the devil is in the details.
The whole argument over corporate structure is essentially, who gets what. I think asking trinity to build an arena is a bit rich. But, I could see 2 models evolving. One where a portion of the arena is paid for by trinity indirectly, funded by housing sales/rental income. The other, where melnyk gets a piece of the real estate return. This is what they cannot agree on. The other variable is ownership of the senators-to what degree does melnyk retain control. And trinity's other projects in the area.
Real estate returns can yield 15-20%. entertainment revenues will increase at least 10-20%. this project is certainly viable, but asking trinity to pay for the whole stadium is a non-starter. This is melnyk's way. He simply borrows of his equity holdings, and puts in as little capital as possible-his equity is never at risk. The borrowing is offset by the valuation.
at this juncture, with this size of project, he needs to place a bet-if he can't he needs to step aside. Otherwise he puts a lot at risk. His best move right now is to sell and let the new owner inherit the RVL contract and complete it.