What i'm telling you is simply fact.
Highest scoring players in the KHL were 89 then 79
NHL was 144,142,130 and 10 over 100.
I'm just presenting facts. NHL is much higher scoring league. Kucherov is NOT putting up 144 over there, not even close. KHL is just a more defensive oriented league.
Obviously the NHL is the best league in the world and the talent level isn't close, it's just a different product that doesn't translate well at all when you're just looking at points.
If that were the case you would have to say that the 15 best goalies in the world all play in the KHL due to their GAA and SV%
Well, first of all, the KHL play a maximum of 68 games, so you have to look at points per game when comparing player production in both leagues.
There were 5 players that paced at around 100 pts over 82 games in the KHL. One of them is Weal who produced at a 96 pts pace. Do you really think that Weal would come close to that number in the NHL if he was given a top line role?
Put McDavid, Mackinnon, Kucherov, Draisaitl, etc. in the KHL, and you'll have a lot more 100+ pts players there.
Kucherov may or may not score at a 144 pts pace over 82 games in the KHL, but if he doesn't its because he won't be playing with the elite linemates (Point, Stamkos, Hedman) he had in Tampa. Put those 4 in the same team in the KHL, and Kucherov easily eclipses a 144 pts pace.
In the case, of Michkov vs Bedard, neither had a good team or good linemates. So neither benefited from playing with good talent.
It is true that the KHL is more defensive than the NHL, but that doesn't make up for the fact that Michkov is by far more skilled than anyone else in the KHL. Bedard is very skilled, but the disparity between his talent and that of other NHL players is not as big. It's the reason why someone like Weal can put up big numbers in the KHL. His skill level is average to below average compared to NHL players, but it's high end compared to KHL players.