- Jan 18, 2012
- 35,306
- 53,965
#LiasWasTheProblem
Kravtsov scores.
Chytil scores.
Howden scores.
Kreider enters beastmode.
Kravtsov scores.
Chytil scores.
Howden scores.
Kreider enters beastmode.
That seems unnecessarily punitive, but to each their own. We accommodate lesser guys all the time. Even if the value sucks, just seems like it would be best for the organization to be able to move on completely, rather than have him be a story for as long as we choose to punish him (which sounds even worse when I type it).It would have to be at least a 2nd round pick for me to move him. I see zero reason to move him for a 3rd round pick (or value of) or less. I'd rather him rot if that's the case.
Yup lias saw that clearly I’m sure when kravtsov got back and left a week or so after?I agree with you but I’d include Kravtsov in the group with Kakko and Filip as someone who passed Lias up the prospect importance ladder.
I’m in the same boat. If his value is terrible and your not happy with what you can get for him, let him play in Sweden for a season or two and trade him when his value is higher. That’s what holland plans to do with pool party rightI'm in the let him rot camp. By let him rot, I mean let him play in Europe until his trade value goes up (it can't get any lower) or he calms down from tantrum. One side made his trade demand public and it wasn't the Rangers. **** him.
2 top 10 picks have looked to exit the Org in a very short period of time.
Is it really fair to just automatically label them entitled little whiners?
What is it that's going on behind the scenes, the elephant in the room?
Too be a fly on the wall..
I think the issue most of us have with Lias is not his desire to be moved – but how, and when, he’s gone about it. Not only does it give off a very bad impression regarding his attitude, it puts him the team in an awful position, and oh by the way, makes it damn near impossible to meet his request in the near term.
If this had all happened behind the scenes, he had continued to work hard, communicated his unhappiness through his agent – and then if nothing had been resolved by season’s end, had come out and asked for trade, I think people would have a lot less of a problem with the situation.
Well then, 1) the request came too early, 2) it would belie the idea that the rumors about the Rangers inquiring about moving him for Puljujärvi was one of the instigating factors that led to this move, and most importantly, 3) it doesn't (or shouldn't) change how he needed to go about your business this year. (Also, the fact that his agent may have said "my client is not happy" several weeks back, doesn't change the fact that Lias leaving the team just happened to come out after back-to-back pastings where he by all reports was horrendous on the ice. Not a good look.)Odds are that the trade request came weeks ago, and we are just getting to know when Lias and his agent went public with it.
The real Chad was the friends we made along the way.Maybe Mittelstadt was the chad all along.
That seems unnecessarily punitive, but to each their own. We accommodate lesser guys all the time. Even if the value sucks, just seems like it would be best for the organization to be able to move on completely, rather than have him be a story for as long as we choose to punish him (which sounds even worse when I type it).
It’s factually wrong to say Kravtsov tries to exit the organization
Well, your true intentions get lost in the message of "suspend him and let him rot", which absolutely would be punitive.It's not about being punitive.
It's about not being held hostage by some punk and getting the value we should get.
Well, your true intentions get lost in the message of "suspend him and let him rot", which absolutely would be punitive.
And getting the value we should get, that's something that may be best-accomplished by working with the player rather than "letting him rot".
Ok officially a bad pick. I was killing it early and I ended up being right. But at the same time Quinn did this kid no favors.
There are two issues that I have with the organization in this situation with Andersson. I want to address them separately.
First, I hold the Rangers responsible for rushing Andersson’s progression up the ranks that likely had an impact on his development. The partially mitigating factor is that the Rangers were in rebuild and really wished for immediate dividends. Not a good excuse but could explain Gorton’s mindset that influenced decision making.
With the help of the hindsight (though if I recall even then I preferred him to stay in the SHL after WJC) it should have been a full D+1 year in the SHL, full D+2 in the AHL and then this year getting a cup of tea with the Rangers.
...I don't disagree, except possibly with the last part because none of us know exactly what value he does hold. But anyway, what you're describing here is not really the same as the drive-by "suspend him and let him rot" hit on your first post. But whatever.The only way for him to build value is to play. If he's not going to play, how does he build value? By leaving the team, he's given up and essentially said that he's not interested in working with the team to build value.
So you're stuck in a conundrum. The only way for him to do this, then, is to go to Europe. We hold the cards and should absolutely not move him as of right now.
There certainly weren’t any friends made during this sagaThe real Chad was the friends we made along the way.
I don't buy the whole "setting a precedent" angle. Ugly situations exist between players and teams all the time. I really don't think trading him sets a precedent that other guys will emulate, given that we're only here because of the ****ty circumstances that preceded all of this.
The bad precedent would be not maximizing value because the kid pissed you off and you're resentful. I mean if he WANTS to go to Sweden and work on things and you think that's he way to build his value, cool. But letting him rot just to make a point when you could otherwise have an asset (even if it's not as good as you'd like), THAT'S the bad precedent.
Your understanding of the situations is lackingBut he did lol
Then got treated worse and ultimately came back.
Had things gone his way in Russia, would he have returned?
Why would a player and top 10 pick stall his development and leave the team where his next call is with the big team?
What's the reasoning behind all of this?
The answer is not that he's a whiner is all I'm saying.
There has to be more to this equation..
I am curious why Lias' AHL production this season was so low. Who is to blame for that?