vadim sharifijanov
Registered User
- Oct 10, 2007
- 30,110
- 18,570
I think at the time it looked bad on him. There were two guys who had limited playing time and one was St. Louis and the other was Subban. There was a big difference in their attitudes and I am pretty sure most of us would have guessed Subban as the more entitled one right? Well, we were wrong. St. Louis is the reigning Art Ross winner and Subban is the reigning Norris winner and both deserved more ice time I think. Subban seemed to take it in stride and had a happy go lucky attitude about it by the looks of it, even getting right close to Toews and Crosby smiling ear to ear for the gold medal picture. St. Louis seemed more upset about it more so that his own GM in Tampa (Yzerman) didn't initially pick him.
We saw the same thing in Toronto with Joseph in 2002 after Quinn replaced him with Brodeur in the Olympics. I mean, check your ego at the door on those teams, you are all stars.
not to condone msl's behaviour, but at the same time much easier to have a just happy to be here attitude as a young guy at the beginning of your career than an old guy on his last kick of the can.
of subban doesn't make the next team, and with canada's loaded right side he might not, i think he will retrospectively be a lot more bitter that pietrangelo played ahead of him in '14.
Interesting. So you think they would prefer that things don't get brought up again about how a junior coach could abuse his power against a guy for so long without anyone helping him? I am not an expert in sexual abuse, but I will say that these guys are master manipulators. It wasn't as if Graham James was doing this stuff out in the open. He was Fleury's coach, among other boys. Nobody, including the parents or boarders would bat an eyelash if a coach is hanging around his players in a chummy way. I am not saying there aren't those that were "in the know" about this that could have helped (Penn State is an example) but to think that everyone around James or Fleury should have seen what was happening is really underrating the genius that is a man like James. Think about Ariel Castro in Cleveland holding three girls captive in his own home for a decade. How does a next door neighbour not know this? Would you know your neighbour is doing this? I wouldn't. It isn't as if these guys aren't masters at hiding things.
That being said you really think that's the reason Fleury is being kept out, just to maintain the image of junior hockey?
i don't really think there are guys out there where you could say they knew and did nothing, like say harold ballard. i mean maybe, but i like to assume better of people than that unless given a reason not to. so i don't mean it to sound quite as sinister as you are maybe taking it.
but at the same time, i do think that how hockey canada operates, and how the HHOF operates, and in a way how canada in general operates, is you avoid a fuss if you can avoid a fuss. and i think serious questions that could be asked during a dissection of fleury's career, those are questions best avoided from the perspective of the hhof committee.
and in a way, there is also potentially an indictment on the very institution of canadian major junior hockey that accompanies a close hard look at fleury's story, with questions about who is profiting from basically free labour from kids who in many cases are also being deprived of a high school education, and what those interested stakeholders are letting slide-- and if you ask me that is a much needed discussion to have. but i digress.