Notsince67
Papi and the Lamplighters
- Apr 27, 2018
- 16,376
- 11,467
I'm good with it. Checks the boxes from a need vs cap perspective.
Dubas and his crew didn't even want a 6th round pick from Edmonton because it's worthless.Kadri for kerflower and Barrie
Hyman letting him walk fir free
Dubas never building the D
BingoShouldn’t the question be, why isn’t morgan propping those players up if he’s supposed to be a #1 dman?
LolDubas homers have less than zero credibility.
Last time Boosh came here, he doubled his salary value. I bet he is happy to do so again.
4th would have been ideal but I'm fine with the 3rd since they could risk striking out completely or be left paying for a player that doesn't really fit their roster; not a lot of Plan B's out there.It's fine.
A 3rd is more than I'd prefer to pay for a guy of his limited abilities. But he brings physicality + PKing.
The cost of retention was lower than anticipated which is nice.
Ideally they bring in one more D man of higher impact.
They let him go because he was getting 2.75 m and now we are getting him for 0.675 m. Big difference.
Again blame Dubas for leaving an empty cupboard. One round in 5 years leaving a team worse than which he inherited, pathetic all those dubasites supporting a loser because he looked like them.The only move he needed to make was bringing in a partner for Rielly, and he brought in someone who proved he couldn't handle that. Treliving is so useless
I actually don't care to blame Dubas for all the problems in the worldAgain blame Dubas for leaving an empty cupboard. One round in 5 years leaving a team worse than which he inherited, pathetic all those dubasites supporting a loser because he looked like them.
Exactly the type of player to acquire, cheap and fills a need, now go get Peeke and the right side is fixed without paying a king’s ransom………We need size, we need a guy to box out the front of the net, we need a guy who owns the boards, we need a right hand. He can't pass, he's limited no doubt but there's no question he adds something to the group. He beat out Holl and Lil to start the playoffs for us, it wasn't without merit. Is he Tanev? Nope. But we're also screwed asset wise, so I'll take this as a good depth D add.
The answer is on a good day he is a #2 and on a bad day is a really good #3, most leaf fans wouldn't know what a #1 d-man is if it bit him in the ass. We've been told for so long Morgan is a #1 that we have lowered our standards. Makar is a #1, Hughes is a #1, Hedman is a #1, Heiskanen is a #1, Morgan is not a #1. Morgan can for short stretches play like a #1 against teams having off nights but he is not nor has he ever been a true #1.Shouldn’t the question be, why isn’t morgan propping those players up if he’s supposed to be a #1 dman?