Trade for McDavid?
*insert Russell Peters dads voice* "somebody's going to get hurt real bad"
*insert Russell Peters dads voice* "somebody's going to get hurt real bad"
The only team worth consider trading with is colorado
MacKinnon + Makar + 1st 2023 (the year)
for ConnorMcDavid
Ed, stop w/the win now. Come back from the dark side. You're smarter than that.
Connor McDavid
Alexis Lafreniere
Kaapo Kakko
Filip Chytil
Nils Lundkvist
Alexandar Georgiev
McDavid isn’t close to being worth that package. His value isn’t much more than Mac.The only team worth consider trading with is colorado
MacKinnon + Makar + 1st 2023 (the year)
for ConnorMcDavid
A 50% retained McJesus has a value so high that I legitimately think there isn't a team in the league who could pay for it.Edmonton needs to retain 50%. NYR can't take on that cap.
I don't agree what Makar is nearly as valuable as McDavid, I do agree the difference between Mac and McDavid is NOT Makar and a 1stLmao why would Colorado ever do this.
Arguably the 3rd best player + arguably the 1st best defenceman + 1st rounder
for
Arguably the 1st best player in the league
Doesn't really add up. Makar alone is nearly as valuable as McDavid is. Same with MacKinnon. They are all top 5 assets in the league.
I mean, I would probably do it.Hard pass. NYR offer starts with Zib+Lafreniere and keep on adding from there.
I don't agree what Makar is nearly as valuable as McDavid, I do agree the difference between Mac and McDavid is NOT Makar and a 1st
drop the 1st for COL and EDM add someone like Broberg or something maybe?
not trying to slight him at all. he's a fantastic player, but his value isn't close to McDavidHe has 16 goals in 34 games as a 23 year old defenceman.
Fox + Zib execute nmc and refuse to go.Fox
Zibby
Laf
Oilers choice of prospect
Draft capital
Salary releif
LA can do a better offer of Byfield ++++A comparable offer from LA would probably look like:
Byfield
Turcotte
Kupari
Bjornfot
Petersen
Which, in my opinion, isn't enough for McDavid.
Fair pt, but the premise is like Leafs, a team w/too much top heavy and not enuf depth is not as likely to win as some would think. There is also the risk that if McD does extend well before, they are going up vs a scenario where he may want out, and that means doing this ugly may be unavoidable, so a reset now may make some more sense.I just can't imagine a world where the Oilers brass decides that they can't win with the best player in the world. If you can't win with him, why can you win without him? Just would never happen outside of McDavid literally saying he will never play another game for them again.
The offer does sting. You want certainty, not upside of potential. Not everyone has that, and not every such player is available for trade w/o waiver of nmc/ntc.Don't care what position your players were drafted. You don't get the best player in the NHL for a bunch of maybezzzz & under performing youth. If you are trading for Connor its gonna sting a little, don't you think? Think about a few of your players that you don't want to jettison. Even with our shit management, I don't think they would even remotely entertain what you are offering.
Agree. That said, NY + Oil both should not.NYR is a fair proposal. Forget about Fox or Trouba, they won’t play in EDM. Don’t believe NYR has the cap to make this work.
COL is not happening. Mackinnon is far superior in the playoffs and cheaper. Makar is nearly at the same level.
EDM won’t get a better proposal than the NYR.
If Zib could be dealt as a major component of value involved, sure, that would make more sense but unfortunately, nmc.Hard pass. NYR offer starts with Zib+Lafreniere and keep on adding from there.
Believe it or not, I'm actually not against trading anyone on our team. As a base, I would want a center to "replace" McDavid (Zibby, ya he has a NMC so likely not realistic) & a legit stud D (Fox) back in any deal (I'm not as big of a Nurse fan as most)...and obviously other pieces would need to be added in to even out cap & to even out the deal. I personally would prefer to deal with a team offering up a stud goalie over anything in a legit McDavid proposal, but I understand that is wildly imaginative at best. Is there a realistic offer to be had between our teams? Doubtful. Fox didn't want to sign with the Flames, so there's no chance he is itching to come to Edmonton & Zib is not okaying a move to this dumpster fire.I personally would be willing to part with Fox in the deal, but I don't want to be raked over the coals by my fellow Ranger fans lol. I feel I may have less attachment to him than others given that I'm not from NY, so the hometown kid story doesn't matter quite as much to me. What if that proposal swapped Lafreniere with Fox? What would be your ask personally? I know based on your username you probably don't wish to trade him lol, but if you saw BREAKING NEWS MCDAVID TRADED TO NYR, what are you reasonably hoping that deal is?
yeesh, not one guy is a top NHL player going back to the Oil
Connor McDavid
Alexis Lafreniere
Kaapo Kakko
Filip Chytil
Nils Lundkvist
Alexandar Georgiev
LA can do a better offer of Byfield ++++
Never said LA couldn't, I was just approximating OP's value into a Kings proposal.
For LA to actually land McDavid, it starts with Byfield, Turcotte, and Clarke, and continues from there.
Lmao why would Colorado ever do this.
Arguably the 3rd best player + arguably the 1st best defenceman + 1st rounder
for
Arguably the 1st best player in the league
Doesn't really add up. Makar alone is nearly as valuable as McDavid is. Same with MacKinnon. They are all top 5 assets in the league.
Colorado adds a first to an already vast overpayment?The only team worth consider trading with is colorado
MacKinnon + Makar + 1st 2023 (the year)
for ConnorMcDavid
See, he might be theoretically worth that but Colorado would never make that trade. It actually makes them worse. I think if any trade for McDavid happens somewhere down the line, Edmonton fans might be disappointed with the return. Teams aren't going to gut their rosters to get McDavid because I don't think it makes them a better team. That's the goal to become a better team. Would Colorado be better team with McDavid instead of Mack but no Makar? I doubt it very much. It's a very tricky trade to make that's for sure.
again no while we wait for this thread to die a natural deathTry Shesterkin and Fox +
Colorado adds a first to an already vast overpayment?
I watched them both in the SHL. Lundqvist was one of the best defensemen in the league while being a junior. Björnfot, not so much.Perhaps offensively, although Lundkvist's 4 points in 25 games this season sure didn't set the world on fire. Bjornfot is better defensively, is a year younger, and has more NHL experience.