Salary Cap: Lets put Salary structure expenditures to the test.

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

justashadowof

Registered User
Aug 15, 2020
4,025
4,230
Something fishy about the data on that site. Arizona is listed as having -$11 million in cap space. I took a look and they have Christian Fischer listed as having an $874,125 base salary, but a $10,000,000 cap hit. The base salary is correct, but his cap hit is $1,000,000 on cap friendly.

Christian Fischer
Christian Fischer - CapFriendly - NHL Salary Caps

View attachment 373890

There's nothing fishy. Fischer is making $874,125 in 2020-21 and $1,125,875 in 2021-22.
 

Golden_Jet

Registered User
Sep 21, 2005
25,256
12,874

JT AM da real deal

Registered User
Oct 4, 2018
12,325
7,714
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES
q2.svg
BONUSESCAP SPACE
21$81,500,000$81,434,366$0$0$65,634
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Delete Signed PlayerBuyoutAdd to Trade
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
toronto_maple_leafs.svg

Hyman, Zach
$2,250,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
toronto_maple_leafs.svg

Matthews, Auston
$11,634,000
C
UFA - 4
toronto_maple_leafs.svg

Marner, Mitchell
$10,893,000
RW
UFA - 5
toronto_maple_leafs.svg

Mikheyev, Ilya
$1,645,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
toronto_maple_leafs.svg

Tavares, John
$11,000,000
C
NMC
UFA - 5
toronto_maple_leafs.svg

Nylander, William
$6,962,366
RW, LW
UFA - 4
toronto_maple_leafs.svg

Vesey, Jimmy
$900,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
toronto_maple_leafs.svg

Kerfoot, Alexander
$3,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 3
toronto_maple_leafs.svg

Simmonds, Wayne
$1,500,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 1
toronto_maple_leafs.svg

Barabanov, Alexander
$925,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
toronto_maple_leafs.svg

Thornton, Joe
$700,000
C
NMC
UFA - 1
toronto_maple_leafs.svg

Spezza, Jason
$700,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
[TBODY] [/TBODY]

Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
toronto_maple_leafs.svg

Muzzin, Jake
$5,625,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 4
toronto_maple_leafs.svg

Brodie, TJ
$5,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 4
toronto_maple_leafs.svg

Andersen, Frederik
$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
toronto_maple_leafs.svg

Rielly, Morgan
$5,000,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
toronto_maple_leafs.svg

Holl, Justin
$2,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
toronto_maple_leafs.svg

Campbell, Jack
$1,650,000
G
UFA - 2
toronto_maple_leafs.svg

Lehtonen, Mikko
$925,000
LD
UFA - 1
toronto_maple_leafs.svg

Bogosian, Zach
$1,000,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 1
toronto_maple_leafs.svg

Dermott, Travis
$1,250,000
LD
RFA
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
 

Golden_Jet

Registered User
Sep 21, 2005
25,256
12,874
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES
q2.svg
BONUSESCAP SPACE
21$81,500,000$81,434,366$0$0$65,634
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Delete Signed PlayerBuyoutAdd to Trade
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
toronto_maple_leafs.svg

Hyman, Zach
$2,250,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
toronto_maple_leafs.svg

Matthews, Auston
$11,634,000
C
UFA - 4
toronto_maple_leafs.svg

Marner, Mitchell
$10,893,000
RW
UFA - 5
toronto_maple_leafs.svg

Mikheyev, Ilya
$1,645,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
toronto_maple_leafs.svg

Tavares, John
$11,000,000
C
NMC
UFA - 5
toronto_maple_leafs.svg

Nylander, William
$6,962,366
RW, LW
UFA - 4
toronto_maple_leafs.svg

Vesey, Jimmy
$900,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
toronto_maple_leafs.svg

Kerfoot, Alexander
$3,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 3
toronto_maple_leafs.svg

Simmonds, Wayne
$1,500,000
RW, LW
NTC
UFA - 1
toronto_maple_leafs.svg

Barabanov, Alexander
$925,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
toronto_maple_leafs.svg

Thornton, Joe
$700,000
C
NMC
UFA - 1
toronto_maple_leafs.svg

Spezza, Jason
$700,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
toronto_maple_leafs.svg

Muzzin, Jake
$5,625,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 4
toronto_maple_leafs.svg

Brodie, TJ
$5,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 4
toronto_maple_leafs.svg

Andersen, Frederik
$5,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
toronto_maple_leafs.svg

Rielly, Morgan
$5,000,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
toronto_maple_leafs.svg

Holl, Justin
$2,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
toronto_maple_leafs.svg

Campbell, Jack
$1,650,000
G
UFA - 2
toronto_maple_leafs.svg

Lehtonen, Mikko
$925,000
LD
UFA - 1
toronto_maple_leafs.svg

Bogosian, Zach
$1,000,000
RD
NTC
UFA - 1
toronto_maple_leafs.svg

Dermott, Travis
$1,250,000
LD
RFA
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
[TBODY] [/TBODY]

What about Phil Kessel.
 

egd27

exspecta usque ad proximum annum
Sponsor
Jul 8, 2011
17,101
13,009
GTA
I don't understand how the linked site shows the Leafs can have these four high salaries and compete. It doesn't provide enough detail to really show anything but the each teams current cap situation.
 

