Ok, I'll play along.
In 2014-2015, Talbot in 31 games put up 2.21 GAA and .926% sv%. Lundqvist in 46 games put up 2.25GAA and .922sv%.
In 2015-2016, Raanta in 31 games 2.24GAA and .919sv%. Lundqvist in 65 games had a 2.48GAA, and .920sv%
Does the argument really fall apart, considering the amount of times they've made playoffs with Talbot, Raanta and Georgiev = 4 times out of the 11 times Lundqvist has reached the playoffs? And in 2 of those seasons it's not like Lundqvist didn't do the majority of the work where he was completely outplayed. He was great. Is he in the category of the top 5, probably not. But if anybody looks at our team through-out most of those seasons, especially early on, and thinks Lundqvist didn't play a majority role in making the playoffs, I really don't know what you were watching