Loach
Registered User
- Jun 9, 2021
- 3,486
- 2,461
Joseph is 9 years younger, a much better skater, much better PKer (Perron doesn't even PK) and OUTSCORED Perron at even strength last season (33 vs 30 pts) in 4 less games. Perron is more skilled overall and has good hockey sense so he's going to be better on the PP but did we need Kubalik as a PP weapon last season? Same thing again
Chychrun was a complicated player. He brought offense from the blueline that we could miss this year is Chabot and Sanderson don't step up in his place, but Chychrun was a flat out liability defensively, quite possibly one of the worst top 4 dmen in the league when it comes to defending. It will be very easy to replace his contributions to that part of the game.You think Chychrun is a replacement level player???? I've seen stupid takes on here before but this is a contender for dumbest take of the year.
Thats the issue with asking someone to engage in hypotheticals. Getting into the weeds of it based on what ifs isn't really going to get anywhere. Amadio's cap is a bit too rich for my liking, he should've come in at 500k less, in that case you can have Kleven up, or maybe been able to resign Branstrom at 900k. Or have Ostapchuk up instead of Amadio all together, and you'd be able to keep Kelly as well. But again, that's getting into the nitty gritty of it which was not the point.OK let's do the math: Senators have $3.6 million in cap right now. Buyout Hamonic save $733K keep Joseph add back $2.95 million . Sign Tarasenko instead of Perron add another $750 K.
So after those moves Senators available cap is less than $700 thousand and they only have 5 defensemen on the roster and 12 forwards.
No because he’s not that great. He’s a decent. Wildly inconsistent.Joseph had some nice rushed short handed, that’s where the blowing by defenders thing comes from likely. He didn’t do much of that 5 on 5.
I don't think signing Brannstrom to 900k was ever an option, it was qualify him or part ways. There's not really a lot of incentive for Brannstrom to stick around at a discount rate.Thats the issue with asking someone to engage in hypotheticals. Getting into the weeds of it based on what ifs isn't really going to get anywhere. Amadio's cap is a bit too rich for my liking, he should've come in at 500k less, in that case you can have Kleven up, or maybe been able to resign Branstrom at 900k. Or have Ostapchuk up instead of Amadio all together, and you'd be able to keep Kelly as well. But again, that's getting into the nitty gritty of it which was not the point.
Yep I would imagine he'd like a change of scenery at that point. I'd prefer to have Kleven up instead regardless.I don't think signing Brannstrom to 900k was ever an option, it was qualify him or part ways. There's not really a lot of incentive for Brannstrom to stick around at a discount rate.
WHAT???? You said you would buyout Hamonic keep Joseph and sign Tarasenko instead of Perron. I used the actual buyout and contract amounts to prove to you it didn't make sense as you only had 5 Dman on the roster and no cap room to add anyone. And you call that hypothetical?Thats the issue with asking someone to engage in hypotheticals.
Yes, you said what would you do, I would give Amadio 500k less, is that hypothetical realistic? Maybe, or maybe not, I dont know, its a hypothetical but its what I would've preferred if possible. That alone with the Hamonic buyout would make the cap work for Tank and Joseph to be here and bring up Kleven as 6th D. If not, don't sign Amadio, and have Ostapchuk up and keep Kelly instead. What about that is not comprehensible to you? You're asking me to do guess work based on what might be possible, not on what actually has happened.WHAT???? You said you would buyout Hamonic keep Joseph and sign Tarasenko instead of Perron. I used the actual buyout and contract amounts to prove to you it didn't make sense as you only had 5 Dman on the roster and no cap room to add anyone. And you call that hypothetical?
You sure as hell can't criticize a GM for not making moves that are impossible to make.
I don't think anyone needs to tell you how absurd this statement is. You mean to say you just wouldn't sign him. They didn't just gift him an extra 500k annually for fun.Yes, you said what would you do, I would give Amadio 500k less, is that hypothetical realistic? Maybe, or maybe not, I dont know, its a hypothetical but its what I would've preferred if possible. That alone with the Hamonic buyout would make the cap work for Tank and Joseph to be here and bring up Kleven as 6th D. If not, don't sign Amadio at all, and have Ostapchuk up and keep Kelly instead. What about that is not comprehensible to you? You're asking me to do guess work based on what might be possible, and what actually has happened.
OK, then dont sign him. Glad we agree, he aint worth the 2.6m.I don't think anyone needs to tell you how absurd this statement is. You mean to say you just wouldn't sign him. They didn't just gift him an extra 500k annually for fun.
Should maybe start a Could you do better than Staios thread.. We had a couple for his predecessor.Yes, you said what would you do, I would give Amadio 500k less, is that hypothetical realistic? Maybe, or maybe not, I dont know, its a hypothetical but its what I would've preferred if possible. That alone with the Hamonic buyout would make the cap work for Tank and Joseph to be here and bring up Kleven as 6th D. If not, don't sign Amadio, and have Ostapchuk up and keep Kelly instead. What about that is not comprehensible to you? You're asking me to do guess work based on what might be possible, not on what actually has happened.
Scored at a rate of almost 2 to 1 to Joseph the last 3 years while pulling in 300k less. Seems like if he's not worth it, Joseph DEFINITELY isn't worth his.OK, then dont sign him. Glad we agree, he aint worth the 2.6m.
Career year of 27pt LOL, and a year older. Just cause Joseph might be overpaid by a bit, doesn't justify we turn around and do a bigger overpayment to Amadio. Two wrongs don't make a right all the sudden. But keep on making excuses for his mistakes. Jesus do you love to argue.Scored at a rate of almost 2 to 1 to Joseph the last 3 years while pulling in 300k less. Seems like if he's not worth it, Joseph DEFINITELY isn't worth his.
Amadio is a much better player than JosephCareer year of 27pt LOL, and a year older. Just cause Joseph might be overpaid by a bit, doesn't justify we turn around and do a bigger overpayment to Amadio. Two wrongs don't make a right all the sudden. But keep on making excuses for his mistakes.
Dont agree, and dont care if you like him better.Amadio is a much better player than Joseph
And I don't care that you know nothing about hockey lolDont agree, and dont care if you like him better.
Oct 29th. St. Louis is in Ottawa. Who's going to cheer on Joseph?
@DJB willOct 29th. St. Louis is in Ottawa. Who's going to cheer on Joseph?
All started because of a Gregor turnoverDid you guys see that goal? Perron was too slow to keep up with the play, Amadio lost his man and Jensen got outmuscled. That's when you need a Vezina save. Ullmark is such a sieve. Staois ruined this team.
Terrible defensive structure from coach Green.All started because of a Gregor turnover