It was a sink or swim event for the OHL kids. Fortunately, pretty much all were very impressive within their respective roles.Really strong Gold medal game last night, where is he expected to go in the draft? Think he might rise a bit after the U-18’s? I’m really interested in seeing just how much of an effect that tournament is going to have on scouts in this pandemic year.
Yes.Think he might rise a bit after the U-18’s?
It was a sink or swim event for the OHL kids. Fortunately, pretty much all were very impressive within their respective roles.
I still dont think this tounrey is gonna move the needle a tonne for OHL guys. I think youll see a lot of them end up going a bit later than they should come draft time. Do you take a kid you scouted at 17 that looked good and kinda confirmed it with a short tounrey. Or take the guy in the Q or W thats similar but more games to evaluate? I think the higher picks like Clarke will be helped, I dont think a guy like Othmann moves up much from this.
He is a guy I hope the wings can get at their Washington pick depending where that is
I'd give that a 0% chance. I still think 90% Dallas is gonna pick him and they currently sit 16th I believe. In any way, Othmann likely won't last until 20.
Also, Othmann was at his best in the final and semifinal. He also stepped up his game in the Swiss League playoffs after a rather disappointing 2nd half of the regular season. He proved that he can step up his game at the right time. That's something teams are looking for. Also, Othmann has a very high floor. No way he's gonna bust.
Youre right he might not be there depending when that pick is. But the caps pick isnt necessarily going to be super low.
But unless youre in on their draft meetings, its pretty ridiculous to state theres a 90% chance that a single team will draft him when were not talking a top 5 or so pick. I have a feeling youre only saying that because theres been some Brendan Morrow comparisons. Hes ranked 25 by Mackenzies latest rankings so saying hes got a 90% chance of being gone by 16 seems ridiculous to me
Still calling Dallas. Hope I wasn't wrong all along![]()
Pick traded...so probably not![]()
Welcome to New York. Seems like NYR fans are selling his upside short. Looked like he had progressed quite a bit at the U20's. Excellent release and scoring touch.
welcome the newest untouchable in an Eichel trade
I don’t mind the player, but the pick made no sense, which means it makes exact sense for Chris Drury decision.
I don’t mind the player, but the pick made no sense, which means it makes exact sense for Chris Drury decision.
Let's zoom out for a second and understand what the strategy is at this point.
1 - No center you're picking at 16 is jumping into the NHL this year or next. Look at Peyton Krebs - very, very talented, but it's taken him near 3 years to break into the VGK lineup in any way - and that's in spite of their general lack of center depth. You can't draft for immediate or short term need beyond the 5th overall or so.
2 - At this juncture, the Rangers have the hard stuff right. They have multiple high end puckmovers on D - including one in Fox who can be accurately described as elite. They have the high end talent sorted with Laf, Kakko, Panarin, Kravtsov. They need the roleplayers now - and mid-firsts are the place to get them.
3 - Othmann is a skillset we don't actually have on the wings. He's probably 6' 195 or so in the NHL, pesty, good shooter. He's a prototypical mid-six wing that's probably minimum 3 years off the big team right now. I target him as the guy who replaces Kreider in 2024 or so, and if he's 100% of what he can be and/or really embraces the Tkachuk gene he says he has, he'll earn his spot higher up the lineup pretty fast. Guys who can skate, shoot, hate, and agitate - they never make it to FA and they cost your hide in trades.
I like the pick a lot. He's probably a roleplayer on a first-wave cup contender and a key player on a second wave cup contender in the second half of the decade.
I get your point, but it’s too early to assess the Drury regime at this point. Given the Rangers current and near future roster construction, it is totally rational to prioritize NA talent in a draft like this. A large portion of the team’s best current players are Euro or play a Euro style game (Zibanejad, Panarin, Kravtsov, Kakko, Shesterkin - I put Strome in this category too).I understand the philosophy, but I think it's the wrong one. I think you take the best players available, and I think that you lean towards the premium positions when drafting. Othmann wasn't some huge reach, so I won't give you a subjective list of names I would've preferred, as if it should matter. But it's obvious what the Rangers were going for. The guy that broke the Buch trade tweeted the Rangers wanted to draft Boucher. He doesn't get to our pick, so we draft one of the next grittiest players. If Boucher and Othmann both didn't get to our pick, are we drafting L'Heureux? Didn't we just draft Cuylle in the second round for grit last year in round 2?
The Rangers have only picked four guys from Europe the last two years, and 0 Russians. The Scouting Director was fired. The European Scouting, who is Russian, was Fired. Does it not seem like the Rangers are going in a very clear direction with the draft and the whole team that prioritizes grit, size, and more North American players? Drury is missing nearly a whole front office, so who is advising him right now? The direction we are seeing this team go seems like exactly the type of moves Slats and Dolan would demand. I'm not anti Othmann or grit or North American players, but I think the way Drury is running the team narrows avenues to success. The best way to build a successful team is to have the best players, and to not try to mold the team as narrowly as Drury is trying to do so. I criticize teams like the Isles or Habs for building their team the wrong way. I need to be consistent and criticize the Rangers when they start doing so.