ChesterNimitz
governed by the principle of calculated risk
- Jul 4, 2002
- 5,846
- 12,698
Here's my short assessment of Mailloux's play last night against the Erie Otters:That's interesting about his conditioning issues and play on back to back games. With all the time he's missed it kind of makes sense, but if he wants it bad enough I think he'll be a starting dman at the nhl level. It's clear he has the tools but does he have the work ethic to get him to the nhl. Time will tell.
Overall: Mailloux played a steady game and played in all leveraged situations (Power Play; Penalty Kill, 4 on 4 and when the Otters had pulled their goalie when the score was 3-1. Once the Knights (George) scored an empty net goal, Hunter sat Mailloux. Interestingly, after the Otters scored in the last minute to make the score 4-2, Hunter quickly put Mailloux back on the ice. While Mailloux played with a number of the other Knights' defencemen, he was largely paired with George and when the two of them were on the ice they largely controlled the flow of play.
Offensively: By Mailloux's standards, it was a relatively quite, but controlled game. Mailloux was somewhat clumsy in his puck handling at the start of the game probably a result of the long holiday break. Nevertheless, Mailloux led the team in shots and was a threat most of the game. His passing and vision remained top notch and he made a number of intuitive passes in all three zones of the ice. Hunter continues to use Mailloux on the half boards during power plays (ala Ovechkin, Stamos, Caufield) and Mailloux must have taken at least a half dozen one-timers that were just blurs on the ice. Mailloux could have had three or four goals in the game as he: hit the cross bar on a shot from the slot that the goalie still hasn't seen; missed on a clear break-a-way from the blueline while playing 4 on 4 and missed numerous chances when his shot from the point/half board or the slot missed the net, was blocked or the goalie made a save. While his offensive presence was noticeable; I didn't think his offensive game was as dynamic as I have seen in the past. He made a couple of his end to end rushes each period, but largely played a safe, controlled game. Mailloux still has to learn how to get his shot through from the point and the half board. His shot is easily NHL level in power. But if he wants to have a major offensive impact at the next level he has to get that great shot through and on the net. As Xhakej has shown so far at the NHL level, get your shot on the net and good things happen. And Mailloux's shot is at least as good as Xhakej's.
Defensively: Mailloux played a largely non-descript defensive game. He made most of the correct reads, played a physical game that allowed him to smother opposing players on the boards, used his long reach to interdict passing lanes and was never cleanly beaten wide when defending the rush. His gap control still remains a work in progress as he still relies too much on his stick to stop and control opposing players. While this tactic may work at the OHL level, it will be far less effective in the NHL where the players he will be trying to defend against will, in most part, be bigger, faster and stronger. On a positive note, other than one errant pass in the third period, Mailloux committed no major defensive mistakes.
Other Notes: Isaiah George was the best player on the ice last night. He used his superior skating to: control the defensive zone; skate the puck out of harm's way and carry out several offensive rushes that led to high level scoring chances and one goal. This kid was a steal in the fourth round and soon will have many teams wondering how he slipped so low. How Team Canada didn't even invite him to the evaluation camp is incomprehensible to this observer.
Last edited: