Value of: Maxime Comtois

[jfhabs]

It would be something like Guhle. i.e. It would hurt.

Well , that's not happening from any team in my opinion.
Comtois has 2 goals in 31 games this year, even shooting at 15% he'd have 6... you'd also give up 4 years of team control.
If Guhle reaches his mid range potential as a physical number 4 D, you're looking at a very lopsided in Anaheim's favor.

 

[Eggtimer]

Asking again . What off of the Devils could work ?
Zacha + or Ty Smith + or D prospect or ?

 

[Big Empty]

It would be something like Guhle. i.e. It would hurt.

Guhle for Comtois? Pass.

 

[L4br3cqu3]

It would be something like Guhle. i.e. It would hurt.

Guhle for Comtois... ?

Come on.

 

[Montecristo]

Debrusk for comtois type trade?

 

[Habs10025]

Unlikely Montreal trade for Comtois.

 

[Monsieur Verdoux]

Asking again . What off of the Devils could work ?
Zacha + or Ty Smith + or D prospect or ?

Why the Devils should pay extra if they trade Zacha for Comtois? Comtois is a little bit younger than Zacha, but Zacha is more proven than Comtois. Comtois is a wild card here, because he has had only one good season so far.

 

[HOPE]

Caufield For Comtois is something to really think about, But it's a hard sell to all habs Fan's because they love Caufield alot. I like Caufield also but I would really think hard about a trade like this.

sleep on it, let me know when you have an answer.
















says zero GMs

 

[Raccoon Jesus]

Well , that's not happening from any team in my opinion.
Comtois has 2 goals in 31 games this year, even shooting at 15% he'd have 6... you'd also give up 4 years of team control.
If Guhle reaches his mid range potential as a physical number 4 D, you're looking at a very lopsided in Anaheim's favor.

So you want the value of the Ducks selling low on Comtois while you want the full value of what Guhle can become.

Do you see why that's unreasonable?

All other stuff aside, Ducks would be foolish to sell low on Comtois.

 

[jfhabs]

So you want the value of the Ducks selling low on Comtois while you want the full value of what Guhle can become.

Do you see why that's unreasonable?

All other stuff aside, Ducks would be foolish to sell low on Comtois.

I don't see it as selling low. Just average Comtois total game and pts from last year and this season, you have a 35 pts player at 23yo. I think it's a fair assessment right now, much better then saying he's a 60pts guy based on last year or a 15pts guy based on this season.

I mentioned I saw him as a 45-50pts 2nd line winger while I see Poehling as a 30-35pts 2way center. Like I said I like Poehling a lot and I also added a good defense prospect.

Not sure what youre talking about in terms of full value for Guhle? Do you mean peak potential? I dont think is peak potential is #4 defenseman, I think it's the reasonable outcome, just like Comtois is likely going to end up a 45-50 pts winger. How is that unreasonable !?

 

[BLNY]

We will take Caufield for him since he didn't work out in the first 10 games either.

Pretty much this. His name coming up on Saturday night was out of left field. He lead the team in scoring last year. If he did hit market, the Ducks would be doing so from a sell-low position. Best thing to do is keep him imo.

 

[Number1RedWingsFan52]

Outside of his 33 points in 55 games last season, His numbers have been abysmal not much better then Zadina's. I'd do Zadina 1 for 1 for Comtois.

 

[LazyT]

Delete.

 

[KevSkillz4]

It would be something like Guhle. i.e. It would hurt.

Guhle? No way. This guy have top pairing potential.

You can keep Comtois if you want Caufield or Guhle... Habs never going to trade young players like that for Comtois.

 

[Raccoon Jesus]

I don't see it as selling low. Just average Comtois total game and pts from last year and this season, you have a 35 pts player at 23yo. I think it's a fair assessment right now, much better then saying he's a 60pts guy based on last year or a 15pts guy based on this season.

I mentioned I saw him as a 45-50pts 2nd line winger while I see Poehling as a 30-35pts 2way center. Like I said I like Poehling a lot and I also added a good defense prospect.

Not sure what youre talking about in terms of full value for Guhle? Do you mean peak potential? I dont think is peak potential is #4 defenseman, I think it's the reasonable outcome, just like Comtois is likely going to end up a 45-50 pts winger. How is that unreasonable !?

That's...not at all what you said. Did you forget? This is your literal direct quote

Well , that's not happening from any team in my opinion.
Comtois has 2 goals in 31 games this year, even shooting at 15% he'd have 6... you'd also give up 4 years of team control.
If Guhle reaches his mid range potential as a physical number 4 D, you're looking at a very lopsided in Anaheim's favor.

You evaluated Comtois as if this were his only season and said he wouldn't even be worth a mid-range Guhle.

My point is only it's hypocritical to trade for one guys bottom results and ignore potential while suggesting the guy with no NHL games is a sure thing so he's automatically worth more.

If that's not what you were saying...then say it better.

 

[jfhabs]

That's...not at all what you said. Did you forget? This is your literal direct quote



You evaluated Comtois as if this were his only season and said he wouldn't even be worth a mid-range Guhle.

My point is only it's hypocritical to trade for one guys bottom results and ignore potential while suggesting the guy with no NHL games is a sure thing so he's automatically worth more.

If that's not what you were saying...then say it better.

I didn't, sorry that's what you understood. I actually did the complete opposite, not ignoring potential, last season, this season, etc. Just that it was in a few different posts.

Read better


You ask me to say it better, yet come up with syatment like this : "So you want the value of the Ducks selling low on Comtois while you want the full value of what Guhle can become"

 

[Gurglesons]

I could easily see this being the opposite of the Kase deal where Anaheim adds a tiny bit and gets a legit wing instead of Backes.

 

[Zegs2sendhelp]

So you want the value of the Ducks selling low on Comtois while you want the full value of what Guhle can become.

Do you see why that's unreasonable?

All other stuff aside, Ducks would be foolish to sell low on Comtois.

Hab fans are the worst, I just ignore them in trade boards

 

[Zegs2sendhelp]

I could easily see this being the opposite of the Kase deal where Anaheim adds a tiny bit and gets a legit wing instead of Backes.

Suggested in a diff thread but comtois +(+) for fiala

 

[Gurglesons]

Suggested in a diff thread but comtois +(+) for fiala

That’ll likely be a hefty +, but does Anaheim really need a 15th to 20th overall 1st or Fiala?

 

[rt]

Comtois+Zellweger+1st for Chychrun?

 

[Leonardo87]

Picked up an assist last night and looked like his last season self. Ducks should not be giving up on this guy but if they do trade him will be for the right price, dude still has so much potential.

 

[Prairie Habs]

Hab fans are the worst, I just ignore them in trade boards

Habs fan: Would you trade your struggling young player for our struggling young player?

Ducks fan: No, you would have to give us your best prospect

Habs fan: But our best prospect might end up being really good

Ducks fan: How dare you judge a prospect on his potential

Other ducks fan: Yeah, Habs fans are the worst


So, if we aren't allowed to judge prospects based on potential I guess we'll set our sights on 3 points in 9 games Mason McTavish. Rem Pitlick is a little over 0.5 PPG this year, so if you guys throw in a pick that would be a solid trade.

 

[JustAHabFan]

Why would Habs trade Caufield or Guhle for Maximum Comatose?

 

[Glen Sathers Cigar]

The only way I see this happening is for another player in a similar situation. Not sure what ANA wants though... doesn't seem like the right time

Kravtsov from the Rangers maybe?