Connor McConnor
Registered User
- Nov 22, 2017
- 5,655
- 6,784
Kind of like his hairFriedman has fell off so bad in the last 5 or 6 years.
Kind of like his hairFriedman has fell off so bad in the last 5 or 6 years.
Nah, Babcock is an insecure guy playing a 'ard mannn... Berube legimately scares me.meh.. everyone said Babcock was going to be the tough person to hold them accountable.. same **** different coach. Until the players start giving a damn, the coach doesn't matter.
These narratives always make me laugh and shake my head. What could Berube ask of Matthews to do he isn't doing?
I know Babcock personally. He doesn’t take s***. You’re making opinions based off what you read online. That characteristic led to him losing the room in Toronto. If Berube is as tough as people say he is, it’s going to be interesting how Toronto’s core react to it because they didn’t exactly react well when they had someone whose known as a hard ass in the past.Nah, Babcock is an insecure guy playing a 'ard mannn... Berube legimately scares me.
I'm not usually a hater but wtf is with that dude's head? Like LMAO
Marner has not only been poor in the play offs, he's had decent years, and the issue isnt the big 4 the issue is the supporting cast is too weak, the defense is in shambles, and the goaltending is horrid,Usually coaching changes do that but only temporally. With how poor Marner and the big 4 have been in the playoffs I don't see how Berube can change that. They are soft as hell and not built for playoff hockey. A coaching change won't fix that. And 8 years is a huge enough sample size.
Marner has not only been poor in the play offs, he's had decent years, and the issue isnt the big 4 the issue is the supporting cast is too weak, the defense is in shambles, and the goaltending is horrid,
That's not a big 4 issueYes, they are the issue because they took too much money and that's why the supporting cast is too weak. They are the core issue with this team. They should be able to carry this team more, but they can not and have not.
Agree wholeheartedly. This is like parenting.I know Babcock personally. He doesn’t take s***. You’re making opinions based off what you read online. That characteristic led to him losing the room in Toronto. If Berube is as tough as people say he is, it’s going to be interesting how Toronto’s core react to it because they didn’t exactly react well when they had someone whose known as a hard ass in the past.
That's not a big 4 issue
If the leafs had stronger drafting they'd be able to plug holes with young players
Aslo you can't put the blame on those 4 players, hockey is a team sport, Leafs right now are scape goating Marner as the issue when he's not the issue, the issue is poor defense and goaltending. I do not understand the idea that trading Marner will fix the leafs, it will just create another hole.
Agree completely. I am not a fan of Marner, but he's not the only problem here. And I agree that neither is JUST the core 4. The fact that Shanahan is still in place just signals to me that the same corporate culture is going to just continue, perhaps with a difference nuance.That's not a big 4 issue
If the leafs had stronger drafting they'd be able to plug holes with young players
Aslo you can't put the blame on those 4 players, hockey is a team sport, Leafs right now are scape goating Marner as the issue when he's not the issue, the issue is poor defense and goaltending. I do not understand the idea that trading Marner will fix the leafs, it will just create another hole.
For one he's primarily a play maker and he hasn't done horrible in the playoffs, until this year he has actually been decent.He is the issue. How is it on the goaltending when they can't score? He is supposed to create offence in playoffs, and he has not done anything special. For the money he is making, he should be doing more in the playoffs. He is overrated and overpaid. This team is built around offence, and people say when this high scoring offence scores 2 goals a game in the playoffs that it's a goaltending issue?
I don't think trading Marner will create a hole, he's more of a luxury. I'd say the same for Nylander and Tavares. Matthews is their only 1C so I don't think he's a luxury, anymore.That's not a big 4 issue
If the leafs had stronger drafting they'd be able to plug holes with young players
Aslo you can't put the blame on those 4 players, hockey is a team sport, Leafs right now are scape goating Marner as the issue when he's not the issue, the issue is poor defense and goaltending. I do not understand the idea that trading Marner will fix the leafs, it will just create another hole.
The problem is as an offensive system they go for the wrong type of D-man, I feel like there stuck in the early 2000's going for slow moving hard hitting d-man, if you're going to play an offensive system you need d-man who can move the puck and help with transition. I feel like Leafs management suffers from now going for the right type of players to play in the system they have.Agree completely. I am not a fan of Marner, but he's not the only problem here. And I agree that neither is JUST the core 4. The fact that Shanahan is still in place just signals to me that the same corporate culture is going to just continue, perhaps with a difference nuance.
