old kummelweck
Registered User
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2003
- Messages
- 25,870
- Likes
- 5,937
Craig Rivet said that Samuelsson should fire his agent. An absolute steal for the Sabres. That he'd be getting $4m per in a bridge deal next contract.
Craig Rivet said that Samuelsson should fire his agent. An absolute steal for the Sabres. That he'd be getting $4m per in a bridge deal next contract.
He did make me chuckle when he described Kjell.JR is about as observant as tree moss.
I guess it just depends on personality and risk tolerance. This way he has secured a huge sum of money (barring buyout) and won’t have to move around like some guys do. He traded potential future earnings for stability and still gets to have generational wealth.Craig Rivet said that Samuelsson should fire his agent. An absolute steal for the Sabres. That he'd be getting $4m per in a bridge deal next contract.
I guess it just depends on personality and risk tolerance. This way he has secured a huge sum of money (barring buyout) and won’t have to move around like some guys do. He traded potential future earnings for stability and still gets to have generational wealth.
Yet you're writing dissertation-length posts on how bad this deal is......when you say yourself that it's not the end of the world if the worst case happens.
Why? There is a good chance that in a year you would have to pay more. 54 games is not so small, why should he become a bad player? Adams also has to consider that Dahlin and Power are likely to be very high paying players in the near future and locking up a player like Samuelsson to a contract like this looks like a good investment in the future, we could use every million in a cap soon.There is zero reason to sign this contract now. It's taking a risk you didn't have to take.
Interesting thing about his father that I just realized. Back in 92 when the Pens traded Coffey to the Kings, the package they received in return included Kjell Samuelsson (His dad as we all know) and also received Jeff Chychrun (Jakobs dad). It's meaningless, but I found it interesting nonetheless.Given that he is a son of a former NHLer, I am sure he knows how things work and that he did value that stability. His dad played for 4 different teams and the Flyers twice. And who knows what his contract negotiations were like.
The worst case scenario is that he isn't a NHL d-man at all.
While I don't think that is the likely scenario,it's on the table. We don't know because.....we've only seen him in the NHL for 54 games.
There is zero reason to sign this contract now. It's taking a risk you didn't have to take.
So Girgs being career -5.9 Corsi and -5.8 Fenwick means he is re-signing for league minimum?More critically, to me at least, it shows Pegulas trust Adams, and aren't going to pester Adams into signing the next Taylor Hall unless Adams thinks it's the right move.
I'd add patience to the hope and trusting above.
I'll buy that, pun intended for a 4C Cody Eakin. If your 4C is Asplund, he's worth more; specifically his Corsi / Fenwick is worth more.
Could you give me a comparable contract that you think Samuelsson would warrant after this season? Especially considering RFA status?Why? There is a good chance that in a year you would have to pay more. 54 games is not so small, why should he become a bad player? Adams also has to consider that Dahlin and Power are likely to be very high paying players in the near future and locking up a player like Samuelsson to a contract like this looks like a good investment in the future, we could use every million in a cap soon.
It sure sounds like Samuelsson wanted a long term deal from the get go.
Given that he is a son of a former NHLer, I am sure he knows how things work and that he did value that stability. His dad played for 4 different teams and the Flyers twice. And who knows what his contract negotiations were like.
Erik Cernak. And you have to also look at the salary cap growth after a supposed bridge deal and the inflationary effect on contracts.Could you give me a comparable contract that you think Samuelsson would warrant after this season? Especially considering RFA status?
No, we know that what he does is very much as an NHL d-man. It's clear you didn't watch much last season.
They said above about Cernak, there are also defenders of a similar type who signed contracts for 5+ or 6+ million. The status of the RFA does not give anything, now it is not very profitable to sign bridge contracts, especially remembering the situation with Reinhart and the subsequent growth of the cap. In this thread on page 8, I wrote lists of different defenders and their contracts.Could you give me a comparable contract that you think Samuelsson would warrant after this season? Especially considering RFA status?
It's not meaningless -- this is a top tier tidbit!Interesting thing about his father that I just realized. Back in 92 when the Pens traded Coffey to the Kings, the package they received in return included Kjell Samuelsson (His dad as we all know) and also received Jeff Chychrun (Jakobs dad). It's meaningless, but I found it interesting nonetheless.
Your point is solid. However, the two things that give me more confidence in this are:Because young d-man haven't looked good for a 3/4 of a season and then never looked as good again? Mike Weber was great his rookie year. So did Jake McCabe. I am hopeful for Samuelsson, he DID look good last year.
You don't give 7 year deals off of 3/4 of a season. He could regress mightily this season. Or maybe once players have the book on him he'll struggle. There are so many unknowns about Samuelsson still.
It's why this deal is crazy.
For every Jonas Brodin or Erik Cernak who just dominate from an early age, there are 10 Mike Webers. We don't know who Samuelsson is yet. Period.
For every Jonas Brodin or Erik Cernak who just dominate from an early age, there are 10 Mike Webers. We don't know who Samuelsson is yet. Period.
Earlier in the thread, I asked if Slavin was a good comparison in terms of stats. While I don't think it's impossible, I think Pesce is much more likely. In fact, I'd be surprised if he weren't on that level. Hovering between 25 and just under 30 points in his prime. If paired with Dahlin, he'll help him achieve lofty totals but will be doing a lot of the unheralded work that doesn't result in nearly as many points.I would probably look at guys like Slavin and Pesce. Samuelsson mostly played with Bryson in the third pair and only then began to play with Dahlin, naturally he will have more points in the first pair with Rasmus than in the third. I think he could very well be a 25-30 point player.
Did Mike Weber ever play against the level of competition that we saw with Samuelsson? I'm honestly not recalling how Weber was used but thought it was mainly in a sheltered third-pairing role.Because young d-man haven't looked good for a 3/4 of a season and then never looked as good again? Mike Weber was great his rookie year. So did Jake McCabe. I am hopeful for Samuelsson, he DID look good last year.
You don't give 7 year deals off of 3/4 of a season. He could regress mightily this season. Or maybe once players have the book on him he'll struggle. There are so many unknowns about Samuelsson still.
It's why this deal is crazy.
For every Jonas Brodin or Erik Cernak who just dominate from an early age, there are 10 Mike Webers. We don't know who Samuelsson is yet. Period.
Samuelsson was captain of U18 and U20 and WMU also I think. He had the NHL pedigree. He is 6'4 225. The entire organization is 100% convinced that he will be a better player this coming season and they are planning on him and Dahlin to be a pairing for a long time.
As previously mentioned by someone the analytics team surely had input on this contract (and Tage contract as well). We can be sure that across the board everyone is happy in the Sabres org with this deal.
I think if he played out this season and it went as expected we would be looking at 5x5 instead of 7x4.whatevs.
He got a fair deal considering everything. Just like Tage. Could the team have done a bit better with each? Sure. 750k better on each contract? Maybe. Or maybe not.
Lets not ruin the good feels on opening night. Lets do that next week. If he still hasn't scored his first NHL goal and its January I will smash a 40 oz Cobra malt.
We saw some of that starting to translate as he played more games. Obviously small sample sizes but the shift was pretty clear.Small sample size alert, but 28 points in 45 AHL games is nothing to sneeze at. Projected over a full season, that's about a 50-point pace without PP time. Can't wait to see if he can translate some of that up here.