Wafflewhipper

Registered User
Jan 18, 2014
14,114
5,694
I don't understand how the linked site shows the Leafs can have these four high salaries and compete. It doesn't provide enough detail to really show anything but the each teams current cap situation.
It shows much more than that for me. The top 4 scored more than 50% of the goals at just a touch under 50% of the cap. The calling for trading Nylander made no sense if you compare him to Kapanen and Johnsson and Kerfoot because he scored one more goal than the 3 combined @ a cap saving of $3,000,00 plus by keeping him.

The site shows the distribution of cap dollars spent on forwards,defense and Goalies for comparison for all teams. There are many teams in the range the Leafs are for expenditures on offense.
The defense shows three very solid middle class salary earners now in Brodie added to Rielly and Muzzy. The redistribution of cap from offense to defense was done by finding some bargains in Simmonds,Spezza,Thornton,Vesey,boyd,Anderson,Barabanov etc.
We have 2 top line centers. We have 2 top line right wingers one is also a high quality scorer league wide and one is a high quality playmaker league wide. The sum of their parts scores over fifty percent of our goals. Is not physical, is highly skilled.

Our goaltending is very good quality for the money also when compared to the league. We come up high on offense spending,middle of the pack on Defense and Middle pack goaltending.
The depth players are a mixed bag of needs that were missing in terms of the style they play tipping the scale more towards physical and defensive with leadership qualities. The outgoing were not leaders,soft and tipped the scale to much to the offensive style to what we knew as top 9.

The team is now a more balanced top 6,bottom 6.

The team balance has changed to a construction that will play better in the trenches. The grit is there in the depth now more than ever in the past 4 years.
Thats on the the compete side. The charts show our spending is more balanced now with better quality players that will fill the specific roles that were needed.
I don’t know how 4 players providing Over 50% of the offense can be viewed as anything but money well spent.

I’ll say again,Nylander scored more goals than all three of the third line that received over $10,000,000. Kerfoot is still around but could be moved and replaced by a more physical cheaper defensive center quite easily if a team needs a decent skilled third line center. I’m not saying Kerfoot is bad,just saying we could go a different style of player there at 3 center

There is still room to manoeuvre after the Expansion draft,lots of players waiver exempt and not a bad contract on the team.
I love the Bogosian signing and there are hundreds on here that despised him last season as a signing. I was not one of them but he and Muzzin paired together when ever Keefe wants is a nasty piece of heavy defense. Keefe never had that option and in fairness to Babcock, he never had it either.
 
Last edited:

egd27

exspecta usque ad proximum annum
Sponsor
Jul 8, 2011
17,101
13,009
GTA
Some examples of what the approx 50% forward expenditure must compete against.

Toronto
Auston Matthews
John Tavares
Mitchell Marner
William Nylander

Tampa
Nikita Kucherov
Steven Stamkos
Brayden Point
Ondrej Palat
Yanni Gourde
Tyler Johnson

Vegas
Mark Stone
Max Pacioretty
William Karlsson
Jonathan Marchessault
Reilly Smith
Alex Tuch
Chandler Stephenson
Ryan Reaves

Colorado
Mikko Rantanen
Nathan MacKinnon
Brandon Saad
Gabriel Landeskog
Andre Burakovsky
Nazem Kadri

Boston
David Krejci
Patrice Bergeron
David Pastrnak
Brad Marchand
Charlie Coyle
Craig Smith
Ondrej Kase
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 666

Wafflewhipper

Registered User
Jan 18, 2014
14,114
5,694
Some examples of what the approx 50% forward expenditure must compete against.

Toronto
Auston Matthews
John Tavares. = 120 goals( over 50% of teams total)
Mitchell Marner
William Nylander

Tampa
Nikita Kucherov
Steven Stamkos
Brayden Point. =118 goals less than 50% of their scoring
Ondrej Palat
Yanni Gourde
Tyler Johnson = this guy they are trying to get rid of

Vegas
Mark Stone
Max Pacioretty
William Karlsson
Jonathan Marchessault. = 141 goals but almost half the team.5 goals more per extra player.
Reilly Smith
Alex Tuch
Chandler Stephenson
Ryan Reaves

Colorado
Mikko Rantanen
Nathan MacKinnon
Brandon Saad
Gabriel Landeskog
Andre Burakovsky
Nazem Kadri

Boston
David Krejci
Patrice Bergeron
David Pastrnak
Brad Marchand
Charlie Coyle
Craig Smith
Ondrej Kase

So thats just random as could be right. Just picking the top 4 and adding up the goals might give a different show. What teams are over 50% since i see approximately in your post. Our guys score like wizards and listing 8 players or 67% of a forward group to compare to 33% of a forward that outscores the bulk list doesn’t say much.
 