You hit the nail on the head. The Leafs, just like my Oilers, in my view, suffer from deficiencies historically (in the last decade or more) in both goaltending and defense. Sure there are occasional flashes of brilliance, but the scouting needs to be improved with some more homegrown draft picks that get developed.
That said I do think Marner IS PART of the problem - he is paid an exorbitant amount to produce offense, and when it counts in the playoffs, he disappears. The blame cannot be put solely on him, as you aptly described, but he is not immune from being a contributing factor.
Or you Resign Marner, the primary playmaker for your 69 goal scoring Center, wait a year get Tavares off the books, focus on drafting and developing talent or make smart trades to improve your team.I don't think trading Marner will create a hole, he's more of a luxury. I'd say the same for Nylander and Tavares. Matthews is their only 1C so I don't think he's a luxury, anymore.
Trading your strength to address your weakness isn't outlandish thinking, especially when the team results haven't been working out for 8 straight years.
This is a very good point and an astute observation I had not previously considered. Very true that not all D men and the same and that defensive systems can vary widely.The problem is as an offensive system they go for the wrong type of D-man, I feel like there stuck in the early 2000's going for slow moving hard hitting d-man, if you're going to play an offensive system you need d-man who can move the puck and help with transition. I feel like Leafs management suffers from now going for the right type of players to play in the system they have.
Coaching has never been the issue with the leafs, the issue has been Management bring in players that do not fit the system they play, you guys literally have one guy who can move the puck, that's an issue, they need to start playing the young guys and see what they have, a guy like Robertson is probably going to be a good young cheap second liner for a while that's a start that's cheap depth.If the Leafs struggle out of the gate then things might go sideways in their room. Berube is a hard nosed guy and coaches like that. Core Players need to buy in and that takes winning.
Holland gets a raw deal in Edmonton, I feel like he's done a better job than Dubas did in toronto, he wasn't perfect but he did some good deals. Canadian teams seem to suffer in the management department for some reason, I'm wondering if its because of the media and culture? Causing them to speed up rebuilds like the sens did to try and compete and keep there fan base happy.This is a very good point and an astute observation I had not previously considered. Very true that not all D men and the same and that defensive systems can vary widely.
Definitely these playoffs watching D men like Makar, Bouchard, Forsling, Harley, Ekholm and even Hughes...they can play multifaceted roles and are not stuck in one mode of play.
It's an option, just not one that has worked out before.Or you Resign Marner, the primary playmaker for your 69 goal scoring Center, wait a year get Tavares off the books, focus on drafting and developing talent or make smart trades to improve your team.
Look at Vancouver, Alvin rebuilt that team in a year to be a contender, I can see the leafs capable of doing that, you just need Treveling to be innovative and creative.
Good points.Coaching has never been the issue with the leafs, the issue has been Management bring in players that do not fit the system they play, you guys literally have one guy who can move the puck, that's an issue, they need to start playing the young guys and see what they have, a guy like Robertson is probably going to be a good young cheap second liner for a while that's a start that's cheap depth.
Holland gets a raw deal in Edmonton, I feel like he's done a better job than Dubas did in toronto, he wasn't perfect but he did some good deals. Canadian teams seem to suffer in the management department for some reason, I'm wondering if its because of the media and culture? Causing them to speed up rebuilds like the sens did to try and compete and keep there fan base happy.
I think the Jets are the best Canadian team at drafting and devleopment, I wish the Sens had just stayed the course instead of making the Chychrun and Debrincat trades I feel like that set them back,Good points.
With the Leafs, even though I am not a fan in the least, playing guys like Robertson, Knies, and Woll on a regular basis in high pressure situations will both help these good potential guys develop but also provide a solid second option with the core. Or why not mix some of the young guys with the Core and experiment.
The Leafs do have some albatross contracts they need to likely wait out, but even then, who's to say they won't just rinse and spin the same cycle again, as long as the same management is in place. I've always said the Leafs' issue is a culture issue, which bleeds into all facets of the operation. Wanting quick results, or changing some optics is not going to yield lasting change of trajectory.
Regarding Canadian teams and placating fan bases - I don't blame the teams at all to a degree. We've been cup-starved for decades and certainly I think most if not all the teams get that. How to get there, however, is up for debate, and unfortunately, quick and dirty is not really the best way to go. No one likes to take their time and do things slow, methodically and properly nowadays. Corporations are not immune to this mentality.