frightenedinmatenum2
Registered User
An interesting tidbit from the Friedman podcast.
He heard that Ottawa wasn't on Ullmark's no trade list because agents often don't include teams that are unlikely to trade for their player because it would be a waste of a spot. He speculated that Ullmark didn't include Ottawa on the list last year because they just added Korpisalo to a long-term deal, so it seemed unlikely that they would be in the market to add another starter.
This may have squeezed Boston and created a deadline because they might have feared that Ullmark would put Ottawa on his no trade list on July 1st.
The implication being, Ottawa basically said the only way this is getting done is if you take Korpisalo, and Boston had to do it or risk losing out on Ottawa as a trade partner.
The trade makes a lot more sense if that was a real concern. I'm guessing they didn't have a serious trade partner for Ullmark that wasn't on his list and they really needed the first round pick for another move.
I don't think there is a rational way to break down the value to where it makes any sense at all.
I suspect the situation was that they had zero real trade partners outside of Ottawa who weren't on his not trade list, so their only other option was to keep Ullmark for the year. I doubt it was a situation where it was like they could have sent Ullmark to x or y team for a 2nd instead. That's the only way this thing makes sense, if it was do it or keep him.
He heard that Ottawa wasn't on Ullmark's no trade list because agents often don't include teams that are unlikely to trade for their player because it would be a waste of a spot. He speculated that Ullmark didn't include Ottawa on the list last year because they just added Korpisalo to a long-term deal, so it seemed unlikely that they would be in the market to add another starter.
This may have squeezed Boston and created a deadline because they might have feared that Ullmark would put Ottawa on his no trade list on July 1st.
The implication being, Ottawa basically said the only way this is getting done is if you take Korpisalo, and Boston had to do it or risk losing out on Ottawa as a trade partner.
The trade makes a lot more sense if that was a real concern. I'm guessing they didn't have a serious trade partner for Ullmark that wasn't on his list and they really needed the first round pick for another move.
How do you value 25OA + Kastelic vs Getting rid of Korpisalo .. what's left after that a 3rd round pick?
I don't think there is a rational way to break down the value to where it makes any sense at all.
I suspect the situation was that they had zero real trade partners outside of Ottawa who weren't on his not trade list, so their only other option was to keep Ullmark for the year. I doubt it was a situation where it was like they could have sent Ullmark to x or y team for a 2nd instead. That's the only way this thing makes sense, if it was do it or keep him.