether under his name or anonymously.

That last sentence is the rub. If a player wants to get it out there. There are plenty of ways anonymous can turn into the opposite at the drop of a hat or punishments can be meted out silently. We’ll never know the extent of the rot because the consequences of being the finger pointer can be catastrophic to your career. It’s important to note that “can be catastrophic” is the relevant bar here rather than “will be” because every person in that situation is going to weigh the risk differently. It’s all too easy to talk tough with other people’s money and lives.

I don’t believe for this secondary wave of response is anything other than PR control for exactly the reasons you stated. There’s no great undertaking. The response every time is to spackle over a hole and keep cashing the tv checks.

Hell, look at the Blackhawks circus. I’m not comparing the actual behavior. Just the organizational responses.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad