Confirmed with Link: Leafs sign F Ryan Reaves (3 years, $1.3M AAV)

Mess

Global Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
87,808
13,474
Leafs Home Board

First look at Ryan Reaves in his Toronto Maple Leafs gear​


When the free agent market opened on July 1st, the Toronto Maple Leafs wasted no time in putting pen to paper with veteran enforcer Ryan Reaves, signing him to a 3-year deal, worth $1.35M per season.

Leafs GM Brad Treliving spoke following the signing, revealing that while Reavo's tenacity and strength were important qualities, he was actually brought in to add another dynamic to the room, which he had viewed as a bit of a "quiet group" prior to Reaves' arrival.

Reaves spoke about what he can bring to the group following his signing, admitting that he will try to be the glue that holds the team together and keeps them close both at home and on the road.

1690377496737.png


Not only will Reaves act as a bit of a deterrent on the ice, protecting the Leafs' top players and dissuading the opposition from taking liberties on them, but he'll also serve an important role off the ice with the team, keeping everyone together and building some additional chemistry and also doing valuable work within the community.
 

Nineteen67

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Dec 12, 2017
25,048
11,718

First look at Ryan Reaves in his Toronto Maple Leafs gear​


When the free agent market opened on July 1st, the Toronto Maple Leafs wasted no time in putting pen to paper with veteran enforcer Ryan Reaves, signing him to a 3-year deal, worth $1.35M per season.

Leafs GM Brad Treliving spoke following the signing, revealing that while Reavo's tenacity and strength were important qualities, he was actually brought in to add another dynamic to the room, which he had viewed as a bit of a "quiet group" prior to Reaves' arrival.

Reaves spoke about what he can bring to the group following his signing, admitting that he will try to be the glue that holds the team together and keeps them close both at home and on the road.

View attachment 731300

Not only will Reaves act as a bit of a deterrent on the ice, protecting the Leafs' top players and dissuading the opposition from taking liberties on them, but he'll also serve an important role off the ice with the team, keeping everyone together and building some additional chemistry and also doing valuable work within the community.
Looks good in the kit, it’s too bad this pic wasn't taken prior to an alumni game
 
  • Haha
Reactions: mclaren55

notbias

Registered User
Feb 16, 2017
11,904
9,936
Without Reaves signed, any of Robertson, McMann, Gambrell, and Steeves could have played and we'd be cap compliant with 12-7-2

We will see how they do it, but signing Reaves could potentially make us lose someone like Timmins.

Not only will Reaves act as a bit of a deterrent on the ice, protecting the Leafs' top players and dissuading the opposition from taking liberties on them, but he'll also serve an important role off the ice with the team, keeping everyone together and building some additional chemistry and also doing valuable work within the community.

When has an enforcer ever acted as a deterrent?
 

LEAFANFORLIFE23

Registered User
Jun 17, 2010
47,391
16,032
This is just an incredibly stupid, knee-jerk move.

They say we need toughness? Great! I'll just get the toughest one of 'em all! This'll make Matthews and Marner score in the playoffs when we need them!

Just completely oblivious to the real needs of the team, and/or completely unwilling to pay the price to get the kind of players we need to balance out our top-6.

And we just wanted him so bad that we just had to lock him up right as free agency opened up. I just can't even.

Dubas would not be making moves like this. We needed changes but keeping the coach and the core 4, and adding a goon doesn't constitute change.

This is the bleakest offseason I can remember. There's zero reason for optimism right now.

He had permission to talk to other teams, he was locked up before free agency started

Without Reaves signed, any of Robertson, McMann, Gambrell, and Steeves could have played and we'd be cap compliant with 12-7-2

We will see how they do it, but signing Reaves could potentially make us lose someone like Timmins.



When has an enforcer ever acted as a deterrent?

If they lose Timmins it will not be because they signed Ryan Reaves
 

notbias

Registered User
Feb 16, 2017
11,904
9,936
If they lose Timmins it will not be because they signed Ryan Reaves

Which newly signed player is the reason? They knew the cap restraints they had.

Reaves is the obvious odd man out who has virtually no reason to be on the team.

He also conveniently allows any of those players to play, making our team better, and we keep our 7D.
 

LEAFANFORLIFE23

Registered User
Jun 17, 2010
47,391
16,032
Which newly signed player is the reason? They knew the cap restraints they had.

Reaves is the obvious odd man out who has virtually no reason to be on the team.

He also conveniently allows any of those players to play, making our team better, and we keep our 7D.

I mean you could use your argument for any of the new guys signed, it applies to them all just change the dollar amount from 1.3 million, to 5.5 million, or 3 million, or 4.15 million.

