Eisen
Registered User
We are spoiled by the Malkins, Ovies and Crosbys of the world. Taylor Hall is taking normal development steps, ne need to send him down.
We are spoiled by the Malkins, Ovies and Crosbys of the world. Taylor Hall is taking normal development steps, ne need to send him down.
No chance. Change the title, it's misleading.
What does Taylor have to accomplish in the OHL? Back to back memorial cup MVP's isn't enough? What does it do for his developement? Hall has actually been pretty good in all the games so far this season, he's snake bit.
i dont think they will send him back but he isint playing good has a point what taylors doing wrong is he skating with his head down just waiting for the puck he did these things last year in windsor thats why they should send him back and a 3rd mem cup it would be great for us
What now? Finland aggressive/physical playing style
To be honest Hall and some other rookies show why there is a huge problem with the agreement between the NHL and the CHL. Hall might not be ready for the Show, but the guy has dominated juniors for 3 years, he should have the right to play in the AHL to develop. A year in Junior does him no good, and keeping him in the NHL because the only option is too send him to the OHL, could damage him. An amazing talent I think he will eventually breakthrough. While everyone said Malkins, Ovechkins and Crosbys spoiled us, which is true, I honestly believed he would make a similar transition to Patrick Kane, who came in right away and was a 70 point player. I understand Tavares and Stamkos couldn't do that, but I thought with his offensive skills and speed, on top of playing a less demanding position would allow him to excel.
We are spoiled by the Malkins, Ovies and Crosbys of the world. Taylor Hall is taking normal development steps, ne need to send him down.
Keep him in NHL over 9 games, then loan him to a European club. This has been done with European draft picks, but is it possible (rules) to do that with North Americans?
Well the Oilers will save ~2.5M in performance bonuses if Hall stays in the NHL and doesnt light it up.
There is 0 reason for him to go back to juniors. He has nothing to work on. I am not sure how the rules work but can the Oilers still let him play at the WJHC ?
I posted this in another thread, but will post it again here:
Post after post I see nothing but praise for 2008 1st overall pick Steven Stamkos, and it's deserved, he's a great player. I also see tonnes posts with people quite negative about 2010 1st overall pick Taylor Hall. These people, IMO, expect WAY too much out of an 18 year old rookie. How short are your memories? Here's how Stamkos' career started:
First 7 games: 0 points, -3
First 17 games: 2g, 1a, -8
First 40 games: 4g, 9a, -11
I can almost guarantee that many of the people currently downtalking Hall are the same ones who were calling Stamkos a bust 40 games into his career. Rookies take time to develop, I don't see how anyone can watch Hall and not see the massive potential, he's got incredible raw tools, like all 18 year old rookies he's just not a finished product.
Keep him in NHL over 9 games, then loan him to a European club. This has been done with European draft picks, but is it possible (rules) to do that with North Americans?
There isn't much for him to learn at junior at this point. If he is still slumping around Xmas they might send him to the world JRs