Value of: Mike Matheson to Vancouver

Kennerback

Registered User
Jun 2, 2021
4,610
6,900
Canucks ARE a good team as a whole. But that defense past Hughes (and Hronek when he's healthy) is a real dogs breakfast.
Matheson would add offense from the back end. But Canucks already have the guns They’re just not firing at the level they should be. The team needs a big bucket of ice water to wake up.
 

jfhabs

Registered User
May 21, 2015
5,190
2,645
are you taking habs fan out for dinner before screwing us?

62 pts last year, on pace for 50 this year.
Overplayed as a no 1 or 2 but an excellent 2nd pairing dman
with elite skating, some grit - but sometimes questionable hockey sense...
but he's a hab so obviously he has very little worth to the usual crowd.
:thumbu:

:santa:
Heard to same with Toffoli, Lehkonen, Chiarot, Kulak, Monahan, Allen, etc. Crickets passed the TDL
 

RationalExpectations

Registered User
May 12, 2019
5,291
4,124
Matheson would add offense from the back end. But Canucks already have the guns They’re just not firing at the level they should be. The team needs a big bucket of ice water to wake up.

Canucks don t have any puck mover behind Hughes. Add Hronek injury and you end up with Myers Soucy Juulsen Forbort Brannstorm behind Hughes…

Matheson would help them keep the puck in the Ozone more than they do today in my opinion.
 

mrinsane

Registered User
Dec 8, 2005
2,298
57
Matheson is a #2-#3 d-man so the return would be a 1rst, b prospect and Desharnais who seems to be a cap dump at this point
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad