GDT: Let the Free Agency Madness begin

Status
Not open for further replies.

Lempo

Recovering Future Considerations Truther
Feb 23, 2014
27,729
86,713
With the rumors of Aho's contract being a slight discount and there also "still being some work to do", I wonder if Aho told the org: "Make some changes, make us better, and I will take a small haircut. But if you just run it back again, I want to get PAAAIIIIDDDDD."

Donny doing his best to make Aho proud this offseason.
This is a though that I have been wondering. There's A, the sum he absolutely needs to get, there's B, the sum he plausibly should get, and there's B-A, the difference that Aho would be ok with if the team used it to sign a competitive roster instead of paying it to him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MinJaBen

AD Skinner

Registered User
Mar 18, 2009
13,298
40,977
bubble bath
And then there’s B-A Baracus


BABaracus.jpg
 

Surrounded By Ahos

Las Vegas Desert Ducks Official Team Poster
May 24, 2008
27,175
84,748
Koko Miami
Hi friends. I asked @Surrounded By Ahos this yesterday, but he totally blew me off, so I am asking this in here.

You know Dundon? Is there another one out there? I'm actually dead serious. And desperate.
In my defense I am a moron and forgot to respond.

No Cap, I don’t know any billionaires. If I did I would probably be chilling on their mega yacht in the Ionian Sea right now instead of checking hf on my lunch break.
 

moses malone 12

Registered User
Oct 19, 2020
481
978
Has anyone seen this?

I hope this isn't true, because the Canes would get hosed in this deal

Rumor: Pesce, Jarvis #1, #2 for Erik Karlsson…​


Carolina really wants to get this done and San Jose really can’t do better…The Hawks would take on some of the Cap hit…
Source: Eklund
Discuss this Rumor
Eklund is a f*ckin goof. he's misses by a mile on trades and says "hey dont blame me I only post rumors" total assclown.
 

Boom Boom Apathy

I am the Professor. Deal with it!
Sep 6, 2006
49,409
102,427
The Canes need to send the Rangers a prospect and a #1 for Trocheck. Then the Rangers can resign Tarasenko with that money and the Canes solve the center problem.
Not interested. I'd rather upgrade on wing than bring Trocheck back. I liked him when he was here, but
1) not taking on 6 more years for him at his age
2) he wasn't the answer when he was here before. He wasn't the problem, but he wasn't the answer.

EDIT: Also, he has a full NMC right now, so he signed in NY because he wanted to be there.
 

SlavinAway

Registered Jerk
Sponsor
Jul 7, 2017
3,227
12,158
Seravelli on Threads now - Frank Seravalli (@dfofrankseravalli) on Threads

"Some hockey news to pass along. Sounds like #Oilers are in a bit of a holding pattern with their two RFAs. May not be able to fully execute new bridge deal for Evan Bouchard until Ryan McLeod file is completed. McLeod, of course, filed for arbitration on Wednesday. Bouchard doesn’t have arbitration rights. There’s only so much cap space left to dole out."

With Tank seemingly out let's get back to offersheet discussions.
 

Nikishin Go Boom

Russian Bulldozer Consultent
Jul 31, 2017
23,708
55,334
I would still offer sheet Lafreniere. Rangers are within 6 million of the ceiling. Would they guarantee Scanlin or Pajuniemi more guaranteed money on their next deal if they file for arbitration so they had some buyout protection for an offer sheet?

could we flip TDA in the Karlsson deal? cuz Karlsson, Burns, Coghlan and TDA are 2 too many Righty PP guys.
 

Svechhammer

THIS is hockey?
Jun 8, 2017
25,673
93,490
I would still offer sheet Lafreniere. Rangers are within 6 million of the ceiling. Would they guarantee Scanlin or Pajuniemi more guaranteed money on their next deal if they file for arbitration so they had some buyout protection for an offer sheet?

could we flip TDA in the Karlsson deal? cuz Karlsson, Burns, Coghlan and TDA are 2 too many Righty PP guys.
Coghlan is a 7th defender for the season. We signed him as a quality reserve, not an everyday player
 

FlyingSquirrels

Registered User
Jul 5, 2011
1,887
2,247
i understand what Coghlan is but we would still need an extra shutdown defender too with that lineup.
Not if you're scoring 5 goals a game you wouldn't. If we get Karlsson and Tank, I bet we'd do exactly that.
Dundon would love the entertainment value of 5-4 games every night. Rod not so much!
 

