We've seen worse contracts moved around the league. I think the Leafs will be okay.The game is about speed these days, even in the bottom 6. Ritchie doesnt get around very well. Leafs will have done well if they move that signing. Good look trading a guy that cleared waivers.
???
You called someone out for getting their facts wrong, yet you completely made up that Richie had a 30 goal pace. I see that you've now lowered the bar to just "being productive" so you obviously know that you're wrong.
Teams also had a chance to take a flyer on him when he was on waivers and available to the whole league for free. No one wanted him.
Being in his "prime" is irrelevant when he sucks.
You’d have to add a 2nd just to get Nicole.
I think there’s a better chance he’s a cap ballast in a deadline upgrade. Selling teams still need to ice a roster, and if Nick manages to put anything decent together the rest of this year and next he’ll be ones of next deadlines most desirable players.He will move, it may cost us though.
Because of the pandemic there are alot of teams that want to get rid of long term injury contract.He’s signed for 1 more year at a $2.5 mil cap hit, but if we buy him out, it’s $300K next year, $1.1 mil the year after. So that’s kinda like $1.4 mil total retention, but I think spread out over 2 years is a bit better than all in one.
Based on that, I think we’d do something like Ritchie, $1 mil retained, for nothing (well, filler like a conditional 7th). And maybe there’s someone out there who wants 1 year of Ritchie for $1.5 mil? Probably?
The game is about speed these days, even in the bottom 6. Ritchie doesnt get around very well. Leafs will have done well if they move that signing. Good look trading a guy that cleared waivers.
Subban is UFA so that means Leafs add one of their top young Dmen?Nick Richie and Rasmus Sandin to the Devils for PK Subban at 50% retained.
In case you didnt know Subban is playin great.
GMs make moves for alot of different reasons.I'm not offended that you are delusional. What team would give an asset for Ritchie and take on that salary next season? Why didnt they take him on waivers. Get real.
lol people so shook that I won't pretend this is some albatross contract like Savard or Gallagher or Petry and a team might be willing to take him because they see value in them. Seriously the amount of people replying to me upset about this is hilarious.
Twenty years ago Ritchie was only six years old. He was big for his age, but likely still too small for professional hockey.Ritchie might have been a useful player 20 years ago.
I don't think he meant that literallyTwenty years ago Ritchie was only six years old. He was big for his age, but likely still too small for professional hockey.
With Toronto supposedly interested in Chiarot, I'm wondering if Leaf fans would be willing to swallow the asking price if we take back Ritchie at full cap.
It’s way shorter and cheaper (particularly in terms of a cap hit) than those, so much so that I don’t really understand the comparison.lol people so shook that I won't pretend this is some albatross contract like Savard or Gallagher or Petry and a team might be willing to take him because they see value in them. Seriously the amount of people replying to me upset about this is hilarious.
I didnt say he was impossible to move so not sure why you are quoting me. I said he sucks and has no value. Dubas basically flushed $5 million dollars. You could staple him to assets to move himGMs make moves for alot of different reasons.
1 year remaining isnt that bad and getting assets back for 1 season is something alot of GMs look for
players get passed on waivers then traded for all the time
seems like the only delusional one is you basically saying Ritchie is impossible to move
I heard scouts from Hostess, Drakes and Entenmanns are all there.Just a heads up - Ritchie is playing his first game for the Marlies tonight. He's already scored.
Are there any scouts at the game and is that why he's playing?
Link: TheAHL.com | The American Hockey League
The game is about speed these days, even in the bottom 6. Ritchie doesnt get around very well. Leafs will have done well if they move that signing. Good look trading a guy that cleared waivers.