Leetch3
Registered User
- Jul 14, 2009
- 13,001
- 10,863
You missed the point. What he was saying was that the Rangers picked Andersson based on character and leadership...even if you like him as a player, which I clearly don't, that's kinda concerning. He's right about that. Andersson could be the most gifted player in hockey...after what he did it's worrying to know why they picked him. There are methods to find out about such issues in the interviews. Given the fact that this wasn't the first incident after the draft there were probably more incidents before the draft the Rangers should have known about. Things like that don't tend to come out of the blue.
no i didn't miss the point at all...the point was to imply that they took him for those things ignoring that he couldn't play. stating that you like his character doesn't mean you ignored everything else.