Last edited:

LeafsOHLRangers98

Registered User
Jun 13, 2017
6,652
6,807
Some examples of what the approx 50% forward expenditure must compete against.

Toronto
Auston Matthews
John Tavares
Mitchell Marner
William Nylander

Tampa
Nikita Kucherov
Steven Stamkos
Brayden Point
Ondrej Palat
Yanni Gourde
Tyler Johnson

Vegas
Mark Stone
Max Pacioretty
William Karlsson
Jonathan Marchessault
Reilly Smith
Alex Tuch
Chandler Stephenson
Ryan Reaves

Colorado
Mikko Rantanen
Nathan MacKinnon
Brandon Saad
Gabriel Landeskog
Andre Burakovsky
Nazem Kadri

Boston
David Krejci
Patrice Bergeron
David Pastrnak
Brad Marchand
Charlie Coyle
Craig Smith
Ondrej Kase
Why did you only add 4 forwards for us when you added guys like Kase/Burakovsky/Johnson/Tuch when guys like Kerfoot/Mikheyev were just as productive/more productive than a lot of these guys listed.
 

hotpaws

Registered User
Nov 21, 2009
22,031
6,640
Of course it's not random, it's some of the top teams in the league that the Leafs need to compete against. Isn't that the premise of the discussion?
the premise is to defend the Leafs using half there cap on 4 forwards
 

Wafflewhipper

Registered User
Jan 18, 2014
14,114
5,694
the premise to defend the Leafs using half there cap on 4 forwards
Put up 4 top players that out score their 120 goals and we are on premise. I don’t think thete is a group of four that beat them. ( maybe) haven’t checked myself?
 
Last edited:

egd27

exspecta usque ad proximum annum
Sponsor
Jul 8, 2011
17,101
13,009
GTA
Why did you only add 4 forwards for us when you added guys like Kase/Burakovsky/Johnson/Tuch when guys like Kerfoot/Mikheyev were just as productive/more productive than a lot of these guys listed.
Because the point was to show what forward other teams have using 50% of the cap
 

LeafsOHLRangers98

Registered User
Jun 13, 2017
6,652
6,807
I think its comparing what other teams have signed for the amount we are paying the big 4 forwards
Hmm possibly but I thought he was talking about all the teams that spend close to 50% of the cap on their forwards. In that sense the bottom of our lineup should still be more productive than most teams and our offense overall will probably be 1/2 with Tampa.
 

Wafflewhipper

Registered User
Jan 18, 2014
14,114
5,694
Why did you only add 4 forwards for us when you added guys like Kase/Burakovsky/Johnson/Tuch when guys like Kerfoot/Mikheyev were just as productive/more productive than a lot of these guys listed.
You are supposed to ignore that :) 4 players provide half our offense. Only a couple teams have that. None are as young. It’s because he is showing the amount of players taking up half the cap space.
 

Wafflewhipper

Registered User
Jan 18, 2014
14,114
5,694
Because the point was to show what forward other teams have using 50% of the cap
Maybe you should list the amount of players teams need to get over half their goal scoring also. We had the third most goals and Four players scored over half them.
 

LeafsOHLRangers98

Registered User
Jun 13, 2017
6,652
6,807
Because the point was to show what forward other teams have using 50% of the cap
Okay but we spend just over 50% of the cap on our entire forward group (about 54%). So we pay to have the most expensive offense for a group that will likely finish 1st or 2nd in the league if healthy. you pay for what you get.

If we get a middle of the pack defense and middle of the pack goaltending (also what we pay for) then this should be a top 10 team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wafflewhipper

Wafflewhipper

Registered User
Jan 18, 2014
14,114
5,694
which is much more important than winning the cup
No no, never said a word about the cup. The top 4 haven’t tied management’s hands in re grouping the roster. It actually got better to this point. No negative effect because of 4 high salaries everyone complains about with zero context but it is readily accepted without question. I question it because i say the roster got betterment and kept all the core and improved it actually. Are you of the thinking this regroup is a worse team? If you do think its worse we shouldn’t even discuss this further. I say it’s definitely improved
 

egd27

exspecta usque ad proximum annum
Sponsor
Jul 8, 2011
17,101
13,009
GTA
Put up 4 top players that out score their 120 goals and we are on premise.
No, not just 4 players.......the number of forwards that represent 50% of the cap.

Using my previous list, goals by forwards representing 50% of the cap

Toronto 120
Tampa 128
Vegas 141
Colorado 135
Boston 161
 
  • Like
Reactions: 666

Wafflewhipper

Registered User
Jan 18, 2014
14,114
5,694
But then the cap is not 50%, for those teams, it would be less.
Yes. Our four still have a full 4 years of cap stability and five with Tavares and Marner.Simply Hyman‘s goals added to make 5 and $2.25 Equaled a list of 8 from Vegas ha. The Four are actually less than 50% of the cap too by the way. He approximated and might even be over on them.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad