Sounds alright, but graphic novels and movies are soooooo different in so many ways. And Batman's MO was established in Batman Begins and then completely torn apart in TDKR because Nolan wanted to shove in some libertarian commentary on the Occupy movement or something.
.
In the Dark Knight Returns (often regarded as one the best Batman graphic novels out there), Batman fights Sups in the day time.
So what's the alternative then? Was Nolan then to set up the plot so that the bomb would ultimately explode at night time? Or was Batman not to do anything because the final act took place during the day?
The aspect didn't bother me at all. My biggest gripe with TDKR was that it moved way too fast and the various elements of the script didn't have time to breathe. It's too bad Nolan wanted to move on from Batman, because the best approach would have probably been to split the final film into two movies. Part I would follow the story until batman is broken by bane. Part II would go more into depth on the recovery.
The reason Batman fought during the day is that Bane beat him up in the dark. It is in the dialogue of the movie "i was born in the darkness," the darkness benefits bane a lot more and this is a disadvantage to Batman.
There are legitimate problems with TDKR but this is not one of them.
Damn you got a legitimate point there.The reason Batman fought during the day is that Bane beat him up in the dark. It is in the dialogue of the movie "i was born in the darkness," the darkness benefits bane a lot more and this is a disadvantage to Batman.
There are legitimate problems with TDKR but this is not one of them.
Damn you got a legitimate point there.
I guess I just like bad movies.
I used to like bad movies then i watched this artie lange movie and now i'm just not sure
New season of True Detective started off on the right foot. I loved it. I can't possibly comprehend the overly detailed criticism of these idiots who expected the exact same thing as s1.
What is MEG?
That's why I'm here trying to spit some love back into the world.I am honestly dreading the hipster, failed-smartass backlash we are definitely gping to get with True Detective season two.
Everything (everything) good from Hollywood gets a backlash from people trying to prove how smart they are, to themselves and to others. The underlying, puerile, and dim assumption is that by crapping on that which is good they prove that their tastes are even higher. These same people never have the guts to crap on the Godfather or 2001.
Well Matthew Vaughn directed Kick-Ass, and it's supposed to be an action-comedy. I thought it was hammy but fun, and the established possibility of death/murder is sooooo much more effective than the implied one.
In the Avengers for instance, all this destruction implies death but no one dies on screen because it has to stay pg-13. No main character dies either because they're signed for seven more films. And if they do die, they'll come back to life. Same goes for civilians, thousands of space-slugs attack Manhattan and no one dies on screen, they just get some scrapes and dust in their face (which I guess would lead to mesothelioma over the long-term.) But generally, there is no risk, no reward, no stakes.
Kingsman wasn't like that, and I liked it.
Well said. I don't know the original material so I went into blind and enjoyed it.Vaughn makes fun movies with some cartoon ultra violence thrown him. It's very much watchable but there's nothing deep into anything he does. The Kingsman comic-book(called Secret Agent) was much more grounded, all around better. It was very much anti-Bond whereas, the Vaughn movie was very much Roger Moore with modern violence.
I like, dismiss, and loathe all kinds of movies.
Worst ive seen this year are Avengers 2 and Divergent 2.
Best are Ex Machina and Clouds of Sils Maria.
I will be watching Pixar's latest masterpiece this weekend.