Saros has never started more than 35 games (23, 27, 34, 35 though last two seasons were truncated), .895 in the bubble playoffs, .921 this year's playoffs. He's had a much better defense in front of him than Hart.
GAA - xGA/60 (all situations):
2020-21: -0.17 / +0.18 in the PO
2019-20: +0.16 / +1.20 in the PO
2018-19: -0.05
2017-18: -0.49
He's 26, he's a solid starter, but would you trade Hart for him straight up?
Saros is more reliable but has had a chance to develop in a low pressure situation behind an elite defensive corp.
Hart has had higher highs (a great PO performance) and a much lower low, but I'd say has both more risk and more upside.
I can smell a bad faith argument a mile away, and this my friend, is a bad faith argument.
Hart has started more than 30 games
once. Saros has started 27, 34, 35 games the last 3 seasons compared to Hart's 30, 40, 25 games. Saros has a much better defense in front of him......if you ignore the Flyers had a lower all-situations xGA/60 than Nashville
last season. And then you have to conveniently ignore they were top 5 two seasons ago, where Hart performed as one of the top goalies in the league. We have goaltender stats that account for play in front. Saros had the 7th best GSAA/60 last season; he was 15th and 13th in the seasons before that. Again, Rinne was one of the worst 7 goalies behind the same defense.
Trading Hart for Jaros has less than zero to do with this discussion. A discussion concerning a contract ($5 mil) for one of the most consistent netminders in the league, with 3 UFA seasons. And an RFA 2nd contract (~$4 mil) for 2 seasons for a goalie who was just the worst in the league. That I believe Hart can right the ship isn't the topic at hand regarding value. And I'm certainly not doing a jig comparing his contract to Saros'.