TootooTrain
Sandpaper
- Jun 12, 2010
- 35,517
- 477
Great. The Leafs are back for another disappointing year. Hooray?
That's the spirit!
Great. The Leafs are back for another disappointing year. Hooray?
Yes they did.
5th last is closer to 1st last than 16th last.
Because that is just simple math.
11 teams were better than the Leafs.
Simple math.
Maybe you should check the point totals instead of the standings alone...
Attempting to tell me the Leafs are better than opponents they aren't isn't factual.
What the numbers tell us is that the Leafs finished 5th last.
What numbers in the most general of senses tells us is that 5 is closer to 1 than it is to 16. I learned this many years ago.
So the Leafs should just strive to be 1, pick up a wicked prospect like Nathan MacKinnon, and try to be 16 NEXT YEAR
Keep in mind though that being in last place today does not guarantee the same outcome as it did before (key stipulation and change to the CBA)
It is more than a bit funny, but not altogether surprising, that you think there are 11 spots between 5th and 16th spot....especially in a post where you are trying to explain simple math.
of course, we know why you've decided to ignore point totals anyways.
Judging a team only by rank instead of quality if record is obviously not nearly as accurete, and would only be attempted by someone trying very hard to spin the facts.
Great. The Leafs are back for another disappointing year. Hooray?
What does it matter, in the end?
The Leafs finished 5th last.
That means 25 teams were better than they are.
That means all the playoff teams have a leg up on the Leafs in ability plus teams that were ahead of the Leafs that weren't even in the playoffs also have a leg up.
So what that means is that there are MANY teams ahead of the Leafs...but only a FEW teams behind them that stand in the way of Nathan Mackinnon and Seth Jones.
A couple extra points puts them in the playoffs or very close, couple extra losses maybe puts them 1 spot lower. So no that doesn't mean that there were 25 teams better than the Leafs, a couple of bounces going there way and they finish a lot higher.
But hey, I won't stop you from drowning yourself in your tears of ignorance.
I guess you could try to throw away all your talent so that we might finish last so that we might win the lottery so that we might draft mackinnon so that he might turn into a franchise player in 5yrs.
that seems like an awful lot to gamble on one prospect, though.
Shortened season = Leafs might make the playoffs
If we played like we did in the first half of last season we should be top of the conference!
Doesn't really seem like a whole lot to me. Lupul and Phaneuf are going to be over the hill in five years anyway. Kessel didn't really better or worsen the team so he can stay. Or someone like Gunnarsson can go since he is an important piece.
See when you are a 5th last, 9th last, and 2nd last place team...it should be abundantly obvious that there isn't much to "throw away" in the first place.
And if the rest of the league plays like they did in the second half of the season...we're screwed.
You'd be the first one crappung on mackinnon like you already do with rielly, anyways.
16th last is 14th, but you are talking about simple math? Take out the 'last' part.
And if the rest of the league plays like they did in the second half of the season...we're screwed.
Ah, you're a glass half empty guy. Gotchya.
I like the safe way you are a Leafs fan. Hate as much as you can, so when they don't live up to expectations, you can say "see, I'm brilliant!" and if they do end up surprising and doing well you can say "Leafs are winning that's awesome!"
Glad the game is back so we can have real threads of Leafs hating on here rather than stupid history of the Leafs, and crap like that!