NHL Talk Miscellaneous NHL Discussion CIX: Processing a Tremendous Amount of Insane Information

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Tippett had two RFA seasons left, so add in his 2 RFA seasons already played, and you get $5.2M for ten years v $7.5M for 8 years, in both cases, including 4 RFA seasons.

That's why you just can't compare contracts in a vacuum, big difference between player entering his UFA season negotiating an extension and a player with multiple RFA seasons left.
Exactly what point are you trying to make here? You're moving goal posts to win an arguement against yourself about which contract Is better? One makes 6.25, the other makes 7.5, previous contracts mean absolutely f*** all lol

One is a better overall player than the other, that's the difference
 
I’m rounding a bit here, but there are roughly two Popes per square kilometer in the Vatican.
1526876760066.gif
 
Exactly what point are you trying to make here? You're moving goal posts to win an arguement against yourself about which contract Is better? One makes 6.25, the other makes 7.5, previous contracts mean absolutely f*** all lol

One is a better overall player than the other, that's the difference
My point was if you want to determine if a contract is "reasonable," you have to look at the context.

So Jarvis got $7.5M, which would be a bargain if he was a free agent, but with 4 RFA seasons left, no so much.

Same way Tippett got $6.2M with 2 RFA seasons left, so Flyers got 2 RFA seasons for a total of $3M.

So the comparison isn't $7.5M to $6.2M, but to $5.2M, the cost to the Flyers including the 2 RFA seasons they got at a bargain. Both teams are buying out 4 RFA seasons, Flyers just bought 2 early.
 
Talking about Tippett as if he was a 55 goal scorer is weird when it took him 155 games to get there.

I like the player and never minded the Giroux trade, but he hasn't shown anything close to elite impact on the ice yet.
 
My point was if you want to determine if a contract is "reasonable," you have to look at the context.

So Jarvis got $7.5M, which would be a bargain if he was a free agent, but with 4 RFA seasons left, no so much.

Same way Tippett got $6.2M with 2 RFA seasons left, so Flyers got 2 RFA seasons for a total of $3M.

So the comparison isn't $7.5M to $6.2M, but to $5.2M, the cost to the Flyers including the 2 RFA seasons they got at a bargain. Both teams are buying out 4 RFA seasons, Flyers just bought 2 early.
No, the comparison is what they signed for. Trying to rationalize it any other way just tries to complicate a simple process. Yes, the comparison is 7.5 to 6.2 as that is all that matters at the end of the day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kelmitchell2
Draisaitl will be 30-37 over the life of the deal.
Even with the cap hitting $100M in 4 years, that's still 14% of your cap.
 
Talking about Tippett as if he was a 55 goal scorer is weird when it took him 155 games to get there.

I like the player and never minded the Giroux trade, but he hasn't shown anything close to elite impact on the ice yet.

I don't know if this line of discussion has been a function of needing to defend everything management does to an extreme, or a function of management building such a shitty group of talent since 2018 that it makes basic top-6 level players stand out too much.
 

One of a couple sites that appear to be reporting on this; the original is apparently from a Francophone podcast.

The deal, as reported here, was Laine for Johansen's contract even up, with CBJ planning to put RyJo on LTIR.
 

One of a couple sites that appear to be reporting on this; the original is apparently from a Francophone podcast.

The deal, as reported here, was Laine for Johansen's contract even up, with CBJ planning to put RyJo on LTIR.
Thanks. I hadn’t seen that. Like Curu posted above, I don’t know where the cap space for this would come from.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad