Miscellaneous NHL Discussion C: The centenarian of threads

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates

The 2024 Stanley Cup winner will be...

  • Boston

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Buffalo

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Calgary

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Chicago

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Columbus

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Detroit

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Edmonton

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Florida

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Los Angeles

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Minnesota

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Nashville

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • New York Islanders

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • New York Rangers

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Pittsburgh

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Seattle

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • St. Louis

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Tampa Bay

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Vancouver

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Washington

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Winnipeg

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    41
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.


It’s not going to work here because it’s Tortorella, but we’re now in the area where smart teams should be calling on Kent Johnson. You have to find out just how done they are.


Pretty simple Jojo. He isn't carrying the mail.


Yes, this is my new favorite line and yes i am absolutely going to abuse it because of its stupidit.
 
I wanted to pull my hair out watching this video. :laugh:



2.5 minutes talking about a possible 1st overall prospect, and there isn’t ONE thing said about his actual game. It’s cliches, small sample obsession, and made-up psychology. I got dumber for having watched this.

Any time someone makes a comment about professional scouts knowing better, I want that person to consume a wheel of maggot cheese.

This is gold

They let him talk for minutes (hours?!) with his glasses resting on his forehead?
 
I wanted to pull my hair out watching this video. :laugh:



2.5 minutes talking about a possible 1st overall prospect, and there isn’t ONE thing said about his actual game. It’s cliches, small sample obsession, and made-up psychology. I got dumber for having watched this.

Any time someone makes a comment about professional scouts knowing better, I want that person to consume a wheel of maggot cheese.

i am so mad

 
I wanted to pull my hair out watching this video. :laugh:



2.5 minutes talking about a possible 1st overall prospect, and there isn’t ONE thing said about his actual game. It’s cliches, small sample obsession, and made-up psychology. I got dumber for having watched this.

Any time someone makes a comment about professional scouts knowing better, I want that person to consume a wheel of maggot cheese.

Damn, cooked

 
Now I’m trying to understand how to evaluate Keith Jones given he knows how to wear glasses properly.
EAZ9om-X4AApM1N.jpg:small
 


I'm putting this here because I've seen people questioning the Gauthier shot from distance talking point. Even the best Goal scorer on the planet does significantly better when he comes in more. It has nothing to do with Gauthier.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad