Prospect Info: Logan Mailloux Part 3 The Only Hockey Talk Thread

Heffyhoof

So happy to be glad to be pleased to meet you.
Jan 17, 2016
1,792
2,967
There's no clear indication of any of them being a number 1. I don't think any have been pegged as number one D, or even number 2. Hopefully they turn out to be, but don't be surprised if the Habs have to sign or trade for a top pair guy in the next couple years. Even the Habs top three Centremen were acquired via trade.
For me, Ghule is a top pairing lock. Everything that you could enjoy about Romanov's game, Ghule was just better. He won't score 40-50 points, but he'll play 25+ minutes a game and we'll all be happier for it.
 

ChesterNimitz

governed by the principle of calculated risk
Jul 4, 2002
5,856
12,745
Here you go...


Not only has this kid matured significantly on a personal level, but his on-ice skills are also quite impressive.


This kid has all the talent to be that elusive number 1 defenceman that all teams seek. Great, gutsy pick that will benefit the team for the next decade.
 

SlafySZN

Registered User
May 21, 2022
7,564
16,398
People might not like this comparison but from the little i saw of him he makes me think of Petry.
 

Sterling Archer

Registered User
Sep 26, 2006
23,339
14,106
For me, Ghule is a top pairing lock. Everything that you could enjoy about Romanov's game, Ghule was just better. He won't score 40-50 points, but he'll play 25+ minutes a game and we'll all be happier for it.
He might get close to that after a few years in the league. He’s shown he’s comfortable in the offensive zone. It’s will he get the opportunity once in the nhl to go on more offence.

I see him as a Weber type player who can add some look ya and he has an absolute rocket if a shot that can add some PP points too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Heffyhoof

SlafySZN

Registered User
May 21, 2022
7,564
16,398
He's got better offensive tools than Petry. The offensive potential is much higher.
Possibly I was more talking about the kind of player, same frame, not that much physical, great skater, and offensive D with some holes defensively. Petry came to mind the first time i saw Mailloux play. Petry still a 45 points D, which would be already good for Mailloux to get to that.
 

ChesterNimitz

governed by the principle of calculated risk
Jul 4, 2002
5,856
12,745
People might not like this comparison but from the little i saw of him he makes me think of Petry.
As I noted before, he has the smooth , effortless skating style of Malakhov. After Slafkovsky, Mailloux is easily Montreal's most talented prospect. This could get very interesting if these two players reach their full potential.
 

BenchBrawl

Registered User
Jul 26, 2010
31,063
13,996
As I noted before, he has the smooth , effortless skating style of Malakhov. After Slafkovsky, Mailloux is easily Montreal's most talented prospect. This could get very interesting if these two players reach their full potential.

Stylistically, he reminds me of Denis Potvin, with the way he's sniping those wrist shots from the blueline.

Agree with you that Mailloux is the 2nd most talented prospect on the team.
 

26Mats

Registered User
Jun 23, 2018
33,409
25,786
As I noted before, he has the smooth , effortless skating style of Malakhov. After Slafkovsky, Mailloux is easily Montreal's most talented prospect. This could get very interesting if these two players reach their full potential.

I'm high on Mailloux. But, let me debate your definition of talented. You called him talented because of one elite skill: his skating. So I would at this point call Mailloux a talented skater. But, I wouldn't call a guy like Drouin, who has more than a few elite skill sets, talented at NHL hockey. Sure he's highly skilled. But his lack of hockey sense doesn't make him a talented hockey player. Just a talented skills competition guy, but a rather useless hockey player.

We'll have to wait and see about Mailloux's other skills, especially his ability to process the offensive and defensive sides of the game at NHL speed, before we know his NHL talent level.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BLONG7

ChesterNimitz

governed by the principle of calculated risk
Jul 4, 2002
5,856
12,745
I'm high on Mailloux. But, let me debate your definition of talented. You called him talented because of one elite skill: his skating. So I would at this point call Mailloux a talented skater. But, I wouldn't call a guy like Drouin, who has more than a few elite skill sets, talented at NHL hockey. Sure he's highly skilled. But his lack of hockey sense doesn't make him a talented hockey player. Just a talented skills competition guy, but a rather useless hockey player.