That's what makes it a dumb argument, you have choosen Reaves but you could apply it to Bertuzzi, Domi or Klingberg.

As for Gambrell, Robertson and Mcmann I don't them playing for the Leafs, Robertson because he's to injury prone, the other 2 are AHL Fodder
 

notbias

Registered User
Feb 16, 2017
11,904
9,936
I mean you could use your argument for any of the new guys signed, it applies to them all just change the dollar amount from 1.3 million, to 5.5 million, or 3 million, or 4.15 million.

That's what makes it a dumb argument, you have choosen Reaves but you could apply it to Bertuzzi, Domi or Klingberg.

As for Gambrell, Robertson and Mcmann I don't them playing for the Leafs, Robertson because he's to injury prone, the other 2 are AHL Fodder

Reaves is useless, the others are NHL players, I guess that is why I used Reaves. He is going to play 6 minutes of bad hockey, deter no one from doing anything, organize some good parties, and get paid 1.35
 
  • Like
Reactions: al secord

danny90

Registered User
Nov 27, 2019
729
724
I mean you could use your argument for any of the new guys signed, it applies to them all just change the dollar amount from 1.3 million, to 5.5 million, or 3 million, or 4.15 million.

That's what makes it a dumb argument, you have choosen Reaves but you could apply it to Bertuzzi, Domi or Klingberg.

As for Gambrell, Robertson and Mcmann I don't them playing for the Leafs, Robertson because he's to injury prone, the other 2 are AHL Fodder
Id rather give them a chance than waste time on Reaves who is just not good at hockey
 

HockeyVirus

Woll stan.
Nov 15, 2020
19,423
29,694
Without Reaves signed, any of Robertson, McMann, Gambrell, and Steeves could have played and we'd be cap compliant with 12-7-2

We will see how they do it, but signing Reaves could potentially make us lose someone like Timmins.

And it would be incredibly Leafy to win a trade, have a young dman put up a 50+ season pace before he was moved to a winger for some reason, then lose him on waivers and have him do it for another team the next several years
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jimmy Firecracker

notbias

Registered User
Feb 16, 2017
11,904
9,936
[Tweet]

With Domi, Bertuzzi, Reeves & hopefully another tough defenceman this should be the Leafs in the playoffs.....


They almost missed the playoffs and got carried by Bob in the playoffs, I am not sure this did anything... having said that, I look forward to Domi sucker-punching Ekblad or someone else on Florida if this happens again



Ekblad said scores will be settled (they weren't). That is soft, at least don't make the threats.
 

Da Cool Rula

Registered User
Sep 8, 2017
3,017
1,814
Montego Bay, Jamaica
They almost missed the playoffs and got carried by Bob in the playoffs, I am not sure this did anything... having said that, I look forward to Domi sucker-punching Ekblad or someone else on Florida if this happens again



Ekblad said scores will be settled (they weren't). That is soft, at least don't make the threats.

Hahaha agree
 
  • Like
Reactions: arso40

notbias

Registered User
Feb 16, 2017
11,904
9,936
I absolutely love that attitude. So different to our guys.

That is needed.

They did this in the Vegas series a lot, turns out being better at hockey is the answer, not this.

It's fine to do but seems like there is no influence on the game.

I don’t see the downside anymore with this guy once I realized we could bury him in the minors if he has nothing left. Let it go Dubists.

He is currently the reason we need to trade or waive someone.

Orrrrr we can run the well-received 11-7
 

WTFMAN99

Registered User
Jun 17, 2009
34,121
12,253
I don’t see the downside anymore with this guy once I realized we could bury him in the minors if he has nothing left. Let it go Dubists.

If he's buried, there would still be some carry over right? I think we can only bury like 1.15 / 1.3M or something
 

kb

Registered User
Aug 28, 2009
15,307
21,851
I don’t see the downside anymore with this guy once I realized we could bury him in the minors if he has nothing left. Let it go Dubists.
Has nothing to do with anything other than it was a dumb signing. He can't be fully buried, which means waiving him and bringing up a min salary player won't do it.

Now the Leafs are forced to trade someone who can play because they overpaid for someone who can't. Hope the Tre lovers can quickly get used to this shoddy style of managing, because it's his pattern.
 
  • Like
Reactions: arso40

peconcan

Registered User
Apr 24, 2020
1,500
1,278
Klingberg is the problem we didn’t need him what so ever especially at 4.5. Everyone on these threads have said for years that we are soft and have nobody to stick up for their team or themselves, Reaves is the answer here. No way he plays 3 years he’ll be retired after this year or the next
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad