Player Discussion Marner

[ORRFForever]

Marner was not healthy at all, he was dealing with an high ankle sprain injury... He was playing but his ankle was certainly not healthy, its kind of injury needing time to get good feeling...

Marner needs a change of scenery.

 

[Arzak]

Like last night when Nylander saved a shorthanded goal backchecking, and later Marner was out of position on the Devils' second goal?

Perhaps you should check on the meaning of "cognitive dissonance", because "I do not think it means what you think it means.”

Well said.

Nylander is better at preventing goals on PK/60 for years now. Not that it prevents team Marner from hyping the worst player at preventing goals on PK - Mitch Marner and sh*tting on Nylanders defensive abilities.

Nothing Nylander can do will change the narrative team Marner spins. Alternatively it doesn't matter how many times you point out how bad Mitch is at preventing goals on PK (he cheats for offense on PK hence why he gets the odd goal now and then and why he is one of the worst at preventing goals on PK - league wise (goals allowed on PK/60).


You know he got no clue when he uses it incorrectly twice in a row. Just using new catchphrase !

 

[francis246]

Well said.

Nylander is better at preventing goals on PK/60 for years now. Not that it prevents team Marner from hyping the worst player at preventing goals on PK - Mitch Marner and sh*tting on Nylanders defensive abilities.

Nothing Nylander can do will change the narrative team Marner spins. Alternatively it doesn't matter how many times you point out how bad Mitch is at preventing goals on PK (he cheats for offense on PK hence why he gets the odd goal now and then and why he is one of the worst at preventing goals on PK - league wise (goals allowed on PK/60).


You know he got no clue when he uses it incorrectly twice in a row. Just using new catchphrase !

What does what he said have to do with the PK? He said Nylander helped protect against a short handed chance. Which means the leafs were on the PP. not PK.

Marner was not healthy at all, he was dealing with an high ankle sprain injury... He was playing but his ankle was certainly not healthy, its kind of injury needing time to get good feeling...

Brad Treliving did make mention of this in his spitting Chicklets appearance. Was kind of surprised cause it didn’t look like it was affecting him all that much. But maybe it was what do we know.

 

[ACC1224]

What does what he said have to do with the PK? He said Nylander helped protect against a short handed chance. Which means the leafs were on the PP. not PK.



Brad Treliving did make mention of this in his spitting Chicklets appearance. Was kind of surprised cause it didn’t look like it was affecting him all that much. But maybe it was what do we know.

Pretty obvious to spot live he was hurting a bit, obviously not enough to keep him out and he never used it as an excuse.

Not his best game last night but that PK late in the 3rd was pretty good.

 

[666]

Like last night when Nylander saved a shorthanded goal backchecking, and later Marner was out of position on the Devils' second goal?

Perhaps you should check on the meaning of "cognitive dissonance", because "I do not think it means what you think it means.”

Of course, again, a sample size of one game. You people are so predictable. This is exactly the type of nonsense you guys have resorted to. You're rejecting long term indisputable facts and trick yourselves into justifying a fake reality whenever Marner makes a mistake. This is exactly an example of your cognitive dissonance. How can you not see it? Are we going to discuss every poor play Marner makes? Ok, then I hope you're going to discuss every brilliant play he makes as well? You guys are still talking about flipping the puck over the boards in the Habs series. Do you not see what you are doing? Do you finally get it?

 

[Arzak]

Of course, again, a sample size of one game. You people are so predictable. This is exactly the type of nonsense you guys have resorted to. You're rejecting long term indisputable facts and trick yourselves into justifying a fake reality whenever Marner makes a mistake. This is exactly an example of your cognitive dissonance. How can you not see it? Are we going to discuss every poor play Marner makes? Ok, then I hope you're going to discuss every brilliant play he makes as well? You guys are still talking about flipping the puck over the boards in the Habs series. Do you not see what you are doing? Do you finally get it?

Talk about predictable, it's not a small sample size buddy. Nylander is objectively better on PK by the only matric that should matter on PK. Goals allowed /60. FOR SEASONS.

You are using small sample size like you are trying to say it was an outlier. It wasn't . Nylander better on PK when you need someone to defend. Mitch one of the worst we have. For years. He scores on PK

One game . You are funny. It's always one game, but you can group them into seasons and Nylander is still better on PK. Surprise surprise.

 

[666]

Talk about predictable, it's not a small sample size buddy. Nylander is objectively better on PK by the only matric that should matter on PK. Goals allowed /60. FOR SEASONS.

You are using small sample size like you are trying to say it was an outlier. It wasn't . Nylander better on PK when you need someone to defend. Mitch one of the worst we have. For years. He scores on PK

One game . You are funny. It's always one game, but you can group them into seasons and Nylander is still better on PK. Surprise surprise.

You might want to pay attention. I've never said anything about the PK and post the you're responding to was someone responding to me in a thread that never mentioned PK. Pay attention and don't waste people's time.

 

[Arzak]

What does what he said have to do with the PK? He said Nylander helped protect against a short handed chance. Which means the leafs were on the PP. not PK.



Brad Treliving did make mention of this in his spitting Chicklets appearance. Was kind of surprised cause it didn’t look like it was affecting him all that much. But maybe it was what do we know.

Wow, I love when you guys play stupid. Ok if you insist. I was pointing out that Nylander is so much better at preventing goals on PK (shorthanded situation) as opposed to Mitch ( one of the worst we have), it should shock no one he made a great play on short-handed chance.

Why would you be shocked when he is so much better at defending? As can be clearly see by goals allowed on PK.


Hope it's clear now. Mitch is not good at defending, despite the narrative you keep on spinning. He can't do it on PK, meh 5v5 in the regular season, and could not stop my grandma in playoffs.

You might want to pay attention. I've never said anything about the PK and post you're responding to was someone responding to me in a thread that never mentioned PK. Pay attention and don't waste peoples time.

if you don't think shorthanded situation is similar to preventing goals on PK. That's on you buddy

 

[666]

if you don't think shorthanded situation is similar to preventing goals on PK. That's on you buddy

No one, in the thread you jumped into the middle of was talking about anything other than long term 5v5 where the stats are indisputable. You guys do that alot. Jump into a discussion that you don't know what's going on.

 

[thusk]

Then why didn't they mention anything about it the season ending presser? And why did they bring him back several games earlier prior to the playoffs?

You're certainly never had any ankle sprainl in your life. You can be able to put weigh on your feet, skating and whatever ( so be in position to play).. but you don't get back all your flexibility, its something you need time...

 

[Stringer Bell]

I think at this point I really believe Nylander and Matthews mesh more at 5vs5.