Hockey Duckie
Registered User
His 43 points last year came on a historic bad Ducks team so maybe if they hadn't been so bad he'd have gotten 60 points on a very good team ?
Matthew Beniers had 57 points last year on a very good Seattle. Now Beniers isn't having the same success as last year and he's playing a whole minute more per game than McTavish.
McTavish has leapfrogged him in Faceoff win% at 57.7% this year.
I believe it's just a normal progression for McTavish. We were drafting him for his potential into the future. Plus, Mac wore himself out because he participated at the summer WJC-20, which took away his summer to rest, recover, and train. I think that had more to do with his production than being on a bad team as his play dropped off around game 50. Another factor is we started Mac at 2LW, but then worked his way from 4C to 1C, settling at 2C at the end of the season.
We are still not a playoff team this year. And if it were not for the Mac line being hot, we'd be in deeper shit. This past summer, Mac did have a normal summer to rest, recover, and train. That added strength is what's helping Mac out at the FO dot as he can overpower others if speed reactions are equal. Mac is producing with a bad team, but at a higher rate a year after his rookie season. It's what great prospects do. Question is if he can continue that pace.
Mac still isn't a finished product physically. A couple more years of weight training, skate training, and skill training, then Mac is going to be a tremendous force.
As for Beniers, I'm happy for Beniers. He stepped in on day 1 to be their 1C and help Seattle get into the playoffs.
Dunno why we keep on looking at the past and comparing to other players, especially on a board that didn't believe in Mac before we drafted him.