If he bombs out, they won't need to buy him out. Some GM that overvalues physical play will trade for him.
I'm getting a raging clue.
If he bombs out, they won't need to buy him out. Some GM that overvalues physical play will trade for him.
Yea in 15-16 and 17-18. He hasn't had more than 6 in any other season since, and he also hasn't broken 30 points since 17-18. 6.5M is a lot to pay a guy who had 10 or more goals twice with the most recent being 4 years ago.Didn't he have multiple yeas with double digit goals?
The poke check on Karlsson in the Vegas game really sold me on Samuelsson. This sums up Sammy's game in a nutshell.
Soooo.Mitts was extended 3 x $2.5 to be 3C. (maybe 2C) and a 4C is worth $2.8m for 4 years?????If he can prove to be a legit 4C this year 2.8 AAV is not outlandish.
We are not too far away from seeing 4th liners getting that contract, especially with the cap expected to get up to north of $90mil in the next 4-5 years.. And if Adams has show us anything this offseason, its that he wants to get contracts on the books ahead of the curve.Soooo.Mitts was extended 3 x $2.5 to be 3C. (maybe 2C) and a 4C is worth $2.8m for 4 years?????
If your 4C is more than $2-2.25m you are doing it wrong. And more than likely $1.5-$1.8 is more appropriate.
That number should increase next offseason I'm guessing as well.For context, 73 d-men currently have an AAV of $4.3M+.
The poke check on Karlsson in the Vegas game really sold me on Samuelsson. This sums up Sammy's game in a nutshell.
I have to agree. I mean he's looked ok.....just ok.Fifty. Four. NHL. Games.
Nobody knows if he's worth a 7 year contract.
Preach!I just don't get this one bit. The Sabres self scout and have a great pulse on the team finally. This guy is being targeted as someone who is already a huge team leader, good on the ice, and likely a cornerstone for a long time. The Sabres are doing something differently than the rest of the league, and trying to reward their home grown guys, and build from within. How in the universe is this and Tage's contracts anything other than building a huge foundation for this team down the road?
We've been a freaking shit hole franchise for the last decade plus, and now we start rewarding guys, and you have a problem with that? Man, Kevyn is trying a different approach that is quite honestly refreshing as hell, and for some reason, you want to do it the old way still? I'm looking at these deals, and honestly, there's not even that much risk in doing so. The greater benefit and reward far far outway the risks. Other guys on the team see this happening, and know that if they perform on and off the ice, they get rewarded too. Times are changing around here, and I'm all about it.
I mean he's looked ok.....just ok.
Craig Rivet said that Samuelsson should fire his agent. An absolute steal for the Sabres. That he'd be getting $4m per in a bridge deal next contract.
Craig Rivet said that Samuelsson should fire his agent. An absolute steal for the Sabres. That he'd be getting $4m per in a bridge deal next contract.
What he would get on a bridge after this season is an interesting conversation. At that time he’s likely looking at coming off a full year (or year and a half if you want) of being a top pairing D on this team. Im not sure that doesn’t buy him at least very close to 4 per on a bridge.I don't think Antidote would be getting $4M on his next bridge. $2-3M on a 3 year bridge would be my guess. Then he'd get PAID once the cap increases.
So yeah, Sammy left a bunch of money on the table. Maybe a good $10/15 million on his post-bridge deal, if not more.
More critically, to me at least, it shows Pegulas trust Adams, and aren't going to pester Adams into signing the next Taylor Hall unless Adams thinks it's the right move.As an aside:
I truly hope that this deal shows that the Pegulas will, in fact, pay when the time is right. That we're not a cap floor team in perpetuity.
I'd add patience to the hope and trusting above.I mean......I do get it. We've been pitifully awful for 10/11 years now. Having hope and trusting the organization is NOT an easy thing to do.
I'll buy that, pun intended for a 4C Cody Eakin. If your 4C is Asplund, he's worth more; specifically his Corsi / Fenwick is worth more.Soooo.Mitts was extended 3 x $2.5 to be 3C. (maybe 2C) and a 4C is worth $2.8m for 4 years?????
If your 4C is more than $2-2.25m you are doing it wrong. And more than likely $1.5-$1.8 is more appropriate.
I would probably look at guys like Slavin and Pesce. Samuelsson mostly played with Bryson in the third pair and only then began to play with Dahlin, naturally he will have more points in the first pair with Rasmus than in the third. I think he could very well be a 25-30 point player.What's his offensive upside? He hasn't yet scored in the NHL.
Is 5G, 20A realistic in a good season?