We'll have to wait and see about Mailloux's other skills, especially his ability to process the offensive and defensive sides of the game at NHL speed, before we know his NHL talent level.
Absolutely. Except in the rarest case, we have to wait to see if any player has the skills that translate to the NHL level. That is why I find it somewhat amusing how many are quick to anoint so many players as generational, exceptional, etc. Ahh ... the curse of the consensus.

For Mailloux, his skills are far more than just being a "talented skater". He has superior size and an NHL ready shot. How much better to have a prospect with these existing skills than one who you hope can develop same. There are no certainties in the development progression / trajectory of any player. But if I am betting person, I'm betting on the 6'3" guy who can skate like the wind and has a cannon of a shot. The margin for failure goes down significantly for those type of prospects.
 

Wats

Error 520
Mar 8, 2006
42,239
6,996
He's got better offensive tools than Petry. The offensive potential is much higher.

What do you base that on? Personally dont see him being a better prospect than Beaulieu at same age. Hope Logan gets better development on how to use tools.
 

Tyson

Registered User
Mar 1, 2007
50,215
72,931
Texas
Absolutely. Except in the rarest case, we have to wait to see if any player has the skills that translate to the NHL level. That is why I find it somewhat amusing how many are quick to anoint so many players as generational, exceptional, etc. Ahh ... the curse of the consensus.

For Mailloux, his skills are far more than just being a "talented skater". He has superior size and an NHL ready shot. How much better to have a prospect with these existing skills than one who you hope can develop same. There are no certainties in the development progression / trajectory of any player. But if I am betting person, I'm betting on the 6'3" guy who can skate like the wind and has a cannon of a shot. The margin for failure goes down significantly for those type of prospects.
Logan has some impressive skills sets but it will depend on his hockey intelligence as to whether he has an NHL career.
 

Kudo Shinichi

Registered User
Apr 20, 2012
21,242
28,224
What do you base that on? Personally dont see him being a better prospect than Beaulieu at same age. Hope Logan gets better development on how to use tools.

Watching him play, you can tell he's very talented offensively.
He's basically got the whole package: huge size, great skater, cannon of a shot, slick hands, vision, passing, etc.
Beaulieu's main problem was his hockey IQ. It's hard to tell how good or bad Mailloux's hockey IQ is since he hasn't played a lot of games.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cphabs and Tyson

Scriptor

Registered User
Jan 1, 2014
7,898
4,875
Who are you thinking of? Ghule is a beast, and will technically be our #1, but people don't consider the 25+ minute a night D-man as useful as the 20ish minute a night one that gets 10+ points more.
Maybe Hutson? And, yes, Guhle is a shutdown beast with offensive upside as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cphabs and Runner77

HABitual Fan

Registered User
May 22, 2007
1,766
1,041
If it is the intention to sign him, and without knowing how his season will go, it might be best for him to remain with London for his overage season instead of being forced to play against men in the AHL or ECHL given how much development time he has missed.
 

DramaticGloveSave

Voice of Reason
Apr 17, 2017
14,816
13,739
For a kid his age, he recently has not played a ton of games.............let's hope he can put in a full season so we can gauge better what type of Dman we have.
Ya he desperately needs a full healthy season. If he’s able to have one, and is able to dominate the way I think he can, he could end up an even better prospect than Guhle by the end of the year.

I said this once in the draft thread, but if he didn’t have the off ice issues and miss all that time, he’d probably had been viewed like a Jiricek was this past draft year, the tools are on that level.
 

ChesterNimitz

governed by the principle of calculated risk
Jul 4, 2002
5,856
12,745
Logan has some impressive skills sets but it will depend on his hockey intelligence as to whether he has an NHL career.
Mailloux's level of skill will almost guarantee him an NHL career, here or elsewhere. The question is: how great a career will it be? If he reaches his potential, Montreal will have secured that most elusive of all prizes: a No. 1 defenceman. The Idiot Savant's tenure was largely a train wreck. But the gutsy move to draft Mailloux when everyone else was blinded and deterred by the office ice issues, may well prove to be a decisive move in the re-construction of this fabled franchise. Who would have thought?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: cphabs and Tyson

lillypad33

Registered User
Sep 20, 2008
698
437
Kitchener
What do you base that on? Personally dont see him being a better prospect than Beaulieu at same age. Hope Logan gets better development on how to use tools.
Beaulieu was a great skater.
After that is where it ended though. I feel like his hockey sense is non-existent.

From watching a few games of Mailloux, I can tell you that his sense is higher than Nate's was.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad