backhandsauce
Registered User
- Oct 19, 2009
- 4,763
- 1,563
Someone literally made a meme of the KFC guy and replaced KFC with “STU” on you boardsLol this thread again.
Edmonton doesn't need goaltending they need defense.
Fickle fans who love to pile on players when they are struggling?Someone literally made a meme of the KFC guy and replaced KFC with “STU” on you boards
What’s actually the problem?
Makes senseFickle fans who love to pile on players when they are struggling?
Systems play mostly. Sloppyness, carelessness, blown coverage. Stu isn't a world beater, but I don't really think he is the problem. In a perfect world, we would have someone better, but that isn't Blackwood. The only way I consider Blackwood, is if we wanted to move on from Pickard, but he's been pretty good for the most part once again, so despite being in favour of this idea a week ago, I think I've changed my mind- Blackwood isn't worth the extra cap. hit. That 2nd pair RHD spot is still the biggest hole to fix.Makes sense
I wasn’t trying to be a smart ass, I was just trying figure out the root causes for the slow start
Don't disagree with you there tbhWe need defense who don't have xbox controller disconnected moments when Jack Eichel is skating towards the Oilers net.
Honest question: what is it with Mackenzie Blackwood that make people think he could be a solid NHL starter? Is it that he was a second round pick? His one good year in the OHL? His one good year in the NHL, 5 years ago?
Because his name keeps coming up, and not in any of the conversations that they probably should pop up, like how he's overpaid despite making just over $2M per year.
He was arguably better than the other Sharks platoon goalie, waiver wire pickup Kaapo Kähkönen. Being better than him isn't a sign that you could be a solid starter.He was great last season
He was arguably better than the other Sharks platoon goalie, waiver wire pickup Kaapo Kähkönen. Being better than him isn't a sign that you could be a solid starter.
He sure as hell wasn't great.
By what measure? His save percentage was right around Kahkonen's, his GSAx had him in the Tristan Jarry / Alex Lyon range of goaltenders. And he didn't even do it with a starter's workload.He was definitely great, hasn't been the same so far this season but, yeah, he was great last season
Lol this thread again.
Edmonton doesn't need goaltending they need defense.
Honest question: what is it with Mackenzie Blackwood that make people think he could be a solid NHL starter? Is it that he was a second round pick? His one good year in the OHL? His one good year in the NHL, 5 years ago?
Because his name keeps coming up, and not in any of the conversations that they probably should pop up, like how he's overpaid despite making just over $2M per year.
They absolutely need goaltending.
They need a damn save when it counts.
Watch the two goals Florida scored in game 7.....
Stu is a good back up, he's not #1 material.
Yeah, but that's not average starter level. That's average NHL goalie. So a bad starter or good backup. He was 32nd in the league per Moneypuck, and 26th per Evolving Hockey.It's a combination of factors. He's got size, decent fundamentals, was a bright spot on SJ during their worst season since the 90s and was one on the lottery Devils before that. His "fancy stats" also put him somewhere around average, which is what the Oilers can't even get out of Skinner.
Is he probably fool's good? Sure, and my preference is really Soderblom since he's younger and his numbers better in every way this year. But Edmonton needs to try something (anything) to find their own Monty or Hill. The status quo won't do.
He plays well enough in short sample sizes that you think there is a starter in there. The physical tools are all there. Size, strength, quickness, mobility, agility. He makes tremendous saves at times that few can. But he cannot sustain it. He loses focus, loses position, and loses his confidence. On the right night you see a bona fide starring goalie. Then you see him over four games and he's given up 17 goals getting pulled in one. He's 2-2 in that span but one win was a good game, one was a 5-4 win where he only faced 25 shots and two are bad with goals going in from bad angles or through standard screens without changing direction. If he could ever get his psyche stabilized he would be great.Honest question: what is it with Mackenzie Blackwood that make people think he could be a solid NHL starter? Is it that he was a second round pick? His one good year in the OHL? His one good year in the NHL, 5 years ago?
Because his name keeps coming up, and not in any of the conversations that they probably should pop up, like how he's overpaid despite making just over $2M per year.
Thank you. This does actually explain people's infatuation with his potential.He plays well enough in short sample sizes that you think there is a starter in there. The physical tools are all there. Size, strength, quickness, mobility, agility. He makes tremendous saves at times that few can. But he cannot sustain it. He loses focus, loses position, and loses his confidence. On the right night you see a bona fide starring goalie. Then you see him over four games and he's given up 17 goals getting pulled in one. He's 2-2 in that span but one win was a good game, one was a 5-4 win where he only faced 25 shots and two are bad with goals going in from bad angles or through standard screens without changing direction. If he could ever get his psyche stabilized he would be great.