Confirmed Signing with Link: [MIN] Kirill Kaprizov re-signs with the Wild (5 years, $9M AAV)

Dr Robot

Registered User
Nov 3, 2011
1,631
1,377
If it was only based on his small NHL sample size Id say this was probably a bad gamble. Looking at his KHL stats and age, last year probably wasn't a fluky season and this is who he is. Kid will probably be a 70+ point player on the Wild of all teams.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vipers31

Osakahaus

Chillin' on Fuji
May 28, 2021
8,479
4,150
That’s ridiculous.

1 sub PPG season in the NHL and you get 9 million per year with term that takes you right to UFA?
upload_2021-9-21_18-47-23.png

have you seen the way that kaprizov plays? He does deserve the money
 

KidLine93

Registered User
May 15, 2012
5,928
2,136
Minny couldn't let him leave. Expensive but hope he's worth it. His play style is very exciting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JBeast

CaliforniaBlues310

Registered User
Apr 9, 2013
4,743
3,747
San Pedro, CA.
Seems like an overpayment for just 55 NHL games played.

He had 33 pts in 32 games with a +18 against 4 bottom feeder teams(ARI/ANA/LA/SJ), and 18pts with a -8 in 23 against COL/STL/VGK. He also wasn’t too much of a factor in the playoffs either, with just 3 points in that 7 game series.

I’m curious to see how he performs in a full 82 against the entire league, especially now that he has more tape on how he plays.
 

HockeyVirus

Woll stan.
Nov 15, 2020
19,422
29,686
What if he scores 90?

if your hypothetical is true, yes, awful. If he scores 100 though, it'll be a pretty okay contract.

Come on guys... Let's be realistic he isn't sniffing those numbers. He shot at 17% for 55 games. Of those 55 games, 32 of them were against Anaheim, SJ, Arizona, and LA.

This is a terrible deal that is going to backfire hard.
 

Inno

Registered User
Jan 14, 2007
373
68
Calgary
Billy G getting wrecked at the negotiating table hahahahah. $9 Mil after 55 games with no leverage other than playing in mother russia for $1 mil US. aka $9 mil rubles.
 

HyperX

Fire Ruff and co. !
Jul 21, 2021
1,917
1,313
Even if this ends up being a bad contract, who cares? It ends in five years, we're not going to be relevant for those five years anyway. There's very little actual practical risk in this deal.
Why keep him then? Trade him for assets that will be good when you're relevant again

not sign him to UFA
 

CupsOverCash

Registered User
Jun 16, 2009
16,531
7,298
He will probably produce close to what that deserves and they needed to sign him. Its less than what anyone wants to do at this point but you aren't gonna let him walk at the same time.
 

Reality Czech

Registered User
Apr 17, 2017
5,823
9,408
lol I don't want to hear 1 more word about Marner. 5 years, 9 million for a guy with a half a season of games. Unreal.

Two wrongs don't make a right?

But Kaprizov has way more leverage over the Wild than Marner had over the Leafs. The kids are gettin' paid, folks!
 

Mikeshane

Registered User
Jan 15, 2013
6,175
3,924
Nice to see Minnesota get him signed, they deserve an exciting star maybe more than any other fan base.

Having him signed means they are in win now mode and with that in mind combined with all the buyout money they have committed they are going to have to be the NHL equivalent of an extreme couponer getting 37 boxes of Cornflakes for 10 cents.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad