- Jan 9, 2009
- 15,976
- 10,500
Trade based on the assumption that Tkachuk will have agreed to a long term contract extension acceptable to the Canucks. Assume said extension will be in the $9-10m AAV range for 7 or 8 years.
Yes... Perfectly understandable. You're doing so well with the ones you have.Thanks but no thanks from Vancouver. Were great on wingers already.
Yes let's trade one of our top centres for a winger when we already have Boeser, Garland, Miller and Hoglander as our top 6 guys. That will solve all our problems brilliant. Thanks for taking Canucks needs in consideration before proposing this. By the way whose our two top centres after this Horvat and Dickinson good god. Try again this doesn't work.Yes... Perfectly understandable. You're doing so well with the ones you have.
good neither does cgy.Like tkachuk and his combo of offense and physical play, but imo Vancouver doesn’t consider this.
Right now, is it equivalent? EP has a problem. Not sure if it can be fixed.A winger never gets an equivalent center
Wonder what Calgary does this off-season.
Tkachuk’s QO is 9M so he’s getting that at the minimum.
Gaudreau is a having a hell of a season. 22 points in 19 games. If Tkachuk is getting 9, I don’t see Gaudreau signing for less.
If Tkachuk is getting 9, what is Mangiapane going to ask for? He has 15 goals in 19 games and the same amount of points as Tkachuk. If he continues at this pace, he’ll get at least 6.
That is one problem that I wouldn't want. Three great players and they will get paid but that's allocating a lot of cap to wingers. You gotta think only one of Gaudreau or Tkachuk will be on team next season.Wonder what Calgary does this off-season.
Tkachuk’s QO is 9M so he’s getting that at the minimum.
Gaudreau is a having a hell of a season. 22 points in 19 games. If Tkachuk is getting 9, I don’t see Gaudreau signing for less.
If Tkachuk is getting 9, what is Mangiapane going to ask for? He has 15 goals in 19 games and the same amount of points as Tkachuk. If he continues at this pace, he’ll get at least 6.
I'd love to have Tkachuk in Montreal. I wish we drafted his brother.I think the Flames do need to do something at LW. You're right. I see Mangiapane landing somewhere between 6.5 and 7.5 per. Seems high, but he's doing what he is doing from the 2nd line and 2nd PP unit. He's also a very high end defensive winger.
Tkachuk is the player I'd move. I really do like a lot of what he brings. He's elite from the top of the circles in. He's elite at getting pucks out of our end. He's elite at drawing penalties. He's a horrific skater though. He doesn't drive play. He needs a driver like Backlund, Gaudreau, Mangiapane or Lindholm to play with to be effective. I wouldn't move him just to move him, but if I found a full value offer I'd move him.
Gaudreau is our offensive engine. He is very underrated in terms of the backcheck and stripping pucks. He is very poor getting pucks out when they come up his wall, but he drives the offense and we have no one else who really does that except for Mangiapane at a lesser level. I do think the number will be lower than 9M though. I think 7.8 to 8.5 per will be the number.
I'd need a RHS wing in the deal. Ideally Toffoli. That and the pick for Tkachuk and a 2nd is a deal I'd do in the offseason.I'd love to have Tkachuk in Montreal. I wish we drafted his brother.
If the Habs pick ends up at 5th/6th overall, I'd move it in a package for Matthew. There's not many guys like him in the league. It'd also be fun to have him on a line with Gally. Chirps all night.
I'd love to have Tkachuk in Montreal. I wish we drafted his brother.
If the Habs pick ends up at 5th/6th overall, I'd move it in a package for Matthew. There's not many guys like him in the league. It'd also be fun to have him on a line with Gally. Chirps all night.
Yes... Perfectly understandable. You're doing so well with the ones you have.
And what do you expect when you say... No thanks. We're great on wingers already? No you're not. The Canucks are a dumpster fire with no compete level and the team needs a serious shake up.Makes a proposal in post #1. Receives a brief but polite response explaining why trade doesn’t work for one team in post #2. Takes a sarcastic shot in post #3.
Great work.
Tkachuk is a great player, but top 6 wingers are not the thing the Canucks are missing the most.
Trade based on the assumption that Tkachuk will have agreed to a long term contract extension acceptable to the Canucks. Assume said extension will be in the $9-10m AAV range for 7 or 8 years.
And what do you expect when you say... no thanks. We are doing just fine with the wingers we have? The Canucks are a dumpster fire with no compete level and the team needs a serious shake up.
EP is playing like shit and if you think someone is going to trade an elite center for him... dream on. Tkachuk is a franchise player who absolutely hates to lose and if anyone can make a difference to the losing culture on the Canucks its him
And what do you expect when you say... no thanks. We are doing just fine with the wingers we have? The Canucks are a dumpster fire with no compete level and the team needs a serious shake up.
EP is playing like shit and if you think someone is going to trade an elite center for him... dream on. Tkachuk is a franchise player who absolutely hates to lose and if anyone can make a difference to the losing culture on the Canucks its him
you're so correct, a player that has elite offensive production in their first 3 seasons but suffered an injury that kept him out of over half of last year and missed training camp might never bounce back. McKinnon, PLD, Nylander, young talented players never have down seasons. Finally if Petey might not be able to be fixed, why make a proposal for him? Quite clearly you want the elite C, but when your proposal is turned down suddenly EP has a problem. Stay classy RubiRight now, is it equivalent? EP has a problem. Not sure if it can be fixed.
Chucky is Chucky. Intangibles. Currently has 8 goals and 7 assists which would make him the Canucks leading goal scorer.
Why would Calgary do this? One of these guys is playing well on a team this is also playing well. He’s a talented and agitating power forward that’s in a role that’s pretty hard to find/fill in today’s NHL.Trade based on the assumption that Tkachuk will have agreed to a long term contract extension acceptable to the Canucks. Assume said extension will be in the $9-10m AAV range for 7 or 8 years.
you mean the way MT has single handedly pulled the Flames into Stanley cup contention. His 5 points in 15 playoff games over 3 seasons and 3 first round exits screams winning culture.And what do you expect when you say... no thanks. We are doing just fine with the wingers we have? The Canucks are a dumpster fire with no compete level and the team needs a serious shake up.
EP is playing like shit and if you think someone is going to trade an elite center for him... dream on. Tkachuk is a franchise player who absolutely hates to lose and if anyone can make a difference to the losing culture on the Canucks its him
Flames will likely gile for arbitration to avoid the QO then sign him long term between 8 and 9.5Wonder what Calgary does this off-season.
Tkachuk’s QO is 9M so he’s getting that at the minimum.
Gaudreau is a having a hell of a season. 22 points in 19 games. If Tkachuk is getting 9, I don’t see Gaudreau signing for less.
If Tkachuk is getting 9, what is Mangiapane going to ask for? He has 15 goals in 19 games and the same amount of points as Tkachuk. If he continues at this pace, he’ll get at least 6.