Confirmed with Link: Lockout VI - Game On! Rejoice! Players to vote Saturday.

zeke

The Dube Abides
Mar 14, 2005
66,937
36,957
The Leafs are no where near challengers for playoffs.

Just like every other year.

What I am personally hoping for is a result that gets a) Nathan MacKinnon (the #1 centre we've been dreaming of) and b) Brian Burke/Dave Nonis fired.

The leafs finished closer to a playoff spot than picking #1 last year.
 

Leaf Rocket

Leaf Fan Till I Die
Dec 10, 2007
84,773
14,682
Toronto/Fredericton
The Leafs are no where neae challengers for playoffs.

Just like every other year.

What I am personally hoping for is a result that gets a) Nathan MacKinnon (the #1 centre we've been dreaming of) and b) Brian Burke/Dave Nonis fired.
I don't understand why people aren't aware of the fact that the leafs in the past two season have been in the upswing rather than a slide. We go from a 70% of the season in utter failure a year back and then going insane in a full fledged playoff rush for the last spot. The year after we go from a 30% of the season as a playoff team to 70% and collapse with our young core which left several people perplexed, yet people still fail to see our team is on the rise.

Yea I get the idea of getting a Mackinnon, a drouin, a lindholm, a monahan or a barkov is amazing. I've been following them since day one however it doesn't change the fact a team's main and ultimate goal is to win the stanley cup. Only way that it would be worth to get it would be if we found a freaking sidney crosby from this draft and frankly be told there are none as of yet. For the love of god even he didn't change the team in his first year or second year as well. It took him, Evengi Malkin, M.A. Andre Fleury and so many more pieces.

You are talking about burke and nonis being fired but honestly tell me do you think Sather should be fired from the rangers?
 

DaveT83*

Guest
Shortened Season will do wonder for the Leafs and their horrid lack of conditioning.
 

KuleminFan41

Registered User
Jan 5, 2009
5,845
614
The Leafs are no where near challengers for playoffs.

Just like every other year.

What I am personally hoping for is a result that gets a) Nathan MacKinnon (the #1 centre we've been dreaming of) and b) Brian Burke/Dave Nonis fired.
No where near challengers? Obviously you missed last season and don't give me this ******** about we still didn't make it. We played exceptionally well, a competent coach would have gotten us into the playoffs and not fail so hard. Anybody that knows sports knows this. We deserved playoff hockey last year but sadly we didn't make it

Anyways, its about time they get a deal. Lets get hockey up and running ffs lets do this!
 

Bomber0104

Registered User
Apr 8, 2007
15,237
7,307
Burlington
Picks from a team that had finished in the #7 range two years running would obviously be worth much more under these new rules than they were before, as they would be much more likely to turn into top 3 picks.

this is obvious, which is why you really have to stop.

No they aren't.

Because you seem to be confused that 1st/2nd/3rd last placed teams have the same probabilities as they do NOW (which are worse) to garnish the 1st overall pick than before.

Do you know what probability is? It's very simple mathematics actually.

Allow me to demonstrate:

(Former setup)

1st - 40% 2nd - 30% 3rd - 10% 4th - 5% 5th - 3% .. etc.

(Current setup)

1st - 20% 2nd - 15% 3rd - 12% 4th - 10% 5th - 9% ... etc.

What it means is that the Leafs would have been better off WAITING until NOW to trade multiple first rounders .
 

zeke

The Dube Abides
Mar 14, 2005
66,937
36,957
Who cares.

They finished closer to 30th place than 15th place in the standings.

No they didn't. in fact, they finished as close to 13th as 30th.

And you should care, if you're arguing that they were "nowhere near" the playoffs, and then start talking about the 1st overall pick.
 

Bomber0104

Registered User
Apr 8, 2007
15,237
7,307
Burlington
No they didn't.

And you should care, if you're arguing that they were "nowhere near" the playoffs, and then start talking about the 1st overall pick.

Yes they did.

5th last is closer to 1st last than 16th last.

Because that is just simple math.

11 teams were better than the Leafs.

Simple math.
 

Bomber0104

Registered User
Apr 8, 2007
15,237
7,307
Burlington
Zeke is attempting to tell me that a 40% chance at 1st overall should be valued less than a 20% chance at 1st overall.

Again...math is a very core subject in Canadian curriculum.
 

Budsfan

Registered User
Sep 17, 2006
19,218
1,365
Too much money involved, for them to have cancelled this year.

Here is some of the CBA agreed upon.

http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=412844

- A player contract term limit for free agents will be seven years and eight years for a team signing its own player.

- The draft lottery selection process will change with all 14 teams fully eligible for the first overall pick. The weighting system for each team may remain, but four-spot move restriction will be eliminated.
 

zeke

The Dube Abides
Mar 14, 2005
66,937
36,957
Zeke is attempting to tell me that a 40% chance at 1st overall should be valued less than a 20% chance at 1st overall.

Again...math is a very core subject in Canadian curriculum.

Making up numbers is not math, btw.
 

Bomber0104

Registered User
Apr 8, 2007
15,237
7,307
Burlington
Making up numbers is not math, btw.

Attempting to tell me the Leafs are better than opponents they aren't isn't factual.

What the numbers tell us is that the Leafs finished 5th last.

What numbers in the most general of senses tells us is that 5 is closer to 1 than it is to 16. I learned this many years ago.

So the Leafs should just strive to be 1, pick up a wicked prospect like Nathan MacKinnon, and try to be 16 NEXT YEAR

Keep in mind though that being in last place today does not guarantee the same outcome as it did before (key stipulation and change to the CBA)
 

King Mapes

Sub to My YouTube Blocks_4_days
Feb 9, 2008
28,862
1,163
Edmonton
Are we allowed 2 buyouts? If so, who goes? Komi? Who else? I can't think of many I'd buy out. Dion is overpaid but I doubt we buy out our captain.
 

Leafs For Life*

Guest
Yes they did.

5th last is closer to 1st last than 16th last.

Because that is just simple math.

11 teams were better than the Leafs.

Simple math.

16th last is 14th, but you are talking about simple math? :P Take out the 'last' part.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad