jaster
I am become woke, destroyer of ignorance.
- Jun 8, 2007
- 13,961
- 9,787
Oh jeez, my bad, totally forgot to consult those super helpful and informative Jfresh cards before I formed an opinion on Lucas Raymond. My bad. Thanks, Jfresh!
According to jfresh we should waive Mo rather than extend him.
Well, it's a waste to chat about. We'll just see what happens. I'd be shocked if he got an 8 year deal. We both can talk about what "we'd" do but it's whatever. I can just say the difference is people that want long-term now are attempting to get a discount/deal without TRULY knowing if he'll be anything better than DeBrincat( good example ). I'll take the bridge, and if he develops into something more like Kucherov/Tkachuk type scorer/point producer during that 3-5 year run, great, I'll gladly pay him more. He'll be one of the best players in the whole league.Kucherov signed his contract in 2018 for 9.5M cap hit at a league cap of 79.5M, 11.9% of the cap. This was right after he had his first 100 point season. The same contract today would be 10.4M.
If Kucherov was signing a contract after he put up 120+ pts multiple times, it woudl be closer to 13 or 14M. The point is that signing Raymond to 8x8 gives us a situation where we have a possible 85-90 point player in his prime making 8M on a ~100M cap, which is a much smaller proportion than Kucherov makes today. Nobody is saying we should be paying him that kind of money. If Ray was Kuch, we'd be talking 10 or 11x8, not 8x8.
I would try to go something like 7.8 x 8 , DeBrincat money. And I'm certain Raymond outplays that number.
You formed an opinion?Oh jeez, my bad, totally forgot to consult those super helpful and informative Jfresh cards before I formed an opinion on Lucas Raymond. My bad. Thanks, Jfresh!
Well, it's a waste to chat about. We'll just see what happens. I'd be shocked if he got an 8 year deal. We both can talk about what "we'd" do but it's whatever. I can just say the difference is people that want long-term now are attempting to get a discount/deal without TRULY knowing if he'll be anything better than DeBrincat( good example ). I'll take the bridge, and if he develops into something more like Kucherov/Tkachuk type scorer/point producer during that 3-5 year run, great, I'll gladly pay him more. He'll be one of the best players in the whole league.
You formed an opinion?
Yeah defenceman ratings won't work with this system.
Forward ratings will work very well.
Forward ratings don't work. No ratings will ever work. If everything was that simple, hockey would be played in an Excel spreadsheet and there would be very predictable results for every player on every team in every game, every season. You would never have breakout players, you would never have hot streaks and cold streaks, there would never be a miraculous Florida run last year in the playoffs. Contract negotiations wouldn't be negotiations, but retail purchases off the rack.
You can never summarize everything that makes a player who they are with a handful of stats rolled up into half-assed display.
90 goals that would be impressivehe’s gonna hit 90 next year
he’s gonna hit 90 next year
He also hasn’t consistently been on PP1Possible. He did start slow this season. If I remember correctly, he was kind of the forgotten son for a bit while the excitement of Debrincat and all of the other new hires were settling in.
And he was still generating chances, just not getting many points. PP or otherwise.He also hasn’t consistently been on PP1
It’s amazing people don’t understand this. It’s not the number, it’s the percentage of the cap.Would not be a Skinner look alike. Skinners deal accounted for 11.3% of the cap. Raymond would need a 9.9m contract next year to account for that. An 8m contract would be 9.1% of the cap. Quite the difference.
Plenty of reasons to think he won’t turn into MacKinnon.No reason to think he can't turn into an elite star. Check out say Mackinnons first 3 years in the league, or Marner. 70 points as a 22 year old, he will.hit his prime in another 2-5 years.
He was 21 all season until 2 weeks ago, makes it more impressive. No reason he cant be a 90 point playerNo reason to think he can't turn into an elite star. Check out say Mackinnons first 3 years in the league, or Marner. 70 points as a 22 year old, he will.hit his prime in another 2-5 years.
BumpHe's been pretty disappointing this year imo. Not seeing the development in his game I'd hoped we'd see atp. For a smaller guy he lacks that extra gear and the offensive skills, IQ, and vision just have not improved. No creativity, not playing with any confidence, still far too easy to push off the puck.