Miscellaneous NHL Discussion XCIII: Spring has Sprung

Which Team's Post-Season Bandwagon are You Joining? (79+ points listed as of March 29)

  • Boston

    Votes: 1 2.4%
  • Carolina

    Votes: 13 31.7%
  • New Jersey

    Votes: 3 7.3%
  • Vegas

    Votes: 1 2.4%
  • NY Rangers

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Toronto

    Votes: 2 4.9%
  • Los Angeles

    Votes: 2 4.9%
  • Minnesota

    Votes: 3 7.3%
  • Edmonton

    Votes: 8 19.5%
  • Colorado

    Votes: 2 4.9%
  • Dallas

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Tampa Bay

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Seattle

    Votes: 1 2.4%
  • NY Islanders

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Winnipeg

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Calgary

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Nashville

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Pittsburgh

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Florida

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • None, the Flyers aren't in it

    Votes: 4 9.8%
  • A team not listed should they make the post-season

    Votes: 1 2.4%

  • Total voters
    41
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
50,931
22,193
Interesting the change started in 2017-18. That's when the league started enforcing rules on slashing, grabbing, interference, etc. more strictly.
The changes before then, eliminating the red line on two line passes, smaller goalie equipment, etc. had a far smaller impact.

The recent jump in scoring probably reflects the league accepting the changes are permanent, and thus changing their player evaluation and scouting, which would take 3-4 years to bear fruit (i.e. an 18 year old drafted in 2018 would be 22 in 2022-23 and in his first to third season).

The counter move will be faster players in the bottom six, able to more closely check the smaller, quicker players favored in the new enforcement regime. Big guys who can't skate are being phased out. The average weight has declined by 5-10 lbs the last five years.
 

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
130,351
170,877
Armored Train
Interesting the change started in 2017-18. That's when the league started enforcing rules on slashing, grabbing, interference, etc. more strictly.
The changes before then, eliminating the red line on two line passes, smaller goalie equipment, etc. had a far smaller impact.

The recent jump in scoring probably reflects the league accepting the changes are permanent, and thus changing their player evaluation and scouting, which would take 3-4 years to bear fruit (i.e. an 18 year old drafted in 2018 would be 22 in 2022-23 and in his first to third season).

The counter move will be faster players in the bottom six, able to more closely check the smaller, quicker players favored in the new enforcement regime. Big guys who can't skate are being phased out. The average weight has declined by 5-10 lbs the last five years.

It also matches the timeframe where kids and teenagers who could focus more on skill and creativity than keeping their head up start hitting the league
 

landsbergfan

Registered User
Jun 20, 2018
6,813
24,262
It is just sinking in how dumb Columbus and Chicago are for blowing the #1 pick seeding. I guess I am okay with him going to Anaheim over either of those two, but having McDavid and Bedard on the west coast is a crime.

There honestly isnt a single team that can get him that I want him to go to
 
  • Like
Reactions: VladDrag and Magua

Magua

Entirely Palatable Product
Apr 25, 2016
38,648
160,973
Huron of the Lakes
It is just sinking in how dumb Columbus and Chicago are for blowing the #1 pick seeding. I guess I am okay with him going to Anaheim over either of those two, but having McDavid and Bedard on the west coast is a crime.

There honestly isnt a single team that can get him that I want him to go to

It’s really Anaheim or I’ll be mad. Scratch that: Columbus is fine by me too. I really have no animosity directed towards that team or fanbase — frankly, they’ve put up with a lot of crap. Also, the idea of Columbus getting Gaudreau AND Bedard (“Did you want the Flyers to sign Gaudreau or tank?!”) is such a funny idea that makes the Flyers look like dumbasses in every way. I don’t think the Flyers will be competitive until Bedard retires, so that part doesn’t concern me.

Chicago and Montreal are worst case. Anyone below the Flyers is next worst case, mainly the Capitals. Arizona/Houston just sounds like a waste of his talents, but that’s an NHL problem, not a personal gripe. I wouldn’t normally care about the Sharks either, but I have a Sharks friend, and I can’t watch that gloat fest.
 

Strawberry Fields

12x Calder Cup Champs
Sep 29, 2017
9,129
29,554
Central PA
Looks like the Pens did indeed fire Sully and he already found another job.
20230415_184546.jpg
 

Curufinwe

Registered User
Feb 28, 2013
56,992
45,406
In Brind'Amour's interview with Friedman he said that the Selke definition had changed in the last 25 years to reflect the best two-way forward instead of the best defensive forward.

