Despite co-leading the team in points with Kopitar on December 11th (32 games into the season) and having 5 points in his last 4 games (including assists on 2 Carter goals), Mike Richards is considered to be having an off-year overall by many on this board.
Here are some facts:
Coming into this season, he had scored 76 points in 122 regular season games for the Kings (51 point pace for 82 games) averaging 20 goals per season and was a minus-5 overall in +/-.
This season Richards has 35 points in 52 games (55 point pace for 82) is on an 11 goal pace (substantial drop) but is an even +/-. Now some of you may have higher expectations of a guy who's making almost $6M/yr and that may be fair criticism although I submit that playing defensive-minded hockey in L.A. vs. Being the captain of a run & gun team in Philly, where he signed that contract, are two different things. Also, if anyone's paying attention to what Wayne Simmonds has done lately, it may be skewing your emotions a bit as well.
But here's something to keep in mind. Since coming to the Kings on Feb 23, 2012 and up until the start of the '13-'14 season, Jeff Carter has been involved with Mike Richards in 51.4% of Richards' points (either by assisting a Carter goal, co-assisting on someone else's goal or scoring a goal from a Carter assist) including playoffs. This season, Carter's been involved in just 31.4% of Richard's points (11 of 35) yet clearly, Richards is on his usual point pace even if his goal total is lagging.
Oh, I've heard the arguments...But they're awful defensively together. First of all if Richards was so bad defensively why is he one of the team's lead PKers on the 5th best PK in hockey. Carter isn't a poor defensive player at all (The Kings really don't have poor defensive players...well, I'm not a Muzzin fan but that's another thread for another time). Secondly, even if they are a sieve defensively, what does that mean? They'll give up .25 G/G more than they might if they weren't together? Great, they'd go from the #1 defensive team in hockey to the #4 team. Meanwhile, they'd probably go from being the #24 offensive team in the league to the #16 team in the process which is all they'd need.
You want more from Richards (and who wouldn't? Even Richards would, especially on this offensive "juggernaut".) I think the answer is clear, I just don't know that it's clear to the farmer running this team.