Nikishin Go Boom

Russian Bulldozer Consultent
Jul 31, 2017
23,708
55,334
Not if you're scoring 5 goals a game you wouldn't. If we get Karlsson and Tank, I bet we'd do exactly that.
Dundon would love the entertainment value of 5-4 games every night. Rod not so much!
i think Dundon is passed the creating entertainment to sell tickets phase. We are in the trying to win a cup phase. It will be hard to do if we struggle with defense in the playoffs.
 

spockBokk

Registered User
Sep 8, 2013
7,493
18,986
Has anything been reported on when the prospect camp is this year?

Only think I’ve seen is that they were maybe inviting Nadea’s brother, but nothing on timing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: A Star is Burns

SlavinAway

Registered Jerk
Sponsor
Jul 7, 2017
3,227
12,158
I would still offer sheet Lafreniere. Rangers are within 6 million of the ceiling. Would they guarantee Scanlin or Pajuniemi more guaranteed money on their next deal if they file for arbitration so they had some buyout protection for an offer sheet?

could we flip TDA in the Karlsson deal? cuz Karlsson, Burns, Coghlan and TDA are 2 too many Righty PP guys.

If we get Karlsson then sure go after Laf; but otherwise I think Bouchard is the better target. Would give us a more likely 1RD Burns replacement than counting on Morrow to be able to fill that role.

Use Pesce/Skjei to target another forward in that scenario.
 

Nikishin Go Boom

Russian Bulldozer Consultent
Jul 31, 2017
23,708
55,334
If we get Karlsson then sure go after Laf; but otherwise I think Bouchard is the better target. Would give us a more likely 1RD Burns replacement than counting on Morrow to be able to fill that role.

Use Pesce/Skjei to target another forward in that scenario.
i think Edmonton has enough O.S protection right now. The have 5.5 mil in space plus McLeod going to arbitration to allow them to buy out Campbell or another player if need be.
 

SlavinAway

Registered Jerk
Sponsor
Jul 7, 2017
3,227
12,158
i think Edmonton has enough O.S protection right now. The have 5.5 mil in space plus McLeod going to arbitration to allow them to buy out Campbell or another player if need be.

Could be the case. I think the offer would have to be well into the 1/2/3 compensation tier to work. Looking like McLeod will probably end up on a bridge deal somewhere around $2m. That would account for 12 forwards. They'd have to replace Campbell somehow; maybe DeSmith at $1.8m.

I think they could make it work but if we went 1x8.5ish they'd also have to move Foegele (and probably get bent in a trade) and bring in another league min forward.
 

chaz4hockey

Old man but still a PP2 Candidate
Sponsor
Jan 21, 2021
8,580
18,249
Naples, FL
Could be the case. I think the offer would have to be well into the 1/2/3 compensation tier to work. Looking like McLeod will probably end up on a bridge deal somewhere around $2m. That would account for 12 forwards. They'd have to replace Campbell somehow; maybe DeSmith at $1.8m.

I think they could make it work but if we went 1x8.5ish they'd also have to move Foegele (and probably get bent in a trade) and bring in another league min forward.
I like Bouchard and the thought of weakening the Oilers too is OK.
 

Nikishin Go Boom

Russian Bulldozer Consultent
Jul 31, 2017
23,708
55,334
Will be funny if the holdup is the TDA trade.
I have an odd feeling he is included in the Karlsson deal with DW mentioning we are still negotiating with Skjei. I don’t see us sitting Chatfield and why have 2 depth RHS pp guys? If Skjei was being traded too, i could see a TDA staying.
We wanted TDA until SJ became serious about retaining money to make a EK move happen. So to keep from burning bridges we’ll take the TDA deal still and then flip to SJ. SJ doesn’t mind because his cap hit will be low enough at the deadline he could be worth a good asset.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad