Toggle sidebar

Confirmed with Link: Lockout Discussion Thread 5.0: The Lockout is over!!

  • We sincerely apologize for the extended downtime. Our hosting provider, XenForo Cloud, encountered a major issue with their backup system, which unfortunately resulted in the loss of some critical data from the past year.

    What This Means for You:

    • If you created an account after March 2024, it no longer exists. You will need to sign up again to access the forum.
    • If you registered before March 2024 but changed your email, username, or password in the past year, those changes were lost. You’ll need to update your account details manually once you're logged in.
    • Threads and posts created within the last year have been restored.
    • Our 2025 light and dark themes were lost, so we are rebuilding them. Light theme is currently available, but work in progress

    Our team is working with Xenforo Cloud to recover data using backups, sitemaps, and other available resources. We know this is frustrating, and we deeply regret the impact on our community. We are taking steps with Xenforo Cloud to ensure this never happens again. This is work in progress. Thank you for your patience and support as we work through this.

    In the meantime, feel free to join our Discord Server
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.
Darren Dreger: "a deal is close''.

Knew it from the beginning that it was going to be a last minute deal.. Way too much at stake.
 
coolasprICE said:
Darren Dreger: "a deal is close''.

Knew it from the beginning that it was going to be a last minute deal.. Way too much at stake.
Click to expand...

Dreger says IF they don't file the motion in the courts...

Darren Dreger ‏@DarrenDreger
If players don't file disclaimer + have to go to vote again, wouldn't this weaken position? Court would ask..why didn't you file 1st time?



Darren Dreger ‏@DarrenDreger
By not filing, seems to me, a clear sign a deal is close. Wait for PA exec board to decide today.
 
BLONG7 said:
20 teams in the playoffs? How could they make that work?
Click to expand...

NHL was pushing last year to change the divisions from six to four. That would mean five teams per division making the post-season.

While some argue that for the majority of the NHL's lifespan that 67% of the teams made the post-season, fact is it ruins the challenge and leads to far more games going to the three point OT/SO instead of completing in regulation.
 
They want 20 teams in the playoffs to increase revenues. I think it's a pretty bad idea. What could happen is the revenues already made by 16 teams will get diluted and they'll be back at square one with longer playoffs and less global interest. They should concentrate on making money while playing 82 games in the scrap markets. The playoffs are perfect the way they are played.
 
vokiel said:
They want 20 teams in the playoffs to increase revenues. I think it's a pretty bad idea. What could happen is the revenues already made by 16 teams will get diluted and they'll be back at square one with longer playoffs and less global interest. They should concentrate on making money while playing 82 games in the scrap markets. The playoffs are perfect the way they are played.
Click to expand...

They can get the same revenue increase by going from 82 game seasons to 85 game seasons or so.

I mean let's work out the maths.

Say best of five playoffs (average of four games) between teams 7,8,9,10 in each conference. 2 series per conference, 4 series overall, so 16 games added to the total calendar.

Actually, seems like you can get the same revenue increase by going from 82 game seasons to 83 game seasons; maybe 84 games if playoff games bring in twice the revenue of regular season games. This would also be more efficient in that it would only add two days to the hockey calendar.
 
DAChampion said:
They can get the same revenue increase by going from 82 game seasons to 85 game seasons or so.

I mean let's work out the maths.

Say best of five playoffs (average of four games) between teams 7,8,9,10 in each conference. 2 series per conference, 4 series overall, so 16 games added to the total calendar.

Actually, seems like you can get the same revenue increase by going from 82 game seasons to 83 game seasons; maybe 84 games if playoff games bring in twice the revenue of regular season games. This would also be more efficient in that it would only add two days to the hockey calendar.
Click to expand...

It isn't a question of math, it's a question of what catches the attention of Americans the most and the answer in their heads is the playoffs. Increasing the amount of games doesn't necessarily increase revenues or profits in this case. They want more people watching not just the same people shelling the same bucks, which would probably translate in an increase of broadcasting fees in the long run.

Edit: Think about it the teams that lose money will lose more with more games. Reducing the amount of games might actually help more. So if you make the playoffs longer that would be an almost necessity.
 
Last edited:
I think a short best of 3 series while giving the top 6 teams in each conference a week off would be exciting.

#7 vs 10 and #8 vs 9

I'm sure NBC would jump on board as well as CBC and TSN.

Last year we would have seen...

TB vs Wash
Ott vs Buf
and
SJ vs Dal
LA vs Calgary
 
Howard Bloom (of CTV or CTV sports) keeps insisting there will be an NHL season (he's pretty much guaranteeing one! says the NHL should start on Jan. 19).

(take this with a grain of salt but just felt like sharing!).
 
Mr. Hab said:
Howard Bloom (of CTV or CTV sports) keeps insisting there will be an NHL season (he's pretty much guaranteeing one! says the NHL should start on Jan. 19).

(take this with a grain of salt but just felt like sharing!).
Click to expand...

So what's his guarantee? His car? I'd take it :laugh:
 
I'm getting excited/optimistic here. All signs are pointing to a season starting up on the 19th, and that would be great. I still wouldn't buy any tickets this year, but if someone wants to take me to a game for free, I wouldn't turn it down.

Also, if they do come to an agreement soon, waiting until the 19th will be so difficult!
 
Le Tricolore said:
I'm getting excited/optimistic here. All signs are pointing to a season starting up on the 19th, and that would be great. I still wouldn't buy any tickets this year, but if someone wants to take me to a game for free, I wouldn't turn it down.

Also, if they do come to an agreement soon, waiting until the 19th will be so difficult!
Click to expand...

All signs except the ticking clock. That's 16 days until the season theoretically starts. That's very tight. To say the least.
 
i know this is going too far because theres no agreement yet but if theres a deal will there be preseason games or just 7 days of camps and then regular season?
 
the vinyl version said:
Seems like a no-brainer. Who would MB use the 2nd on?
Click to expand...

I'd vote for Kaberle. Considering Tinordi and Beaulieu in the A right now, a spot or two may open a spot for one of both of them to be the 5th and 6th defensmen.

Markov - Emelin
Pk - Gorges
Tinordi - Beaulieu
Diaz

I'd imagine signing or trading for a more veteran defensman in this scenario.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Status
This thread has been closed due to inactivity. You can create a new thread to discuss this topic.

Latest posts

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom