Golden_Jet
Registered User
- Sep 21, 2005
- 26,006
- 13,419
Why is that cheap real estate land.I think taking out lesplanade Laurier is the prime location.
Why is that cheap real estate land.I think taking out lesplanade Laurier is the prime location.
who said anything about it being cheap?Why is that cheap real estate land.
That was my original question, it’s going to be really expensive, and JD1 responds with an area, I guess he quoted me, but ignored the question then.who said anything about it being cheap?
I think he just was saying that would be an ideal location, it's not like Lebreton will be free, the question is whether the extra cost is worth the superior location, but we have no idea how much more expensive one would be over the other.That was my original question, it’s going to be really expensive, and JD1 responds with an area, I guess he quoted me, but ignored the question then.
without a doubt lesplanade will be way more money. There is a revenue generating tower and commercial space. No chance for a buy and tear down.I think he just was saying that would be an ideal location, it's not like Lebreton will be free, the question is whether the extra cost is worth the superior location, but we have no idea how much more expensive one would be over the other.
Lesplanade is a site the feds are getting rid of. You haven't been able to drink the water there for 10+ years.Of course, they ar
without a doubt lesplanade will be way more money. There is a revenue generating tower and commercial space. No chance for a buy and tear down.
Lesplanade is a site the feds are getting rid of. You haven't been able to drink the water there for 10+ years.
The feds own the building and the land. If the land is vacant what is it worth? If the buildings are sold to developers to strip bare and rebuild, what's that worth?
A rink and hotel would probably fit there. Iirc the east of Gloucester is not built up.
Here's the problem with that location though: the feds screw up literally everything. It'd take them years just to figure out how to assemble a committee to hire consultants to write a report on what the land is worth. And part way thru that, the hiring consultants bit would get delayed as the feds pause, due to the ArriveCan fiasco, to study new contracting processes prior to letting a contract to study the lands value.
Have you done a study on this? For a small fee I can get you a qualified group to do a study about who could do the study.Lesplanade is a site the feds are getting rid of. You haven't been able to drink the water there for 10+ years.
The feds own the building and the land. If the land is vacant what is it worth? If the buildings are sold to developers to strip bare and rebuild, what's that worth?
A rink and hotel would probably fit there. Iirc the east of Gloucester is not built up.
Here's the problem with that location though: the feds screw up literally everything. It'd take them years just to figure out how to assemble a committee to hire consultants to write a report on what the land is worth. And part way thru that, the hiring consultants bit would get delayed as the feds pause, due to the ArriveCan fiasco, to study new contracting processes prior to letting a contract to study the lands value.
There is a revenue canada building between Billings Bridge, the RA centre, and the CBC building that is vacant. It is a fair sized bit of land. Has the light rail running by it. Could be another interesting option
DND is to small as is.Esplanade and DND are way better options for the city than LeBreton.
They both feed into existing infrastructure which would help the core immensely.
Lebreton makes the most sense for all stakeholders.Esplanade and DND are way better options for the city than LeBreton.
They both feed into existing infrastructure which would help the core immensely.
101 Colonel by would be sweet, but I believe dnd is there for the next ten years so best case scenario we aren't putting shovels in the ground for a long time.Esplanade and DND are way better options for the city than LeBreton.
They both feed into existing infrastructure which would help the core immensely.
101 Colonel by would be sweet, but I believe dnd is there for the next ten years so best case scenario we aren't putting shovels in the ground for a long time.
All governments do it We'd have had commuter rail - a system that works, no less - if John Baird hadn't stepped in to cancel the approved and funded plan that council had already approved before Mr. Zero Means Zero was elected mayor.Not to mention if there is a change in Government, and the flavour of the last decade or so, is to undo whatever the previous government did, and “do it right”…..one just has to look across the street from the Civic Hospital, where the New Hospital would already be up and operational, if the current government had just left things alone….. so there is that.
It's big enough to fit the arena and that's it, so if they do it there, they'd need something beyond just that. I don't really see it as a viable option, but given that a move there would be 10 years away at minimum, I suppose a lot can change.DND is to small as is.
Esplanade site is only about 3.5 acres. They would need adjoining pieces of land to make it work.Lesplanade is a site the feds are getting rid of. You haven't been able to drink the water there for 10+ years.
The feds own the building and the land. If the land is vacant what is it worth? If the buildings are sold to developers to strip bare and rebuild, what's that worth?
A rink and hotel would probably fit there. Iirc the east of Gloucester is not built up.
Here's the problem with that location though: the feds screw up literally everything. It'd take them years just to figure out how to assemble a committee to hire consultants to write a report on what the land is worth. And part way thru that, the hiring consultants bit would get delayed as the feds pause, due to the ArriveCan fiasco, to study new contracting processes prior to letting a contract to study the lands value.
Pretty sure someone measured it out and Esplanade is not big enough, but I am more in favour of an arena that will revitalize downtown proper not some barren toxic waste field like Lebreton. Bayview would be great tooLesplanade is a site the feds are getting rid of. You haven't been able to drink the water there for 10+ years.
The feds own the building and the land. If the land is vacant what is it worth? If the buildings are sold to developers to strip bare and rebuild, what's that worth?
A rink and hotel would probably fit there. Iirc the east of Gloucester is not built up.
Here's the problem with that location though: the feds screw up literally everything. It'd take them years just to figure out how to assemble a committee to hire consultants to write a report on what the land is worth. And part way thru that, the hiring consultants bit would get delayed as the feds pause, due to the ArriveCan fiasco, to study new contracting processes prior to letting a contract to study the lands value.
Why. It’s nowhere close to anything.The land beside Hurdman station is a perfect location
Not much there, there are better options.The land beside Hurdman station is a perfect location
I suppose it depends on what their priorities are, just off the top of my head, they all seem to offer something a bit different.Not much there, there are better options.