Havoc
Registered User
- Jul 25, 2009
- 7,334
- 7,600
Anybody know what happened? why is marner ticked? I missed it
Pretty sure with himself. Defence wasn't good for last 2 shifts.
Anybody know what happened? why is marner ticked? I missed it
1st line very very bad
2nd line very very good
3rd line good
4th line ok
All defencemen were good.
Who’d have wondered that muzzins best games are when he doesn’t weigh 200
mrazek- I don’t like
#teamcampbell
Leafs 5 Red Wings 4. Feels like a Win to me.Feels like a loss to me
I put no stock in perimeter shots or "advanced stats". What I saw was a pretty evenly matched back and forth game. Maybe, and it's a maybe, one Leafs (Tavares) line "dominated" but that's not indicative of the game as a whole.Large parts of this game yes. They were up 33 shots to 19 at one point. They had double the scoring chances. They had 4 more minutes of puck possession in the offensive zone. The 3rd period was not great though, despite scoring a couple goals. They had some bad bad giveaways.
Can we not do this negativity baloney and pretend like they didn't have a good game just because it wasn't 10-0.
Provide your thoughts on the game if you disagree.
Probably a benching. He wasn’t great, but wasn’t bad per say. Let’s use holl as a barometer, everyone was above that level imo. I still would’ve played him but moved him down or something or just played him less, but not completely benched him, this game was 5-2 with average goaltendingEhh I agree except Dermott was garbage, just IMO.
-His break passes were really spotty coughing up possession needlessly over and over.
-The announcers were all praising Marner for a back check which he only had to make because Dermott lost his positioning and his man. Marner screamed an F bomb after, it coulda been regarding something else but I thought it was due to Dermott's play.
-Dermott's odd pass to Matthews directly cause a goal like 1.5 seconds later. I know people are knocking Matthews on it and they aren't entirely wrong... but the only play for him to make there is to press it into the boards and buy some time. If that was the outcome Dermott wanted he should have just done it himself instead of dishing it to someone else to do it in the same spot a quarter second later. I'm pretty sure that's why it caught Matthews off guard, but Matthews was also not very impressive tonight so who knows.
-Pretty sure I've seen Matthews frustrated over a dermott play multiple times, but of course it could be about other things and I'm misattributing it.
I just assumed Dermott got benched. Any word if it was benching or injury?
Thank god keefe benched Matthews. If not we’d be in overtime rn or worse. That line was so bad, they need to regroup and come back better next famr
Matthews played like a weenie and deserved to get sat. If I didn't know any better I'd swear his has pouting about not playing with Mitch.Keefe could have helped with the mojo. Matthews should have been on for the empty net time. Plain and simple.
Engvall, Kampf and Kerfoot out there instead of matthews lol
I'm almost positive it was a benching and saw the same you did with Dermott.Ehh I agree except Dermott was garbage, just IMO.
-His break passes were really spotty coughing up possession needlessly over and over.
-The announcers were all praising Marner for a back check which he only had to make because Dermott lost his positioning and his man. Marner screamed an F bomb after, it coulda been regarding something else but I thought it was due to Dermott's play.
-Dermott's odd pass to Matthews directly cause a goal like 1.5 seconds later. I know people are knocking Matthews on it and they aren't entirely wrong... but the only play for him to make there is to press it into the boards and buy some time. If that was the outcome Dermott wanted he should have just done it himself instead of dishing it to someone else to do it in the same spot a quarter second later. I'm pretty sure that's why it caught Matthews off guard, but Matthews was also not very impressive tonight so who knows.
-Pretty sure I've seen Matthews frustrated over a dermott play multiple times, but of course it could be about other things and I'm misattributing it.
I just assumed Dermott got benched. Any word if it was benching or injury?
They kinda did nothing on the ice. Remember Aberg? Malgin? Gauthier? When those guys were on the ice, nothing happened, like not in a positive way, but not really in a negative way either. Matthews and nylander were exactly that, for the most part, excluding like two Matthews rushes, both of them just went through the motions. Nylanders forecheck had less speed and intensity. Matthews finish and off puck play was atrocious. With the way mrazek was playing, I wouldn’t be surprised that it had gone to overtime had they been out. So in that sense, I guess it isn’t just that line and Matthews that the idea of overtime came upMatthews line wasn’t good tonight but they weren’t bad either. They needed to create more, but they didn’t really give up much of anything either.
Of our top guys Matthews was on the ice for least amount of goals against. So there’s nothing to this idea we’d have been in OT if he played in the final 2 mins
Johns last name is Marner?![]()
It doesn’t matter. 11m isn’t for just working hard, it’s for not making mistakes and also converting. Matthews did neither, he tried and still gave a goal up. He wasn’t good enough for this game. Marners been benched, nylander has been too, and so has Tavares. It’s not hard, if you aren’t playing well, you should be benched. Doesn’t matter of the name
Feels like a loss to me
It's called closing out a game. Matthews gets the last few mins when we're down, not when we're leading...
This will NEVER get old!
Matthews problems have spanned 5 or 6 games now, playing him 3 minutes more wasn’t gonna change anything. Especially with the way his line played. They need to regroup and come back more feisty next game also with more intensity.benching players largely doesn’t work. You need guys to actually work through their problems in action and through coaching