jaster
I am become woke, destroyer of ignorance.
- Jun 8, 2007
- 13,961
- 9,787
No, that's Patrick Kane. I have it on good authority if you gave Berggren Kane's linemates and ice time, he'd absolutely produce an equivalent amount.Berggren replacement.
We have 3 goalies. We can drop one to Grand rapids and save up to 1.1m in cap. So really we have up to 9.848m availableSo if we have $8.75M left in cap space, is that really enough to sign Seider for 8 years?
Or does that mean we're doing a bridge deal with him?
Or we'll have to find some savings somewhere?
Puh-leeze. In 20 years we'll be talking about Babcock, Holland, Cleary, K.F. Quincy, and Abby.the best part is we'll never actually know for sure so we might be talking about in 20 years how this time it's future considerations time for real and we're gonna see a 2045 first round pick swap
We have 3 goalies.
No. 8.075M vs 8.7MDoes Razor make more than Larkins now? No more capfriendly.com....
And Franzen vs. Hossa.Puh-leeze. In 20 years we'll be talking about Babcock, Holland, Cleary, K.F. Quincy, and Abby.
Robyn Regehr was once a future consideration deal but I know nowadays it's usually a GM dinner.Literally every time someone wants something to happen. I bet this is where those shifty little future considerations comes in. Lmao. I think those considerations are nothing. It's like buying drapes for $1
So if we have $8.75M left in cap space, is that really enough to sign Seider for 8 years?
Or does that mean we're doing a bridge deal with him?
Or we'll have to find some savings somewhere?
Does Razor make more than Larkins now? No more capfriendly.com....
considering what both larkin n raymond signed, arguably a shade under market-value, b shocked if they cant get seider done for 8.7x8 yrsSo if we have $8.75M left in cap space, is that really enough to sign Seider for 8 years?
Or does that mean we're doing a bridge deal with him?
Or we'll have to find some savings somewhere?
Puh-leeze. In 20 years we'll be talking about Babcock, Holland, Cleary, K.F. Quincy, and Abby.
I don't think D-Boss's next contract will be a killer, he has already suggested that when he signed the last one. I do think SY would want to avoid having both Ray and Mo due the same year down the road, so yes, a potentially shorter term deal for Mo could be in the works (having some cap space this season would be a good thing too).I think Seider could be the exception to take a shorter deal. Like 6 years. Then all those long-term contracts would not end at same time. Larkin has 7 years left, Raymond 8 years.
Think these big deals ending at same summer with any combo of the Top3 guys could become a problem.
Nope, I am a little dyslexic and I know it, I missed adding a "won't" before the be "a killer" Larkin has already basically said that his next one would hopefully be a value one for the team, assuming he he is still playing past the current contract. (I even read it it three times before posting)You're expecting Larkin to increase value post-30y.o.?
I'm expecting to be right back into heavily debating his value in the last 2-3 years of his current deal.