keonsbitterness
Registered User
That rule no longer applies when the goalie is pulled.Same. The puck passing through the crease always negated it.
That rule no longer applies when the goalie is pulled.Same. The puck passing through the crease always negated it.
nah he big leaf fandont polute my screen screen with bruce brown, gradey can stay though.
…but in the end, they are still outscoring the other side and that is the bottom line I guess.
You do know that the poster is concerned about this being sustainable, right?Yes, I guess scoring more goals than your opponent is still kinda important even though it sounds much more impressive to ramble on about “expected Corsi index percentage allowed”
Interesting. What’s the rationale?That rule no longer applies when the goalie is pulled.
You didn't tell us you were from Bahston!Now just imagine if Reaves had threw the exact same hit on Fox.....endless masochism from our "hometown" media for sure.
This is why Bunting and Rielly received two of the hashest suspensions the last half decade and this will get nothing.
If a Leaf player gets injured by a cheap shot and the media deosnt make a sound, did it ever really happen?
Only a couple more months my man. He was solid when we first signed him, but has regressed badly since last season. I’m looking forward to replacing that $5m in cap space with a more solid player next year.I can count on one hand how many good games Brodie has had this year and I'm missing two fingers........
I think D pairings also play a factor in advance stats such as xGF% though. Esp if the stats is being caved in.You do know that the poster is concerned about this being sustainable, right?
The reason people like stats such as xGF% is because it highlights who is outplaying the opposition. If you're outchancing your opponent consistently on top of outscoring them, that suggests there is something reproducible there. For example, Matthews/Marner are consistently at the top of the xGF% lists and surprise surprise, we see them dominate year in and year out. In L2's case, they are outscoring their opposition but are also being outchanced. That works over a small sample size like we have right now, but over the longterm it may not last unless we continue to get excellent finishing from someone like Bertuzzi
I like the Nylander line and want it to work (I'm a person who has wanted the core 4 spread out for years now), but the poster is pointing out some valid concerns with their defensive deficiencies. The question becomes can Keefe shelter them enough to limit the defensive gaps in their game and take advantage of how dynamic they can be in the offensive zone
If the McMann - Tavares - Jarnkrok line can continue to excel over a longer stretch this current setup may be feasible as L3 can take some of the harder matchups allowing Nylander's line to play against weak competition. With that said, this will be tougher on the road where our opponent will be able to dictate matchups more easily
Because Gary Bettman said soInteresting. What’s the rationale?
You do know that the poster is concerned about this being sustainable, right?
The reason people like stats such as xGF% is because it highlights who is outplaying the opposition. If you're outchancing your opponent consistently on top of outscoring them, that suggests there is something reproducible there. For example, Matthews/Marner are consistently at the top of the xGF% lists and surprise surprise, we see them dominate year in and year out. In L2's case, they are outscoring their opposition but are also being outchanced. That works over a small sample size like we have right now, but over the longterm it may not last unless we continue to get excellent finishing from someone like Bertuzzi
I like the Nylander line and want it to work (I'm a person who has wanted the core 4 spread out for years now), but the poster is pointing out some valid concerns with their defensive deficiencies. The question becomes can Keefe shelter them enough to limit the defensive gaps in their game and take advantage of how dynamic they can be in the offensive zone
If the McMann - Tavares - Jarnkrok line can continue to excel over a longer stretch this current setup may be feasible as L3 can take some of the harder matchups allowing Nylander's line to play against weak competition. With that said, this will be tougher on the road where our opponent will be able to dictate matchups more easily
Also took a stick in the face earlier, but he was benched for curling just outside the blueline on a failed clearing attempt.Was it a benching? Think Willy took a puck of the face on his last 1st period shift that looked like it hurt a bit.
I'd be more concerned about zone starts than pairings, since we're relatively balanced there, but it looks like Domi's line doesn't get a ton of Dzone startsI think D pairings also play a factor in advance stats such as xGF% though. Esp if the stats is being caved in.
Lmao you don't need advanced stats to tell you Domi is incompetent at Defence and that line would be eaten alive in the playoffs.Leafs are 9-1 in their past ten games and 13-3 in their past 16.
Not sure about you, but I don’t need to study advanced metrics to realize that it’s totally unsustainable for Toronto to win at a 90% clip or even an 80% clip between now and the end of June.
It’s impossible for any team in the NHL to win at that rate.
Does this team look better right now than at any point so far this season? Yes, without question.
Does this team look better right now than at any point in the past half decade? Yes, absolutely.
So even though they won’t win at a 90% rate or an 80% rate, they’ve galvanized into a championship contender.
Why would anyone advocate for disrupting this by mixing all the lines into another jumbled clusterfack?
Worse still, why would anyone want the Leafs to give up what little they have in terms of draft picks and prospects just to add a mediocre forward based on what some meaningless spreadsheet says?
Lmao you don't need advanced stats to tell you Domi is incompetent at Defence and that line would be eaten alive in the playoffs.
Just look at his Dzone coverage - effectively boxing out Casper the Ghost. Bertuzzi and Nylander are also poor D-zone players- they need a babysitter.
Despite being moved to 3C AND not having PP1 time anymore, Tavares still gets played like a 2C. It's a huge problem, and one MGMT lacks resources to fix if they are still chasing that RD for Rielly.
Agreed 100%. The game is played on the ice not a spread sheet. Anything with expected this or expected that is not based in realityThat’s why you have to actually watch the games instead of just looking at the stat sheet, my friend.
Domi and Bert are playing their best hockey of the year since being paired with Nylander.
The other three lines are playing great together - - why would you want to disrupt their chemistry? It makes ZERO sense.
This the NHL, we don't need no stinkin' rationale !!Interesting. What’s the rationale?
But I am not surprised at those stats though.I'd be more concerned about zone starts than pairings, since we're relatively balanced there, but it looks like Domi's line doesn't get a ton of Dzone starts
Yes, I guess scoring more goals than your opponent is still kinda important even though it sounds much more impressive to ramble on about “expected Corsi index percentage allowed”
I wouldn't expect it to last with those numbers, personally. Bert's running hot right now, which does even out his earlier struggles and being snakebitten, but hard to see that continuing.But I am not surprised at those stats though.
As those three are not really known as defensive first players. Willie can(if he wants to) do well with backcheck and stripping pucks.
As long as they score more, that’s all it matters
I think half of Bert’s goals are on the PP.I wouldn't expect it to last with those numbers, personally. Bert's running hot right now, which does even out his earlier struggles and being snakebitten, but hard to see that continuing.
If they're going to find success they need to do a better job maintaining possession and limiting chances.
Probably to give the team with six skaters a better chance.Interesting. What’s the rationale?