Makes sense given who has won it in that time frame, for the most part, though the best two-way forward of this generation is also the best defensive forward of this generation....
Listening to him talk was like chalk and cheese compared to BS we get from the phony tough guy Tortorella.
 

GapToothedWonder

Registered User
Dec 20, 2013
5,349
9,197
Paris of the Praries


The league is starting to catch on as a whole.

I think one of the biggest changes is that there is a generation of defenceman that have grown up their whole lives after the 2004 lockout rule changes. Before those changes there would routinely be 2-4 or more guys on the ice that effectively weren't offensive threats. Now even the depth defenceman are largely able to help facilitate offensive flow. Not all at a great level, but it's not like 20 years ago where a lot of teams better defenceman might as well have no crossed center ice.

It's just going to keep accelerating too, if you can't produce offense as a defenceman at lower levels you aren't going to be looked at as a draft worthy prospect.

...at least by teams that aren't run by dinosaurs.
 

Ghosts Beer

I saw Goody Fletcher with the Devil!
Feb 10, 2014
22,767
16,523
Interesting the change started in 2017-18. That's when the league started enforcing rules on slashing, grabbing, interference, etc. more strictly.
The changes before then, eliminating the red line on two line passes, smaller goalie equipment, etc. had a far smaller impact.

The recent jump in scoring probably reflects the league accepting the changes are permanent, and thus changing their player evaluation and scouting, which would take 3-4 years to bear fruit (i.e. an 18 year old drafted in 2018 would be 22 in 2022-23 and in his first to third season).

The counter move will be faster players in the bottom six, able to more closely check the smaller, quicker players favored in the new enforcement regime. Big guys who can't skate are being phased out. The average weight has declined by 5-10 lbs the last five years.
I think equipment is the #1 factor.

Stricter goalie equipment limitations, combined with continued advancements for skaters which makes them skate faster & shoot quicker & harder.

Secondarily, I think defenders know they’ll get called for penalties on slashing-type defensive plays that they formerly used to prevent scoring chances.
 

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
130,351
170,877
Armored Train
I think one of the biggest changes is that there is a generation of defenceman that have grown up their whole lives after the 2004 lockout rule changes. Before those changes there would routinely be 2-4 or more guys on the ice that effectively weren't offensive threats. Now even the depth defenceman are largely able to help facilitate offensive flow. Not all at a great level, but it's not like 20 years ago where a lot of teams better defenceman might as well have no crossed center ice.

It's just going to keep accelerating too, if you can't produce offense as a defenceman at lower levels you aren't going to be looked at as a draft worthy prospect.

...at least by teams that aren't run by dinosaurs.

Not a coincidence that a ton of the most effective offensive defensemen came up in the 80s and 90s before the DPE. The DPE is hockey's dark age and it took the game a decade to recover.
 

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
50,931
22,193
I think one of the biggest changes is that there is a generation of defenceman that have grown up their whole lives after the 2004 lockout rule changes. Before those changes there would routinely be 2-4 or more guys on the ice that effectively weren't offensive threats. Now even the depth defenceman are largely able to help facilitate offensive flow. Not all at a great level, but it's not like 20 years ago where a lot of teams better defenceman might as well have no crossed center ice.

It's just going to keep accelerating too, if you can't produce offense as a defenceman at lower levels you aren't going to be looked at as a draft worthy prospect.

...at least by teams that aren't run by dinosaurs.
Things will stabilize, sports is empirical game theory at its best.

Just look at last year's POs, both TB and Colorado employed a tight checking game using speed to harass opposing offenses. That will spread throughout the league, guys who can skate and defend will be valued higher b/c they can slow down those smurf offenses.

The players who will drop in value are offensive players without the speed to compete at a NHL level, as the game gets faster, their windows get smaller. And of course the big lumbering guys, but they've already been devalued, though L Schenn keeps getting employed. What has changed is the minimal threshold in terms of skating and agility. Big D-men who are decent skaters will still have jobs.

There is still a limited supply of offensively talented players, the supply expanded as the new rule enforcement enabled smaller players to compete, but there are only so many with the agility, vision and skills to thrive even in the new NHL.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Ad

Ad